Category: environment

  • Cutting through the fog

    We stood on the Anna Maria City Pier boardwalk, looking east but unable to see the T-end through the thick morning fog.

    We couldn’t see the structure ahead, but the water under the pier was clear to the sandy bottom, where dozens of starfish appeared at rest.

    “The fog comes/on little cat feet,” my mom said. “Who wrote that? It’s the first poem I ever memorized.”

    She couldn’t recall the author.

    I couldn’t recall ever hearing the lines, but having grown up in Illinois, I should have recognized them, and having lived in Chicago, I should have known the author.

    Carl Sandburg, editor for the Chicago Daily News and the poet who wrote so powerfully about the city of big shoulders, also wrote “Fog”:

    The fog comes

           on little cat feet

           It sits looking

           over harbor and city

           on silent haunches

           and then moves on.

    Fog came in on Anna Maria Island most mornings last week.

    Silent? Yes.

    And the fog moved on by late morning, pushed out by the warming sunshine.

    The Tampa Bay region sees about 133 foggy days per year, more than the 121 cloudy days that’s the average.

    Our fog typically is a wintertime development, with a season that runs December-February.

    Fog basically is water droplets suspended in the air at the Earth’s surface, but there are many types of fog, as well as degrees of fog density. The National Weather Service offers some unpoetic explanations and definitions:

    • Radiation fog forms at night when heat absorbed by the Earth’s surface during the day is radiated into space. As the surface continues to cool, provided a deep enough layer of moist air is present near the ground, the humidity will reach 100% and fog forms.

    Radiation fog can vary in depth from 3 feet to about 1,000 feet and usually remains stationary.

    • Advection fog looks like radiation fog and is also the result of condensation. However, the condensation with advection fog is caused by the horizontal movement of warm, moist air over a cold surface, such as snow or water.

    Advection fog can sometimes be distinguished from radiation fog by its horizontal motion along the ground.

    The fog tends to dissipate quickly once the sun comes up.

    • Sea fog is advection fog caused by the transport of moist air over a colder body of water. Such fog occurs here over the Gulf of Mexico, the bays, and the Manatee River and can move into land areas.
    • Evaporation-mixing fog forms when water vapor is added to the air by evaporation and the moist air mixes with cooler, drier air.

    Two common types of this fog are steam fog, formed when cold air mixes with the warm, moist air over the water, and frontal fog, formed when warm raindrops evaporate into a cooler, drier layer of air near the ground.

    Now there’s at least one type of fog we shouldn’t expect to see over local waters or land at any time of year.

    Ice fog, also known as frost flakes or frozen fog, contains ice crystals and is found in the polar and arctic regions.

    Just imagine what might be seen in such a chilly fog: polar bears, ice boulders, a driver in a red sleigh with nine reindeer.

  • Monumental fight waged over national monuments

    If a tree falls at the Giant Sequoia National Monument in California, will a friend of Donald Trump get rich?

    This is the question that circulated on social media in late April, as Trump signed yet another executive order — this time directing Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to review the designations of dozens of national monuments on federal lands.

    Trump signed the order April 26, three days before he both hit his 100-day mark — which he dismissed as “a ridiculous standard” — and faced renewed resistance in the form of another global protest, the People’s Climate March.

    The order could lead to the removal of protections enacted by Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama under the 1906 Antiquities Act, which authorizes presidents to declare federal lands as monuments to guard culturally or environmentally significant lands and waters from exploitation.

    Zinke accused prior presidents of using the Antiquities Act as a political tool, and Trump said he wanted to end “another egregious abuse of federal power.”

    However, environmentalists say he wants to open federal resources to plunderers.

    “Blowing up more than 100 years of bipartisan tradition to rob our kids of their natural legacy is shameful and sad,” said David Yarnold, president and CEO of the National Audubon Society. “These are places Americans hold in their hearts.”

    The order called for a review of 27 monuments — every area larger than 100,000 acres protected since 1996 — including:

    • Bears Ears National Monument in Utah, a 1.3 million-acre monument established by Obama near the end of his presidency.
    • Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument in Maine, designated by Obama in 2016 and the Atlantic Ocean’s first marine national monument, with 5,000 square miles of underwater canyons and mountains.
    • Giant Sequoia National Monument, which President Bill Clinton established in 2000 to expand the number of protected Sequoia groves.

    Timber companies want access to Sequoia. The commercial fishing industry wants access to Seamounts. And the energy industry wants in at Bears Ears, home to a million acres of land sacred to Native Americans.

    “Trump and the anti-public-lands zealots in Congress are plotting to destroy some of the country’s most stunning landscapes and cultural treasures,” said Randi Spivak, director of the Center for Biological Diversity’s public lands program. “Their goal is to hand our public lands to corporations to mine, frack, bulldoze and clear-cut till there’s nothing left to dig up.”

    Offshore drilling

    Two days after signing the order requiring the monuments review, Trump signed another order aimed at expanding drilling in the Arctic and opening other federal areas to oil and gas exploration.

    “This executive order starts the process of opening offshore areas to job-creating energy exploration,” Trump said during the White House signing ceremony. “It reverses the previous administration’s Arctic leasing ban and directs Secretary Zinke to allow responsible development of offshore areas that will bring revenue to our treasury and jobs to our workers.”

    The president also directed Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross to conduct a review of marine monuments and sanctuaries designated over the past 10 years. This could directly impact efforts to protect resources in Lake Michigan.

    “Trump’s shortsighted order reverses climate progress and imperils coastal communities, irreplaceable wildlife and our shared future,” said Trip Van Noppen, president of Earthjustice. “We will go to court to enforce the law and ensure President Obama’s protections remain in place.”

    Did you know?

    National monument designations date to Theodore Roosevelt’s presidency, and some of the nation’s most treasured national parks were first protected as monuments, including Grand Teton, Grand Canyon, Bryce, Zion, Acadia and Olympic.

    Note: This story was originally published in the Wisconsin Gazette.

  • Climate change could collapse songbird population

    Birdwatchers in the Midwest know the Acadian flycatcher’s song goes “peet-sah, peet-sah.” But will birders a century from now know the call?

    New research from the University of Missouri suggests the common songbird is at risk of severe population decline within the century due to global warming.

    “The possibility that an abundant species could approach near-extinction from the region within 90 years clearly demonstrates the significant impact of a warming climate on songbird populations,” said Thomas Bonnot, an assistant research professor at the university’s School of Natural Resources.

    For years, the Audubon Society and other groups have warned of the impact of climate change on bird populations, especially species considered threatened.

    Bonnot’s research looks at a common species.

    He worked with a former adviser, Frank Thompson of the U.S. Forest Service, who has spent more than two decades researching the Acadian flycatcher, an olive and yellowish bird with a long and broad bill.

    They made projections from data on the effects of higher temperatures on breeding, running through the year 2100.

    The researchers found that a warming climate would have a severe impact on breeding, threatening the flycatcher population.

    If climate change continues at its current pace, the flycatcher’s breeding productivity would fall below 1 fledgling per female per year by 2100, according to the study published in the Nature Climate Change Journal.

    However, the research model shows that if greenhouse gas emissions are lowered and the course of climate change stabilizes, the future for the Acadian flycatcher improves.

    Bonnot said other common birds could face similar threats.

    Note: This story was originally published in the Wisconsin Gazette.

  • Activists take direct action in continued call to stop Line 3

    Activists take direct action in continued call to stop Line 3

    Environmental activists risked arrest Aug. 29 with a demonstration urging Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton to act immediately to stop Enbridge’s Line 3 tar sands pipeline project.

    Participants included tribal elders, environmental and indigenous advocates and faith leaders.

    Some activists gathered in Bemidji to engage in an act of civil disobedience — the occupation of a downtown intersection for four hours.

    Others staged a sit-in Dayton’s office.

    “We are calling on Gov. Dayton to act. It is time for him to protect Minnesota from this dangerous tar sands pipeline,” said Margaret Levin, director of the Sierra Club North Star Chapter.

    Earlier this summer, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission voted to approve Enbridge’s proposal to replace a portion of its Line 3 pipeline against the recommendations of the state department of commerce, office of administrative hearings, pollutions control agency and department of natural resources.

    The commission also voted against the wishes of four tribal governments and thousands of Minnesotans who participated in the review process and opposed Line 3.

    The pipeline will carry tar sands oil from the Athabasca River Basin in Alberta. It risks spills in fragile areas, including where American Indians harvest wild rice. Ojibwe Indians, or Anishinaabe, consider wild rice sacred and central to their culture.

    Line 3’s terminal is in Superior, Wisconsin.

    “I am here to say, Bimaadiziwin Nibi. Water is life,” said Winona LaDuke, the executive director of Honor the Earth, who lives and works on the White Earth reservation in northern Minnesota. “I am here to say that our state should not be militarized and our people arrested and injured for a Canadian Pipeline Co. I am here because it is necessary to be here, to protect our future generations. I am a water protector.”

    About 60 people participated in the protest and several were detained by law enforcement.

    “This dirty tar sands project is another example of the fossil fuel industry’s disregard for tribal sovereignty, clean air and water, and the health and safety of communities and the climate,” said Kendall Mackey, a Keep it in the Ground campaigner for global group 350.org. “It’s time for Gov. Dayton to show real climate leadership by listening to the people of Minnesota and stopping Line 3 for good.”

    Note: This story originally published in the Wisconsin Gazette.

  • Watershed campaign: Milwaukeeans unite behind water initiative

    For some Milwaukeeans, summer begins with a dance in the Summerfest water fountain during PrideFest.

    For others, it begins with a starry night paddle on the Milwaukee River or the first beach day.

    Water puts the sparkle in Milwaukee’s summers and helps define the city’s identity.

    “I live to be on the water,” says Bobby Lagerstrom, an avid kayaker and competitive swimmer. “That’s what brought me here. Milwaukee is a great water town.”

    In mid-May, Milwaukee Water Commons, a project of the Milwaukee Environmental Consortium, brought several hundred people together at the Best Place at the Historic Pabst Brewery for the Confluence Gathering. The event was the culmination of a two-year process involving 1,300 people and more than 30 groups interested in shaping a vision to make Milwaukee a model water city.

    “It was a very robust conversation,” said Milwaukee Water Commons executive director Ann Brummitt. “We talked to people about water — what matters, what are the issues, what are the concerns. And then we really asked people about a vision going forward.”

    Milwaukee Water Commons’ slogan is “Together, we’re shaping Milwaukee’s water future.” The nonprofit abides by these principles: Water is an essential element for all life on Earth. Water belongs to no one and cannot be owned. People have a responsibility to protect and preserve clean fresh water. Decisions about the care and use of water must involve everyone. And the Great Lakes are a gift, having “nurtured our ancestors and shaped us as a people and as a community. They continue to sustain us.”

    The group operates a water school that collaborates with other organizations on specific programs and cultivates neighborhood leadership. MWC also conducts town hall-style meetings and workshops and works with local artists.

    The Confluence Gathering provided the opportunity to launch six water initiatives under the “Water City Agenda.” The vision is for Milwaukee to:

    • Be a national leader in “blue-green” jobs. Work is underway to promote the blue-green economy in the city, but the scale needs to grow, according to Brummitt, who previously directed the Milwaukee River Greenway Coalition and worked as a school teacher.

    • Make safe, clean and affordable tap water available to every Milwaukeean. A chief concern in Milwaukee, as it is nationally, is aging pipes. “While our tap water that comes out of Milwaukee Water Works is very good, by the time it gets to your kitchen faucet, there’s a chance of lead,” Brummitt said.

    • Advance green infrastructure practices across the city. “There’s a lot of really good energy going into this goal already,” according to Brummitt, who said elements in new developments might include rain gardens and green roofs, bioswales and curb cuts.

    • Make Milwaukee’s three rivers and Lake Michigan swimmable and fishable.

    • Offer every Milwaukeean meaningful water experiences. Brummitt made this observation: For all the sailing, kayaking, swimming, fishing and strolling that takes place in Milwaukee, there are children in the city who’ve never been to one of the rivers.

    • Celebrate local waters in arts and culture.

    “There’s a lot of work to be done,” said Brummitt. “As strong as our water culture is, we’re still losing ground. We can’t keep pace with the environmental degradation. So that’s where we felt there was room to bring in more people and more perspective. Everybody has something to say about the future of water in Milwaukee.”

    In the coming months, think tanks will be established to tackle each initiative and, Aug. 7, an annual H20 happening — We Are Water — will be held at Bradford Beach on the Lake Michigan shore.

    Institutional partners in carrying out the Water City Agenda include the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee School of Freshwater Sciences and the Metropolitan Milwaukee Sewerage District.

    “The science is there, the tools are available and our water policy researchers are ready to help turn these transformative ideas into reality,” Jenny Kehl, director of the Center for Water Policy at UW-M, said in a news statement.

    Nonprofit partners in the campaign include leading environmental groups, as well as community and neighborhood organizations such as Alice’s Garden, a nonprofit in the Johnsons Park neighborhood.

    “The work Milwaukee Water Commons has taken on is some of the most important work this city will do,” said Venice Williams, director of Alice’s Garden. “It is about preserving the dignity of the ancestral waters of Lake Michigan. It is also about helping every human being who quenches their thirst, bathes their body, rinses their clothes, mops their floors, enjoys their cup of tea to understand one cannot exist without water.”

    A sister project, with a regional focus, is the Great Lakes Commons, and organizers in other Great Lakes cities, specifically Toronto and Cleveland, are at work employing the “commons” concept.

    “When we started this work, we started to look and see if there was a model for this kind of thing,” said Brummitt. “But there just isn’t a well established framework for a water city. This is our foray into creating that. It will be developed. That’s coming. We’re shaping the agenda in Milwaukee.”

    Become a commoner

    For more information or to get involved with Milwaukee Water Commons, visit milwaukeewatercommons.org.

    Save the date

    On Aug. 7, Milwaukee Water Commons will present We Are Water 2016, a communitywide celebration at the north end of Bradford Beach. The event will feature song and dance, artwork and spoken word, and the creation of a large, illuminated image of the Great Lakes in the sand.

    In related news …

    Carpenter raises concerns for pipeline spills

    Wisconsin Sen. Tim Carpenter, D-Milwaukee, asked U.S. Sens. Tammy Baldwin and Ron Johnson to join with U.S. Sens. Gary Peters and Debbie Stabenow of Michigan to make sure the Department of Transportation classifies underwater pipelines in and around the Great Lakes as “offshore” facilities.

    Why? Carpenter said under federal law cleanup for “onshore” facilities is capped at $634 million but “offshore” facilities must have resources to cover all costs.

    If there were a spill in the water from the pipeline that’s transporting 23 million gallons of crude oil and liquid gas daily, the cleanup could be $1 billion. The pipeline crosses the Straits of Mackinac, connecting Lake Michigan and Lake Huron.

    “Our incentives should be to protect the waters and avoid economic catastrophe of spills,” Carpenter said.

    WiG

  • Lift off: Flying back from edge of extinction

    Lift off: Flying back from edge of extinction

    Reason to “whoop”: Central Wisconsin is welcoming back “snowbirds” — Nana and Papa are packing up suitcases and closing down condos on Florida’s sunny shores and heading home. But actual snowbirds are flying 1,000-plus miles over the United States to nest in Wisconsin’s woods and marshes, backyards and shorelines.Among them is one of North America’s most magnificent birds, the whooping crane, a species on the edge of extinction decades ago and still endangered. Just 21 whooping cranes existed in North America in 1941, but today the population is about 600.

     

    “I’m not a sentimental person,” said whooper enthusiast Karen Murphy, who lives near St. Marks Wildlife Refuge in St. Marks, Florida, one of the places where the birds winter. “But my God, when you see a whooping crane soar, it’s emotional.”

    The rescuers — a team of scientists, government officials, ultralight pilots, nonprofit organizers, philanthropists and volunteers — come across as humble, focused more on the day-to-day activity of the birds than on their extraordinary battle against extinction.

    But they do recognize the magnitude of guaranteeing the existence of Grus Americana.

    “We’re reintroducing this bird for a whole number of reasons. For one, it deserves to be here. And, if you save whooping cranes, you have to save habitat. And habitat also is essential for our survival,” said Joseph Duff, CEO and co-founder of Operation Migration Inc., the nonprofit playing a crucial role in establishing the Eastern Migratory Flock of cranes. Operation Migration helps prepare juvenile whoopers for migration and leads the young cranes to Florida using ultralight aircraft, with Duff as the lead pilot.

    In early April, Duff was at OM’s headquarters in Ontario, Canada, where he awaited reports from the cranes’ winter grounds in Florida, and from Wisconsin, where a ground crew eagerly awaited the return of the birds.

    As WiG went to press, one crane in the 2014 class — “7-14,” for the hatch order and year — and two adult cranes arrived in Marquette County, Wisconsin. Five other class members went soaring on April 3, departing with an adult crane to guide them to central Wisconsin. The next morning, the cranes were over Alabama.

    For the Operation Migration crew, the spring migration is a real test of their feathered students.

    The class of 2014 began the 1,250-mile trek from Wisconsin’s White River Marsh to Florida last October. But bad weather kept grounding the cranes and the ultralights. The flyers covered just 52 miles in 32 days. Eventually, the team had to crate the birds and move on to Carroll, Tennessee, skipping miles on the migration route for a species that learns to fly by “imprinting.”

    “We’ve never broken their train of knowledge,” Duff said. “So the big concern: How do they know the way back?”

    Crane 7-14 returned to Wisconsin without having flown part of the route in the fall, but the question remains for the others, who were over Kentucky on April 8.

    Wonderful whoopers

    Whooping cranes are remarkable birds, a species that dates back 50 million years. Adult cranes stand 5 feet tall, with a wingspan of more than 7 feet. They are bright white, with a crown of red and wings tipped with black.

    “To see one in the wild would be at the top of any birder’s lifelist,” said Charlie McCurdy, a Wisconsin bird-watcher who follows Operation Migration cranes online, including on the Crane Cam.

    Decades of unregulated hunting and destruction of their habitat nearly destroyed the species. Today just one self-sustaining wild population exists — the birds that summer in the Northwest Territories of Canada and winter at the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge in Texas. The long-term fate of the species remains uncertain.

    By the early 1960s, concerned that disease or a single weather catastrophe could wipe out the flock, conservationists began exploring ways to establish new populations. In 1975, scientists collected whooper eggs from nests in Canada and placed them with sandhill cranes at Gray’s Lake National Wildlife Refuge in Idaho, finding some success.

    But by the mid-1990s, conservationists were seriously looking at the novel idea of using ultralight aircraft to teach juvenile whooping cranes to migrate. And, by 2001, the Whooping Crane Eastern Partnership began introducing a new migratory flock — the Wisconsin birds — into North America. Additionally, non-migratory flocks were introduced in Florida and Louisiana.

    Approval for the migratory whooping crane program followed other successful test programs. Operation Migration already had ultralight pilots leading Canada geese, trumpeter swans and sandhill cranes on migrations.

    Canadian naturalist Bill Carrick, in the 1980s, learned he could imprint Canada geese to follow his boat. Then Canadian ultralight pilot Bill Lishman succeeded in 1988 in flying with geese. He documented the adventure in C’mon Geese, an award-winning video that caught the attention of Terry Kohler of Sheboygan.

    Kohler, a pilot, environmentalist and longtime supporter of the International Crane Foundation in Baraboo, showed the video to George Archibald, ICF co-founder and a world-renowned crane expert.

    An idea was hatched

    “George contacted Bill and Bill was interested. He asked me. I said sure,” Duff recalled. “And the more I got involved, the more interested I became.”

    But before the first successful ultralight migration with whoopers, there were other adventures. Lishman recruited Duff, a pilot and commercial photographer, to fly with 18 Canada geese from Ontario to Virginia, in 1993 — a trip documented by ABC’s 20/20.

    A year later, Operation Migration became a Canadian charity. And the next year, Lishman and Duff formed a production company and partnered with Columbia Pictures to produce Fly Away Home, a film starring Jeff Daniels and Anna Paquin and telling a fictionalized story about a man migrating with geese.

    Duff chuckled when asked about continued interest in the movie.

    “It was a long time ago,” said Duff, who trained the geese for the film and provided footage. “It was a lot of fun to do it and gave us some funding.”

    The film brought fame to Operation Migration’s work.

    And then, in 1998, there was more fame.

    Building a recovery

    Operation Migration’s successes with other species convinced the International Whooping Crane Recovery Team that cranes could imprint and follow an ultralight along a pre-determined migratory route to winter grounds.

    “Our aircraft creates a wake behind it,” Duff said. And the birds feel that and learn to fly in a long line off the wing tip. “If we match the speed perfectly, then the bird just hangs there, just gets carried along by the aircraft.”

    The Whooping Crane Eastern Partnership was formed in 1999. Founding members include the International Crane Foundation, the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Operation Migration, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Health Center, Whooping Crane Recovery Team, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and Wisconsin Natural Resources Foundation.

    The goal is to have a flock of 125 birds in Wisconsin by 2020, including 25 nesting pairs producing 18–20 chicks a year. The federal goal for the species in North America is to establish a self-sustaining population of at least 1,000 cranes by 2035.

    The captive-born cranes in the class of 2014 hatched at the U.S. Geological Survey’s Patuxent Wildlife Research Center in Laurel, Maryland, home to the world’s largest breeding flock of whoopers.

    There, and at every station throughout the program, caretakers conceal their humanness from the cranes. Chicks exposed to humans become imprinted on them. So, even though caretakers act as surrogate parents, they do so in costumes. They don’t speak in the company of cranes. They use crane puppets when feeding the birds. They shield the birds from man-made structures and equipment. They play tapes of bird calls in the hatchery, the pens and from the aircraft. The caretakers and trainers also play recordings of ultralight aircraft engine noise, helping the birds imprint on the aircraft and conditioning them to fly with the machine — if only for the southern migration.

    Before fledging, the cranes go from Patuxent to Wisconsin for flight lessons. Initially, populations were introduced in Wisconsin at Necedah National Wildlife Refuge, which remains the summer breeding ground for much of the Eastern flock.

    However, black flies proved a problem at Necedah, and the summer trainings were relocated five years ago to the “Wisconsin Rectangle,” a wetlands area that includes Horicon National Wildlife Refuge and White River Marsh.

    Last fall, the cranes departed for Florida from the White River Marsh.

    And that’s where 7-14 headed this spring.

    “We’re really pleased,” Duff said.

    But much work remains to protect the species.

    “When you save a whooping crane, you have to save habitat, and everything else that makes a wetland work,” said Duff. “You see, conservation is not just nice to do. It’s important to our survival.”

    Overhead …

    Operation Migration flyover and stopover sites, from Wisconsin to Florida in the fall and Florida to Wisconsin in the spring, include, by county:

    WISCONSIN: Green Lake, Marquette, Columbia, Green and Winnebago.

    ILLINOIS: LaSalle, Livingston, Piatt, Cumberland and Wayne.

    KENTUCKY: Union and Marshall.

    TENNESSEE: Carroll, Hardin.

    ALABAMA: Walker, Chilton, Lowndes, Pike.

    GEORGIA: Decatur.

    FLORIDA: Leon and Wakulla.

    Source: Operation Migration

     
  • By the bay

    By the bay

    I like to play a game called “Before My Time.”

    The game involves a lot of imagination and at least a little knowledge.

    Round one might require imagining jalopies bouncing across the old wooden bridge from Cortez to Bradenton Beach.

    In another round, I might wonder what it was like to place a meat order at the old IGA when it was an old IGA.

    More research would go into the game when imagining when Cubans created fish camps on the shores of Sarasota Bay or indigenous peoples harvested shellfish from the bay. For this, I suggest reading the Sarasota Bay Estuary Program’s conservation and management plan, posted in June to the SBEP’s website at sarasotabay.org.

    This column is the first in a series on the 208-page document.

    The various updates of the plan — from the first in 1995 to versions in 2010, 2014 and now 2021 — focus on science but passion for the bay, curiosity about history and care for writing.

    You’ll get a flavor in the 2021 draft: “The bay’s iconic beauty, abundant fish and shellfish, and charismatic birds, dolphins, manatees and sea turtles attracted and sustained residents from early indigenous peoples to Cuban fishers, to post World War II couples and their Baby Boomer kids.”

    The plan is a science-based, community-driven blueprint to protect and restore the bay, examining water quality, watershed habitats, fish and wildlife, community role in protecting the bay and, to begin, an introduction to the greater Sarasota Bay estuarian system.

    Estuaries — partially enclosed coastal waterbodies where saltwater from the ocean mixes with freshwater from rivers and creeks — provide habitat for 80% of fish and shellfish. They’re vital to ecosystems and economies.

    The greater Sarasota Bay Estuarine System is a 50-mile-long coastal lagoon and its interconnected Gulf waters, bays and tidal creeks link a mosaic of habitats — seagrass meadows, hardbottom, oyster reefs, beaches and salty and fresh wetlands.

    But the bay, altered by urban and agricultural development, shows signs of stress — wastewater and stormwater pollutants, waterway alterations and disruptions, introduction of invasive and nuisance species, overharvesting and climate change.

    I’ll be looking at these stress factors in the weeks ahead, along with examining how SBEP hopes to advance a community vision for the bay that includes “abundant seagrass meadows teeming with fish and shellfish, well-developed oyster reefs filtering water and providing essential habitat for fish and birds, living vegetated coastal wetlands and shorelines filtering runoff and protecting the coast, a mosaic of uplands, freshwater wetlands and tidal creeks … and unimpeded vegetated dunes and sandy shorelines along Gulf beaches.

    While I like to play “Before My Time,” it’s vital to engage in this time for “after my time.”

    About the SBEP

    Sarasota Bay was named an estuary of national significance by the U.S. Congress in 1989. The Sarasota Bay Estuary Program, dedicated to protecting and restoring the bay, is one of 28 such programs in the United States and a member of the Association of National Estuary Programs.

    A timeline for the bay

    1000s: Indigenous people inhabit the area. Shell middens still shape estuary shorelines.

    1800s: Cubans establish fish camps on the bayshore, trading mainly in mullet and mullet roe.

    Late 1800s: Dredging of the Intracoastal Waterway begins in Sarasota Bay, leading to the creation of many dredge-spoil islands.

    Early to mid-1900s: Large-scale land reclamation projects drain thousands of acres of freshwater marsh across the state and coastal development intensifies.

    1972: Congress passes the federal Clean Water Act.

    1972: Florida’s Wilson-Grizzle Act requires wastewater treatment plants discharging to southwest Florida estuaries, including Sarasota Bay, to upgrade their standards or divert 100% to reclaimed use.

    1982: Florida’s stormwater rule goes into effect, requiring municipal stormwater systems to manage nutrients.

    1989: The Environmental Protection Agency recognizes Sarasota Bay as an “estuary of national significance.”

    2008: Seagrass acreage surpasses the restoration target.

    2011: Nutrient criteria are established for area bays, setting limits to protect Sarasota and Manatee waterways from nutrient over-enrichment.

    2018: The last regular, permitted wastewater discharge into the bay — from the Siesta Key Water Reclamation plant — is removed.

    — Lisa Neff

  • Building better habitats

    Building better habitats

    Dead fish on the shore get attention — national media devotes coverage, gubernatorial candidates jab and dodge, business owners fret and tourists fear.

    But when the dead fish are clear and the red tide dissipates, so does concern for the health of our waters.

    All locals might not be fortunate enough to have water views from our homes, but it’s safe to guess that we’re minutes away — by foot or car — from a bay, a river, a canal, the Gulf. I can walk two minutes and stand at the shore of one bay, drive 10 minutes and be at the shore of another bay, add five minutes — during off-hours — and sit on a Gulf beach.

    Among my multiple identities, I’m a resident of the Greater Sarasota Bay Watershed and the way I maintain my habitat impacts bay habitats.

    The Sarasota Bay Estuary Program earlier this summer published a draft document examining the health of Sarasota Bay, exploring progress and setbacks in bay recovery and identifying goals and actions, including a plan to restore shoreline, wetland and bay habitats.

    SBEP reports progress with restoring seagrass, increased numbers of live oysters in tidal creeks, as well as projects to improve freshwater wetlands, restore dunes, remove exotic plant species, establish bird habitats, conserve land and prescribe burns — all to benefit the bay.

    But more must be done to improve fisheries, enhance coastal wetlands, improve shoreline resiliency, protect freshwater wetlands and restore seagrass habitat to boost the bay’s health.

    “Healthy bay water quality and wildlife require a diversity of interconnected habitats in the watershed … that support the full suite of natural processes to sustain life,” SBEP’s report states.

    Goals include:

    • Restore creek and canal flowways to mimic natural stream functions.

    Naturalizing people-made canals and altered waterways provides better habitat for fish and wildlife.

    • Enhance coastal wetlands by installing living shorelines, protecting spoil islands, and reducing or eliminating mangrove trimming.

    Historically, marshes were drained and dredged for buildings and seawalls, fragmenting and impairing the bay’s coastal wetlands.

    • Increase the upland and freshwater wetland habitat.

    Since the 1950s, urban development has degraded, fragmented and replaced upland forests and freshwater wetlands. So today, the SBEP area has just 5,599 acres of freshwater wetlands and 4,648 acres of forested uplands.

    • Restore hard bottom and seagrass habitat in the bay by creating new reefs, mapping seagrass and implementing water quality strategies to increase productive and resilient seagrass.

    Seagrass meadows provide food and habitat for finfish and shellfish and seagrass is vital in cycling nitrogen and carbon, as well as beneficial to reducing wave action and coastal erosion.

    But seagrass acreage did not meet restoration targets in most bay segments in 2020.

    • Protect beaches and dunes for wildlife and resiliency.

    The barrier island beaches provide critical habitat for the marine life and wildlife of Sarasota Bay but they face threats from erosion, invasive species, pollution, recreation and, yes, the grooming that makes the white sand look so good.

    Grooming also eliminates beach wrack and beaches without wrack have diminished habitat — lower species richness and abundance of the invertebrates and fewer shorebirds.

    On the web

    The Sarasota Bay Estuary Program’s 208-page comprehensive conservation and management plan can be downloaded at sarasotabay.org.

  • ‘Extreme’ labor

    ‘Extreme’ labor

    After I wanted to be an architect like Mike Brady in “The Brady Bunch” and before I wanted to be a journalist like Bob Woodward at the Washington Post, I wanted to be a forest ranger.

    I don’t know how I got the inspiration, but I was interested enough in the career path to subscribe to a mail-order course for junior rangers.

    Each week, a package containing a lesson and a quiz arrived. I graded myself, so I sometimes cheated and always earned an A grade.

    I remember a lesson on identifying animal poop, and perhaps that’s when my interest shifted.

    Still, on just about any visit to a Manatee County preserve or a Florida state park, I find myself daydreaming about an idyllic life as a ranger, a fire lookout, a campground manager, a trail guide.

    Then I swat away at a mosquito, wipe the sweat off my neck and think about the extreme labor in outdoor work, especially in Florida, where “hot summer” is redundant.

    The health risks outdoor workers face are real, and with climate change, the health risks and threats to job security will only grow.

    In August, the nonprofit Union of Concerned Scientists released a report, “Too Hot to Work,” an assessment of the threats climate change poses to outdoor workers.

    The conclusion in the report: As climate change brings one record-heat decade after another, outdoor workers increasingly will have to choose between risking their lives to go to work or their livelihoods to stay safe.

    Already, outdoor workers have up to 35 times the risk of dying from heat exposure than does the general population.

    The impacts of heat on health depend on many factors, but the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration recommends employers implement precautions when the heat index exceeds 90 degrees F.

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention further recommends reducing work schedules as “adjusted temperatures” rise to 100-108 degrees. Above 108 degrees, outdoor work should be canceled or rescheduled because the risks to health are so grave.

    The Union of Concerned Scientists’ analysis found that by midcentury, given slow or no action to reduce global heat-trapping emissions, the increased intensity, frequency and geographic extent of extreme heat would cause a three- to fourfold increase in the exposure of outdoor workers to days with a heat index — or “feels like” temperature — above 100 degrees, the point at which the CDC recommends work hours begin to be reduced.

    So outdoor workers will have their health more at risk, but they could lose income as a result of extreme heat.

    About 9.2% of outdoor workers annually experience a week with a heat index above 100 degrees.

    By midcentury, the estimate grows to 57%.

    Also, by midcentury, about 18.2% of outdoor workers annually could experience a month with a heat index above 100 degrees.

    The analysis estimates that about a fifth of U.S. workers have outdoor occupations. The focus in the analysis is on public safety, construction, transportation, agriculture and parks, but that seems narrow, overlooking those cleaning pools, maintaining resort grounds, repairing golf carts, tending bar and serving meals.

    So this Labor Day, if fortunate enough to celebrate a day off from your labors with an island outing, give consideration and kindness to the first responders, the servers, the caretakers keeping you happy, safe and comfortable.

    Did you know?

    Oregon was the first state to pass a law recognizing Labor Day, doing so on Feb. 21, 1887. Later that year, four more states — Colorado, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York — passed laws creating a Labor Day holiday.

    By the end of the decade, Connecticut, Nebraska and Pennsylvania had followed suit.

    And by 1894, 23 more states had established laws recognizing the holiday.

    Congress established the federal Labor Day in 1894, setting the legal holiday on the first Monday in September.

  • Catching the breeze

    Oct. 1 arrived and I threw open a window to bring in fresh air.

    Ah, autumn, I thought.

    And then I thought of what autumn brings after a hot spring and sizzling summer: outdoor events, especially Bayfest, that annual block party where full-timers on AMI welcome back seasonal friends flocking from the north before the snow falls.

    Bayfest, presented by the Anna Maria Island Chamber of Commerce, is set for Saturday, Oct. 16, on Pine Avenue in Anna Maria, with a kickoff party the night before in City Pier Park.

    The pandemic forced the cancellation of the 2020 festival and inclement weather pushed organizers to take the celebration indoors in 2019.

    Now Bayfest is back.

    And in these times, can there be a better weekend event than one that promises encounters with friends along with outdoor music, alfresco and an open-air marketplace?

    Just consider the health-related benefits of getting fresh air:

    • Improves blood pressure;
    • Improves the heart rate;
    • Good for the digestive system;
    • Strengthens the immune system;
    • Cleans the lungs;
    • Sharpens the mind;
    • Boosts energy;
    • Generates happiness.

    I’ve felt cooped up this summer, hiding in the air conditioning and wondering: What’s in the vents? Is the humidity low enough? Is the CO2 monitor working?

    The coronavirus pandemic put a spotlight on “sick buildings,” but such concerns aren’t new. The modern focus dates at least to the 1970s, when building for energy efficiency led to reduced ventilation, the buildup of pollutants and a syndrome associated with headaches, coughing, chest tightness and eye irritation.

    A couple of weekends ago, I caught an episode of “People’s Pharmacy” on NPR — WUSF 89.7 FM radio — about sick buildings and the Healthy Building program at Harvard University.

    The Harvard program focuses on making sick buildings healthy by improving air circulation and ventilation, buying office products and building materials with low chemical emissions, removing legacy pollutants such as lead and PCBs, limiting vapor intrusion, maintaining humidity, mitigating odor, cleaning surfaces to reduce dust and dirt and bringing in sunlight.

    Research reveals the benefits:

    • Higher productivity;
    • Reduced illness, even colds;
    • More strategic decisions;
    • Better able to handle crises.

    How do you heal a sick building? By examining the flow of fresh air, monitoring air quality, keeping moisture in a healthy range, removing toxic materials and limiting exposure to chemicals.

    One more thing: throw open a window.

    More information

    For more information about the Healthy Buildings program, go online to forhealth.org.

  • Ghost bird goes extinct

    Ghost bird goes extinct

    The ghost bird is officially extinct.

    A video in 2005 suggesting the ivory-billed woodpecker was in a swamp in Arkansas inspired legions of bird enthusiasts to believe.

    We hoped for a comeback story, but there is no comeback for America’s largest woodpecker and 22 other species declared extinct in late September by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

    The FWS, in a notice Sept. 29, said, “Based on rigorous reviews of the best available science for each of these species, the service has determined these species are extinct and thus no longer require listing under the ESA.

    “The purpose of the ESA is to protect and recover imperiled species and the ecosystems upon which they depend. For the species proposed for delisting today, the protections of the ESA came too late.”

    Eight species of freshwater mussels, once found in healthy streams and rivers in the Southeast, are also gone, as is the San Marcos gambusia, a freshwater fish once found in Texas, the Scioto madtom fish once found in Ohio and 11 species once found in Hawai’i and the Pacific Islands.

    The Bachman’s warbler that flew over Florida during its migration is gone.

    And the ivory-billed woodpecker that once thrived in Florida is gone.

    Some people might shrug off the news. After all, multiple generations grew up without knowing of the ivory-billed woodpecker.

    To those people, I’d say, “Imagine if the Florida manatee were declared extinct, the Florida panther, the American alligator, the loggerhead sea turtle, the monarch butterfly, even the honeybee.”

    The demise of the ivory-billed woodpecker tells us such extinctions really could happen, that the animals we see nesting on the beach, swimming in the Gulf, flying overhead might be gone someday.

    The ivory-billed was listed as endangered in 1967, but the last commonly agreed-upon sighting was in April 1944 on the Singer Tract in northeast Louisiana.

    Deforestation and development destroyed the bird’s habitat,but still, people hoped, listened and looked for the species throughout the second half of the 20th century and the first decades of the 21st.

    The survey efforts here and in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Alabama resulted in rumored sightings, blurry video, and misidentification.

    In the days when ivory-billed swooped down from a long-leaf pine to awe onlookers, the woodpecker was known as the “Lord God bird.”

    It became the “ghost bird” after it went missing from North America.

    And now it’s a “gone bird.”

    There’s a hard lesson for the dreamers and the developers in the declared demise of the ivory-billed woodpecker: Human activity can drive species to decline and extinction. Efforts to conserve species before their declines become irreversible are vital.

  • Going beneath the surface

    Going beneath the surface

    Scanning the surface of Sarasota Bay, people see dolphins, pelicans and pleasure boaters.

    Those who go below the surface and dive into the research find the hazards to dolphins, other marine life, human life and bay life.

    The Sarasota Bay Estuary Program earlier this summer published a draft document examining the status of Sarasota Bay and listing actions to protect and preserve the local waters.

    A goal is to improve water quality, as well as the quantity and distribution of freshwater flow in the estuary.

    You might be aware of the causes of damage, or at least some of them:

    • Excess nutrients;
    • Harmful algal blooms;
    • High bacteria levels;
    • Low dissolved oxygen concentrations;
    • Increased sediment loads from excess runoff;
    • Toxins;
    • Microplastics;
    • Alteration of natural hydrology.

    The list goes on, but I can narrow it to a single threat: humans. About the only blame we don’t need to shoulder is fecal waste from wildlife.

    We’re responsible for wastewater, pet waste and fertilizer runoff that contribute to excess nutrients.

    We’re responsible for the microplastics emerging as a pollution of concern, the spasms and bursts of development that altered freshwater flow and we must answer for the climate change causing rising seas and fluctuating precipitation patterns.

    We’re responsible for broken infrastructure, population growth and emissions.

    We focus a lot on nutrient pollution in watersheds and bays, but don’t just look to power plants or Piney Point. Airborne nitrogen compounds — nitrogen oxides and ammonia — are a significant source of nutrient pollution, deposited directly in the bay by stormwater or groundwater, but also as gas and dust and rainwater.

    Mobile sources of nitrogen oxides — cars, boats and yard equipment — create emissions close to the ground, contributing four times more nitrogen deposition to the local watershed than regional power plants releasing nitrogen from stacks. According to the SBEP report, CO2 emissions in the Sarasota-Bradenton metro area are up 61% since 1990.

    SBEP’s plan details the destruction and damage to the bay but also notes progress in recovery and charts corrective actions.

    The action plan includes:

    • Supporting monitoring of water quality;
    • Strategizing to surpass water quality standards;
    • Improving hydrology for more natural flows;
    • Reducing pollutants from stormwaters and wastewaters;
    • Reducing atmospheric nitrogen deposition;’
    • Supporting measures to better understand, monitor and reduce harmful algal blooms.

    As of July 8, more than 80 projects were planned to improve water quality in the Greater Sarasota Bay Estuarine System.

    Manatee County was working with the Southwest Florida Water Management District to use federal RESTORE ACT funds to develop watershed management plans and SBEP was advocating for small, green infrastructure practices to reduce polluted stormwater and wastewater from reaching the bay.

    Such practices include better managing rainfall, one of our most abundant natural resources, by planting and preserving canopy trees to intercept rain before it hits the ground, connecting rain barrels and cisterns, creating rain gardens to allow rainfall to evaporate or percolate into the ground and establishing stormwater parks.

    The objectives and ideas outlined in SBEP’s plan motivate.

    We’re responsible for the damage in the bay.

    And we’re also responsible for the recovery.

    On the web

    The Sarasota Bay Estuary Program’s 208-page comprehensive conservation and management plan can be downloaded at sarasotabay.org.

  • Sojourn south begins for snowbirds

    She saw flocks of Canada geese flying overhead.

    Then she noticed fewer warblers in the backyard.

    And my mom knew it was time to purchase a ticket on her flight south, planning a mid-October departure from Illinois for Florida.

    You can’t tell from the temperatures on AMI, but you can tell from the calendar and an uptick in the number of songbirds that the fall migration is underway.

    The leaders of nonprofit groups on the island sensed the change, as they’re ramping up programs and events to cater to seasonal residents just beginning to flock to the island.

    And birders sensed the change, finding more blue-gray gnatcatchers populating Leffis Key this month than last.

    And who hasn’t noticed the European starlings crowding the branches at the top of the Norfolk pines?

    Still, we’re weeks from peak migration and the big arrival of orioles, grosbeaks and wood warblers, wrens, vireos, thrushes, buntings, hawks, eagles.

    One of the best resources for tracking migrations in the fall and spring is BirdCast, powered by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Colorado State University and University of Massachusetts-Amherst at birdcast.info.

    The site contains migration maps and analysis, providing visitors with forecasts for nocturnal migration three hours after sunset and updating them through the night, about every six hours.

    The color-coded maps show migration intensity — high, medium, low and none — while the forecasts provide estimates of the number of birds on the move.

    On Sept. 9, BirdCast predicted over half a billion birds would be flying during the three hours after sunset.

    Another big migratory push occurred Sept. 13 and again Sept. 21.

    Some of the birds traveling south will fly over Florida or stop in Florida while in route to even warmer regions.

    For others, Florida will be their winter destination.

    Leffis Key, located at Coquina Bayside and a stop on the Great Florida Birding Trail, is a good birding spot at any time of year, but in the late fall or early winter, the county preserve is a birder’s paradise.

    On a summer day, dozens of species might be observed at Leffis Key. On a day in late fall, the species count might be 100 — or more.

    Other birding spots to chirp about include Neal and Perico preserves on Perico Island and Robinson Preserve in west Bradenton.

    Happy fall, orioles.

    Hello, white pelicans.

    Welcome back, Mom.

    And happy fall, islanders.

  • Press for manatee protections

    Question authority.

    We said so four years ago, when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service moved to reduce the protected status for manatees.

    The FWS in March 2017 issued a press release headlined, “Manatee reclassified from endangered to threatened as habitat improves and population expands.”

    The government agency declared efforts were bringing the “giant sea cow back from the brink of extinction” and noted the estimated population of 6,620 Florida manatees marked a dramatic turnaround from the 1970s, when only a few hundred manatees existed.

    “On the heels of Manatee Appreciation Day, the U.S. Department of the Interior announced the downlisting of the West Indian manatee from endangered to threatened. Notable increases in manatee populations and improvements in its habitat allowed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to change the species’ status under the Endangered Species Act,” the news release stated.

    What a strange way to show appreciation for the species.

    Sure, we’d seen improvements in manatee numbers, but four years ago, we asked in our letters to then Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke: Why change course now?

    At the Save the Manatee Club, executive director Patrick Rose warned, “A federal reclassification at this time will seriously undermine the chances of securing the manatee’s long-term survival. With the new federal administration threatening to cut 75% of regulations, including those that protect our wildlife and air and water quality, the move to downlist manatees can only be seen as a political one.”

    U.S. Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Longboat Key, also was among those who objected four years ago to the downlisting of the manatee. He tweeted from @VernBuchanan: “@usfws decision to weaken manatee protections HUGELY disappointing. Bad for manatee, bad for Fla. Will contact #secretaryzinke!”

    Now he’s needing to contact U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland to press for reinstating the “endangered” status for manatees.

    Buchanan, June 14, called on the FWS to upgrade the manatee’s status under the Endangered Species Act in a letter referring to a likely record number of manatee deaths in 2021 and cautioning that the “fate of Florida’s iconic mammal” is at stake.

    According to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 761 manatees had died in the first half of 2021. The annual record for manatee deaths in the state is 804, set in 2018.

    Also, the FWC estimates there are about 6,500 manatees in the southeastern United States, 120 fewer than estimated when the federal government downlisted the species in 2017.

    “When a species becomes extinct, it is lost forever,” Buchanan said. “We cannot afford to let that happen to these iconic residents of Florida and the state’s official marine mammal.”

    “Given the alarming surge in manatee deaths this year, upgrading their ESA designation is critical,” added the congressman, whose district includes Anna Maria Island.

    Manatees face multiple threats, but Buchanan cited broad consensus among conservationists that water quality — degraded habitat, growing pollution and increased harmful algal blooms that kill seagrass — “are the driving force behind the rapidly growing death rate.”

    Disappearing seagrass means starving animals, and there have been reports of many dead, emaciated manatees washing up on Florida shores.

    The government should guarantee the highest level of protection for the state’s gentle giants.

    Pressure authority.

    Manatee’s manatee casualties

    The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission reported 761 manatee deaths in the state Jan. 1-June 11, including seven in Manatee County:

    • March 12, Manatee River, natural, other;
    • April 9, Critical Bayou, Palmetto, not necropsied;
    • April 9, Braden River, perinatal;
    • April 25, Terra Ceia Bay, Palmetto, watercraft collision;
    • May 22, Manatee River, Bradenton, perinatal;
    • May 30, Palma Sola Bay, Bradenton, watercraft collision;
    • June 8, Palma Sola Bay, Bradenton, perinatal.
  • Housing crunch for tortoises

    Housing crunch for tortoises

    Florida’s best-known tortoise is in a race — for its continued existence.

    The gopher tortoise — its range includes much of the state — is a candidate for possible protection under the federal Endangered Species Act and is classified as “threatened” by the state.

    The primary threat to the gopher tortoise is habitat loss through habitat destruction, fragmentation and degradation, according to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.

    Yet, habitat destruction continues. It’s common enough that the FWC operates a relocation program and identifies “recipient sites” for animals, usually private land in which the owner is paid per tortoise.

    The relocation program began in 2007 and between 2007 and 2020, about 56,000 gopher tortoises were moved to “recipient sites.”

    Earlier in 2021, the FWC issued a public plea for property owners to provide habitat for gopher tortoises because suitable shelter is becoming more difficult to find.

    “For years, the state has enabled sprawl development by simply moving tortoises out of the way,” said Elise Bennett, a senior attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity environmental group. “Now there’s nowhere left to put them.”

    The relocation program is much better than the state’s old program, which allowed developers to bury the animals alive.

    But the program — and potential changes to it — certainly has critics.

    A rule on the books says gopher tortoises cannot be relocated more than 100 miles north or south of their original burrows, the burrows being threatened by development.

    The rule was enacted to ensure tortoises are relocated to areas that support long-term viability and genetic integrity.

    But FWC executive director Eric Sutton earlier this year issued an executive order waiving the rule for 90 days, during which time the commission is expected to consider a longer-term change to the rule.

    “Gopher tortoises are caught in a habitat loss crisis, yet the commission is suggesting what amounts to a temporary storage solution,” said the center’s Bennett.

    The order authorizes wildlife officials to approve “temporary relocation” options, enabling the detention of gopher tortoises in on-site pens while developers push ahead with construction.

    The order also allows for the “temporary offsite” relocation of the animals to public lands.

    George Heinrich, executive director of the Florida Turtle Conservation Trust, said the order diminishes the conservation outlook for gopher tortoises.

    “We have long urged the commission to be more proactive with their efforts to conserve imperiled tortoise and freshwater turtle species,” Heinrich said in a statement. “The fact that our state wildlife agency has allowed it to get to this point is shameful. They simply must do better.”

    The issue is on the agenda for a Dec. 15-16 FWC meeting in Destin.

    The agenda also includes a discussion of rules regarding imperiled beach-nesting birds and an update on a record number of manatee deaths in 2021.

    People can comment through Friday, Dec. 10, via myfwc.com, where they also can find more information about gopher tortoise “recipient sites.”

    Did you know?

    Gopher tortoises can live up to 80 years.

    In Florida, the animals live in dry oak sandhills, scrub, dry hammock, pine flatwoods, dry prairie, coastal grasslands and sand dunes.

    On the island, they can be found in the coastal dunes, where they create burrows that provide protection from predators and the elements.

    The burrows vary in size — from 3-50 feet long and 9-25 feet deep — and provide refuge for about 350 other species, including frogs, snakes, mice, skunks, foxes, rabbits, armadillos, owls, lizards and more.

    The tortoises forage on grasses, palmetto berries, fruits and flowers.

    The chief threat to the tortoises is habitat destruction, but herbicides also cause harm.

    Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

  • Arriving to AMI, an anniversary

    Arriving to AMI, an anniversary

    We have our origin stories.

    And many of us who’ve moved from place to place have our arrival stories, the recollections of when we arrived to arrange our lives in a new or unfamiliar location.

    Some people might remember the year they settled in a new home or a new community. Others might also recall the month. Some might remember the full date.

    I remember details of some arrivals better than others. As for my arrival to Anna Maria Island after leaving Chicago, I remember the year, the month, the date and the day of the week I came to live here.

    I even remember the hour of my arrival.

    I began calling Anna Maria home at 5 p.m. Friday, Sept. 2, 2005.

    Weeks earlier, I had visited Anna Maria Island by car, at night, for about five minutes before returning to Bradenton to conclude my successful job interview over a meal at a restaurant that no longer exists.

    And my wife Connie had never visited.

    We had found our landlord and apartment in The Islander classifieds, which is also how Connie found her first job in Anna Maria.

    Back then, every square foot on our little island was not digitally mapped for the general public and maybe only the local news and chamber of commerce were publishing chamber-perfect photographs on the internet. So we didn’t know what to expect when we drove north on Gulf Drive past Pine Avenue and turned into the parking outside our duplex.

    From the driveway, we could see the Gulf of Mexico and hear the waves.

    So we called our landlord to let him know we’d arrived and then walked to the boardwalk leading past the dunes to the beach.

    We could have counted our footsteps from the driveway to the beach if we hadn’t been so excited by the natural beauty of our new home.

    There were just a few people on the shore and, because everyone knew everyone, our landlord walked right up to us — the newbies, the arrivals but never strangers on AMI — and introduced himself.

    He handed us the keys to the one-bedroom apartment where we would live for 13 years and I knew we had won a “luck lottery.”

    Connie and I walked north on the beach, as far as we could, as the beach was not as wide as it is today, and then we went “home” to dress for a steak dinner at a waterfront restaurant, followed by our first “sunset.”

    I’d seen the sun set, of course.

    But the night of Sept. 2, 2005, was the first time I experienced what islanders call “sunset,” a communal happening celebrating the splendor in the sky with the souls on the sand.

    I thought then that I’d go to sunset every night, but started a new job on Labor Day 2005 and often didn’t arrive home until after nightfall.

    All these years later, I savor each sunset that I catch.

    And I still feel like I hit the “luck lottery.”

  • Planting to plating

    Planting to plating

    The idea of creating community gardens on AMI is taking root in Holmes Beach and I dig the enthusiasm.

    The Holmes Beach Parks and Beautification Committee is revisiting the concept of creating a community garden in Veterans Park at city hall, 5801 Marina Drive.

    The Islander reported Nov. 4 that committee members reached consensus to direct city engineer Sage Kamiya to obtain cost estimates to test the concept of a community garden at the park.

    If the committee goes forward and sees success in the small space in the shade of city hall and the Island Library, another community garden may be created on city-owned land abutting Grassy Point Preserve, 3021 Avenue C.

    Both locations present challenges and opportunities.

    It’s fitting to create the test garden at Veterans Park, as today’s community garden campaigns seem in the spirit of the Victory Gardens planted during World War I and World War II.

    With those gardens, communities grew their own produce so other resources could go toward the war effort.

    Today’s community gardens serve different purposes but still create resilient communities, encourage healthy ecosystems, celebrate a connection to the cycle of life and, yes, yield good, nutritious food.

    When working as a reporter in Milwaukee, I covered environmental efforts and organizations, including the budding Victory Garden Initiative launched in 2009.

    VGI operates under the slogan, “This is a grassroots movement. Move grass. Grow food.”

    Their campaign has led volunteers to grow community gardens, launch an urban farm, create fruit orchards, train growers, establish nutritional education programs and inspire similar work in other Wisconsin cities and beyond that state’s borders.

    The Holmes Beach committee is in the conceptual stage of planning and the first community plots may be butterfly gardens that provide direct sustenance for pollinators rather than people.

    But I do hope the island community can rally around the old concept of Victory Gardens, as growing food reminds us of the earth, reintegrates us with ecology and guides our culture toward a sustainable, abundant future.

    I’ve noticed in the supermarkets the higher prices on produce and also observed a scarcity of some fresh food.

    I’ve also heard the old stories of islanders providing for themselves — fresh fish and shellfish from the Gulf and bays, fruit and nuts from trees and bushes, vegetables growing in plots on the southeast sides of AMI cottages.

    Let’s rally around the cause.

  • Collecting treasure

    Collecting treasure

    My three treasure chests line a wall in my living room.

    They’re wooden, stand about 6 feet tall and have five shelves each.

    And they’re filled with all types of jewels.

    The value of my treasure is immeasurable, priceless, even though the insurance payout on any loss might amount to less than $100.

    My treasure consists of about 500 books — paperback and hardcover, fiction and nonfiction, classic literature and easy beach reads.

    One bit of treasure cost 75 cents in 1972. The old Scholastic Inc. version of Robert Louis Stevenson’s “Treasure Island” sits on a top shelf, with other collectibles from childhood.

    I need only to see the paperback’s spine to remember Jim Hawkin’s tale and to think, “Treasure, books are treasure.”

    I wouldn’t exchange my old, tattered copy of Jack Kerouac’s “On the Road” for cold cash.

    I’d rather have my new copy of Philip Kennedy’s “The Bird: The Great Age of Avian Illustration” than a strand of pearls.

    This time of year, my treasure grows. For at least a decade, my wife has given me a “Christmas book.”

    Usually, I identify my “Christmas book” while reading the books section in the Sunday edition of The New York Times, tear out the page and give Connie “the clue.”

    But this year, I struggled to choose one title.

    “The Bird” isn’t on my Christmas list because that gem of a hardcover got added to the treasure shelves earlier in the year, but finalists included:

    • “Beatrix Potter’s Gardening Life: The Plants and Places that Inspired the Classic Children’s Tales,” by Marta McDowell and full of watercolors and sketches, letters and notes by a blossoming writer and gardener.
    • “Southeast Foraging: 120 Wild and Flavorful Edibles from Angelic to Wild Plums” by Chris Bennett and providing a seasonal guide to identifying safe plants for harvest.
    • “The Nature of Oaks: The Rich Ecology of our Most Essential Native Trees” by Douglas W. Tallamy and about the champions of carbon sequestration, soil stabilization and watershed management.
    • “Botanical Art Techniques” by the American Society of Botanical Artists and about illustrating flowers and other plants.

    But ultimately, I shouted, “This is the book!” to Connie when I heard an NPR story about “The Most Dangerous Book: The Battle for James Joyce’s Ulysses.”

    Author Kevin Birmingham’s prize-winning story is about the creation and publication of a masterpiece, a revolutionary novel, about a day in the life of Leopold Bloom and so very much more.

    Yes, there will be treasure under my Christmas tree.

  • Naturally inspiring AMI

    Naturally inspiring AMI

    “Why can’t we pet him?” my nephew John asked.

    The man who’s now 22 was then an 8-year-old boy, standing at a railing around Snooty the manatee’s pool at a Bradenton aquarium.

    John would return year after year, visiting Anna Maria Island from Grayslake, Illinois, for family vacations and he came to understand why a boy can’t pet a manatee.

    He and his sister, Jackie, and their cousin Pippa had the good fortune of weeklong stays with the extended family in an island rental before hectic schedules disrupted the tradition. Their younger cousins Georgie and Gavin didn’t experience those good times, those inspiring times.

    John is now a Purdue University grad and is working his first real job. Jackie is a sophomore at Loyola University in New Orleans, pursuing a major in environmental studies. And Pip is a teen with a middle-school life.

    I know they learned to respect nature during their stays on Anna Maria Island and visits to wild places like Myakka River State Park.

    They encountered alligators — and ran.

    They celebrated sightings of dolphins and manatees and hoped every holiday to see a shark.

    They turned for a week from selfie photography to shooting seascapes and landscapes.

    They laughed at diving pelicans and waddling royal terns.

    Through trial and error, they understood how the wind carries their kites from the beach.

    They figured out how to catch anoles and also learned the first rule of being in nature — look, don’t touch.

    And they eavesdropped on their wine-sipping grownups searching for a green flash at sunset.

    For all that those kids experienced in our natural spaces on their Thanksgiving holidays, I’m thankful.

    I’m also thankful for the people who provided guidance and instruction to young vacationers on AMI, especially my niblings.

    Anna Maria Island Turtle Watch’s Suzi Fox introduced the kids to the ways of sea turtles.

    They learned from Keep Manatee Beautiful volunteers about fun activities like sand-sculpting but also the necessity of recycling and coastal cleanups.

    They spent time on the old Anna Maria City Pier, where bait shop worker Jesus Rosario became a pal, talking with them about the way fish move and the heroics of Roberto Clemente.

    At the FISH Preserve, they learned from a couple of Cortezians that sweet tea makes everything better, including heat and humidity and the sting of no-see-ums and mosquitoes.

    And at Island Gallery West, painters provided them lessons in capturing the colors of the sky and water and a sculptor talked about clay and earth.

    Yes, so thankful.

    Happy Thanksgiving.

  • Reading the bold print

    Reading the bold print

    The objectives are stated in bold, capital letters and numbered, so there’s no mistaking their importance.

    OBJECTIVE 1: PROTECT, RESTORE AND ENHANCE THE DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE OF NATIVE FISH.

    OBJECTIVE 2: PROTECT, RESTORE AND ENHANCE THE DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE OF NATIVE SHELLFISH.

    OBJECTIVE 3: MONITOR AND PROTECT THREATENED, ENDANGERED AND VULNERABLE WILDLIFE.

    Consider these objectives for Sarasota Bay when you read the next report on a record number of manatee mortalities in Florida or catch the news on local red tide blooms.

    Consider these objectives when you come across a dead stingray on the beach or see a dead pelican entangled in fishing line at a pier.

    Until the end of the month, the Sarasota Bay Estuary Program is collecting public comments on its draft comprehensive conservation and management plan, which can be downloaded at sarasotabay.org.

    The plan identifies progress and failure in revitalizing the bay, listing threats and identifying strategies related to water quality, watershed habitats, and fish and wildlife.

    Diverse bay habitats — wetlands, reefs, seagrass meadows and tidal tributaries — teem with fish, dolphins, manatees, sea turtles and crustaceans.

    For years — 10,000 years — the bay’s population has sustained human life.

    In return, we’ve overdeveloped and overharvested, polluted the water, introduced invasive species and spurred climate change.

    Now we’re called on to deliver better returns to the bay.

    SBEP’s draft plan calls for the following to protect and restore the diversity and abundance of native fish:

    • Research to fill fisheries data gaps, including information on migration barriers, harmful algal blooms and climate change impact;
    • Explore the effectiveness of stock enhancement — the raising of fish in a hatchery and releasing them to supplement existing populations;
    • Promote angling practices that increase conservation and prevent marine waste.

    SBEP’s draft plan calls for the following to protect, restore and enhance the diversity and abundance of native shellfish:

    • Research on shellfish habitat needs and vulnerabilities to climate change;
    • Research to understand the benefits of shellfish stock enhancement to improve water quality, habitat and native populations.

    Sarasota Bay and tidal tributaries support oysters, scallops, crabs, shrimp, lobsters and clams, all of which benefit ecosystems.

    To protect threatened, endangered and vulnerable wildlife, SBEP’s draft plan calls for continued monitoring of dolphins and manatees, as well as strengthening and enforcing protections.

    The bay is home to about 160 resident bottlenose dolphins threatened by natural predators, such as sharks, but also boat collisions, illegal feeding, entanglement and ingestion of fishing gear and pollution.

    The bay is home to Florida manatees threatened by cold snaps but also boat collisions, entanglement, habitat loss and pollution.

    Fourteen islands in the bay system support 18 colonial-nesting species of birds — herons, egrets, spoonbills — threatened by entanglement and fishing hooks, human disturbance, pollution and habitat loss due to erosion from boat wakes, storms and sea level rise.

    Audubon Florida keeps population counts of these birds and documented a decline in nesting pairs in the bay area from 2015 to 2019: 95 nesting pairs of snowy egrets in 2015 compared with 70 in 2019, 65 nesting pairs of little blue herons in 2015 and 15 in 2019; 75 nesting pairs of cattle egret in 2015 and 14 in 2019; 120 nesting pairs of white ibis in 2015 and zero in 2019.

    “Efforts to reverse declines and stabilize populations of these and other birds include critical habitat protection and restoration,” reads the draft report.

    To achieve this goal, the town of Longboat Key placed Whale Key and Town Islands in the conservation care of the Audubon Society.

    “No trespassing” signs went up.

    And, yes, birds came down to roost.

  • Celebrating a FLA-nniversary

    Celebrating a FLA-nniversary

    Tacked to my office bulletin board is a gift certificate to a beachside restaurant.

    The sticky note attached reads: “Use for Florida anniversary.”

    The anniversary — marking the day my wife and I moved from Chicago to Anna Maria Island — arrives Sept. 2.

    Weeks earlier in 2005, I landed an editing job at a local newspaper and resigned my position at a paper in Chicago, where at my sendoff party an Elvis impersonator performed “Always on My Mind,” and my coworkers gave me an iPod classic — advertised as “1,000 songs in your pocket.”

    Connie and I left Chicago Aug. 29, 2005, the trunk of our Saturn packed with keepsakes and clothes and the back seat holding three cats in their carriers and aquarium fish in a bucket of water.

    The day we left, Hurricane Katrina hit with devastating force on the Gulf coast in Mississippi and Louisiana.

    So we traveled southeast, through Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia and into Florida, stopping to say “hello” and “goodbye” to family along the way.

    I think of us traveling with real speed on the interstates, but my datebook suggests otherwise. Now, when we make the trip from Chicago, we accomplish in three days what took five days to drive in 2005.

    We made our arrival at the new Gulf Drive apartment in the late afternoon on a Friday, with time enough to settle the cats and fish before enjoying a steak dinner at a beach restaurant and then catching the first of many sunsets on Anna Maria Island.

    I’d seen other sunsets in other states.

    But that night was the first night I experienced what islanders call “sunset,” a communal happening celebrating the splendor in the sky with the souls on the sand.

    A lot has changed since Sept. 2, 2005 — on the island and in my life, for better, for worse.

    I came to The Islander about a year after my move to Anna Maria Island and since then, I’ve helped publish about 780 issues of this paper, reporting on changes, developments, news.

    A few weeks ago, the paper contained an obituary for Jay Erickson, the very man who handed my wife and me the keys to our Anna Maria apartment and, as our landlord, the first person to welcome us to the island.

    He was a man who traveled and knew the world, an accomplished man.

    He was a family man, with relations who established their own lives and made their memories on Anna Maria Island.

    And he was an islander. He walked the beach, watched the sunsets, traveled by bicycle, talked about ecology and shook a fist at the three-story “monstrosity” across the street from our apartment that went up where a cottage once stood.

    As I approach my next Florida anniversary, I’m thinking about then and now, tracing the change and looking for what’s the same.

    “Sunset” is the same on AMI, even as every sunset is different.

  • Creature feature

    Creature feature

    I pulled the blanket up to my chin and watched the shadows on the bedroom wall as the seconds ticked toward midnight.

    It’s been years since I’ve been too frightened to close my eyes and fall asleep, but the screaming at the end of episode five of “Midnight Mass” spooked me.

    If we still gathered around water coolers at work, I’d be talking about the binge-worthy Netflix horror show that arrived for streaming the month before Halloween.

    Curious?

    The terror takes place on Crockett Island, a small, isolated island accessible only by ferry.

    The characters include a charismatic priest, a religious fanatic, a host of fishing families, a disillusioned sheriff and an “angel” that looks a lot like the demonic vampire creatures of myth, with claws, fangs and massive batlike wings.

    “Midnight Mass” is a supernatural tale influenced by nature, like so much we associate with Halloween — great pumpkins, a silvery full moon, crying ravens, howling wolves, blood-sucking bats and prowling black cats.

    A couple of years ago, to celebrate Halloween, I took a road trip to the Lower Suwannee National Wildlife Refuge in Chiefland after reading about Swamp Ape sightings.

    Florida’s answer to Bigfoot, the Swamp Ape, is a human-animal hybrid said to be about 8 feet tall, smelly and an inhabitant of Suwannee’s pine forests and swamps.

    I didn’t come across the Swamp Ape, and, honestly, I need not travel any distance to find some of the state’s scarier critters and creatures.

    They can be found here in Manatee County.

    • Flesh-eating bacteria. Vibrio vulnificus is a naturally occurring bacteria found in warm, salty waters such as the Gulf of Mexico and surrounding bays.

    Concentrations of the bacteria are higher when the water is warmer.

    Necrotizing fasciitis and severe infections with Vibrio vulnificus are rare, but they do occur and can be fatal in humans.

    • Cane toad. Invasive cane toads are reddish-brown to grayish-brown with a light-yellow or beige belly.

    They have enlarged glands behind the eyes, which angle downward on the shoulders. These glands secrete a potent milky-white toxin — bufotoxin.

    The toxin can kill animals that bite or feed on the toads, including pets, as well as irritate the skin and burn the eyes of people who handle the animals.

    • New Guinea flatworm. The nonnative New Guinea flatworm is a predatory, terrestrial flatworm that averages 1.5 to 5 inches in length and has a shiny, dark brown/black body with a pale stripe running down the middle.

    They are a potential host for the rat lungworm parasite that can be transmitted to humans.

    Also, the flatworms regurgitate stomach contents upon handling, causing skin irritation.

    Ick.

    • Vultures. I’m amused by turkey and black vultures — protected at the state and federal levels — but I know some people are afraid of the birds.

    The vultures, bigger than raptors, can chew porch screens and shingles as easily as they can tear at carrion along the causeway.

    They also can spew projectile vomit as a defense mechanism.

    • Alligator. A sign at a stormwater retention area in Bradenton Beach warns of alligators, but you won’t find the reptiles on Anna Maria Island.

    You will find the opportunistic feeders inland, especially at east county preserves and parks.

    And, while you probably know about the alligator’s big bite and death roll, are you aware that the alligator’s mouth is full of microorganisms that contain life-threatening bacteria?

    Of course, the likelihood of being attacked is slim. We pose greater harm to the American alligator than the federally protected “threatened” species poses to people.

    • Fire ant. My feet are scarred from an attack of red imported fire ants by the beach in Anna Maria about a decade ago.

    The ants may nest under patio slabs, in lawns, under edges of sidewalks, foundations, concrete driveways and electrical boxes.

    After a rain, the colony might move to higher ground to take refuge from saturated soil.

    In my case, the ants moved from the soggy ground to my feet, delivering the bite and sting of a venom that exhibits potent necrotoxic activity.

    Ask yourself: Would you rather come across a black cat under a full moon or fire ants at high noon?

  • ‘America the beautiful’

    ‘America the beautiful’

    Many in America observe July 4 customs — picnics, parades and fireworks orchestrated to the “1812 Overture.”

    And some keep a July 5 tradition. They walk a section of beach or circle a parking lot at a boat ramp to collect litter. The cleanups may be organized by a city or a nonprofit in some communities or they may be conducted by individuals equipped with gloves, garbage bags and litter sticks.

    Litter increases on holiday weekends on Anna Maria Island, but litter is a problem every day, here and elsewhere. We’ve probably plagued the planet with our litter since the beginning of our time, and today, according to a new Keep America Beautiful study, about 90% of people in the United States agree that litter is a problem in their community.

    Letters to The Islander and complaints at Anna Maria, Bradenton Beach and Holmes Beach city halls support the public opinion survey. Even when parking or tourism is said to be the concern, litter usually is a factor in the complaint: Ban parking on residential roads because people throw their garbage in our yards. Stop bringing so many tourists to AMI because they trash the beach.

    But why do people litter?

    KAB’s study provides an understanding of the behavior of litters as well as documents the quantity, composition and sources of litter across the United States. The report follows up on a 2009 study and builds on a history of science-based research started in 1969 by KAB, which has 700 affiliates, including our own Keep Manatee Beautiful.

    Some positive findings in the study:

    • The amount of roadside litter is down 54% since 2009.
    • The amount of fast-food packaging, soda containers and construction debris dumped along roadsides has decreased since 2009.
    • The cigarette butt continues to be the most littered item but the number of littered butts is down 70% since 2009.

    Some negative findings:

    • Littered beer containers, water bottles and cardboard increased since 2009.
    • There was twice as much litter from alcoholic beverage containers as from non-alcoholic beverage containers.
    • Each mile of road or waterway in the United States contains about 2,000 pieces of litter.

    “Litter” is improperly managed waste.

    And “littering” is a person’s behavior that results in misplaced waste.

    To deal with litter in America — or just on AMI — requires changing behavior but also changing infrastructure, business operations, services and legislation.

    KAB’s research found that states where deposits must be paid on bottles outperformed other states in reducing litter. Take a cue, Florida.

    KAB asked in a survey, “When have you seen people litter?” and about 59% of respondents answered, “When there is no trash can nearby.”

    I can tell you, I’ve been in public spaces on the island and walked many steps in unsuccessful searches for trash or recycling cans.

    And take a look at the litter along the Palma Sola Causeway, the Kingfish Boat Ramp or Bayfront Park on a Sunday evening. A lot of what becomes litter often was garbage bagged and set beside an already overflowing trash can.

    Keep America Beautiful calculated that there are about 50 billion pieces of litter on the ground in the United States.

    So if everyone ventured outside and picked up 152 pieces of litter, there’d be no litter left and we’d have a more beautiful America, but that’s provided we invest in the education needed to change behavior and the infrastructure needed to accommodate more conscientious citizens.

    About Keep America Beautiful

    The nonprofit, established in 1953, aims to improve and beautify communities, with a goal to end littering and improve recycling.

    The affiliate Keep Manatee Beautiful conducts regular cleanups on Anna Maria Island, as well as promotes special events and activities, including National and Florida Arbor Day observances.

  • Massive environmental march a prelude to U.N. meeting

    The alarm has sounded for years. Now, a draft U.N. report on the environment warns that global warming is here, caused by people, unquestionably dangerous and possibly irreversible.

    With this news, activists from across the country will converge on New York City on Sept. 21 for what could become the largest climate change march in history — the People’s Climate March.

    “Thousands of people from across the world, from all walks of life, will stand as one calling for global climate action,” said Frances Beinecke of the Natural Resources Defense Council. “This event will show the world’s most powerful leaders that people are united in their support of this cause and want to see ambitious climate action today. It is time for world leaders to rise to the challenge.”

    In late August, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change circulated the draft of a 127-page report on the state and the future of the planet. “Continued emission of greenhouse gases will cause further warming and long-lasting changes in all components of the climate system, increasing the likelihood of severe, pervasive and irreversible impacts for people and ecosystems,” the paper states.

    The report warns that if the world continues to pump greenhouse gases at an accelerating rate, it’s likely that by mid-century temperatures will increase by about another 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit compared to temperatures from 1986 to 2005. And by the end of the century, that scenario will bring temperatures that are about 6.7 degrees warmer.

    “Climate change is the crisis of our times,” said Bridget Burns, advocacy and communications director of the Women’s Environment and Development Organization. “For too long now, political posturing, greed and complacency in ‘business as usual’ has taken precedent over justice, equality, action and ambition. But change is not something which you wait for, it’s something that you make happen.”

    WEDO is one of the many organizations involved in the march, which is being held to demand action from world leaders who, in the fal,l will begin 18 months of international negotiations. Climate negotiators will meet in New York and Copenhagen this fall, then head to Peru in December to work on a global climate deal. In September 2015, world leaders will again meet in New York to adopt the Sustainable Development Goals. Three months later, leaders will gather in Paris to negotiate a climate treaty.

    Some 750 groups — from the largest transit workers union in New York City to a coalition of Buddhist monks — are involved in staging the march.

    The scale of organizing rivals a major electoral campaign, with thousands of volunteers, daily phone-banks and canvases in New York City, and a major online operation to turn out people for the march that begins at Columbus Circle.

    Trains and hundreds of buses are bringing people to New York, including dedicated trains from San Francisco and D.C. and buses from multiple points outside of New York, including Madison. Much of the recruitment is taking place on college campuses.

    “Young people are coming to the streets of New York in huge numbers to stand up and say we’ve had enough — we’re not going to sit back and wait for politicians to save our future,” said Adam Hasz of the environmental group SustainUS. “Instead, we’re on the front lines fighting extractive industries and proposing just policies to confront climate change and its impacts on the most vulnerable. The People’s Climate March will show that a better future is not only possible, but underway.”

    In August, at a warehouse in Bushwick, artists were at work creating giant sculptures, floats and banners for the march. Others were designing posters for a subway campaign.

    “The energy buzzing around the march organizing headquarters here in New York is palpable,” said May Boeve, executive director of the activist group 350.org. “Every day, volunteers are hitting the phones, streets and Internet to turn people out. …This effort has already helped build the type of movement infrastructure we need to take the climate fight to the next level.”

    Hundreds of events coincide with the NYC march: 

    • In New Delhi, people will take to the streets on Sept. 20 to demand a renewable energy revolution.

    • In Australia, organizers are expecting hundreds of individual events to take place across the country.

    • In London, groups are planning a march through the city to the steps of Parliament.

    • In Berlin, three parallel marches will combine forces in a festival.

    • In Paris, local groups will create the Paris Marche pour le Climat, with parades, marches and bicycle rides planned across the bridges of the Seine.

    • Events are also being organized in Kathmandu, Rio, Sao Paulo, Jakarta, Dublin, Manila, Seoul, Mumbai, Istanbul, Ghana, Kenya, DRC, Nigeria, Guinea and Johannesburg.

    Marching out of Madison

    Activists with 350 Madison are organizing a Wisconsin contingent for the People’s Climate March in New York on Sept. 21.

    “We will bring our message that Wisconsin is becoming a major battleground in the fight against climate change,” said a statement from the grassroots environmental group.

    350 Madison said utilities in Wisconsin are proposing “billing schemes that are a huge detriment to renewable energy and energy efficiency” and that the Canadian company Enbridge Energy “plans to expand the Line 61 pipeline, which traverses our beautiful state from Superior to Delavan, to carry more toxic tar sands than what the controversial Keystone XL pipeline would carry.”

    The grassroots group also raised concerns for “trains, carrying the potentially explosive Bakken oil,” traveling through many Wisconsin communities.

    Get connected

    For more information, details on travel scholarships or to purchase tickets for the bus trip from Madison to New York City, go online to http://350madison.wordpress.com/upcoming-events/peoples-climate-march-nyc/.

  • Keeping watch over Tampa Bay

    Keeping watch over Tampa Bay

    “Life’s a beach” is one motto on Anna Maria Island.

    So is “get ’er done,” a saying I’d not heard until I went to work for The Islander about 15 years ago.

    A lot of folks I know are more in the “get ’er done” mindset these days.

    They’re righting a struggling business or organization more than a year into the coronavirus pandemic.

    They’re lining up for their vaccines or arranging for friends and family to get a shot.

    They’re balancing, juggling, striving.

    And, looking out for the best interests of Anna Maria Island and the surrounding waters, they’re rallying to act in response to an environmental crisis at Piney Point.

    Piney Point in northeast Manatee County is the site of a defunct phosphate production operation. The plant ceased operations in 1999 and has since been managed to maintain and monitor the pollution left behind — a radioactive phosphogypsum stack and wastewater containment system.

    In late March, the site management found a leak in the containment system and, seeking to avoid a catastrophic collapse of the system, asked the state to authorize the release of polluted water — a mix of seawater, rainwater and wastewater that contains phosphorous, nitrogen and other materials.

    You’ll hear and read references to this water being “nutrient-rich,” but pollution isn’t like fresh produce and nutrient-rich is no bonus.

    So island officials are ready and on watch. Anna Maria commissioners voted April 8 to declare a local state of emergency while Holmes Beach officials are creating a water quality committee.

    The Anna Maria Island Chamber of Commerce is sending out updates regarding Piney Point just as it stepped up to disseminate information last spring when the pandemic hit.

    Island businesses are providing assistance, lobbying, and educating.

    How many of us watched via Twitter as Chuck Wolfe, CEO of the Chiles Group of restaurants on Anna Maria Island and Longboat Key and a Parrish farm, guided Florida Agriculture Nikki Fried on Piney Point and the importance of water quality to “Fresh from Florida” business.

    “We’re watching the water rise. We’re watching the quality change,” Wolfe said. “We’re doing our part. …The involvement of business, the involvement of the government, the involvement to making sure that for the entire state this is important.”

    Local charter captains and conservationists are on the water, guiding clients to great catches but also keeping watch.

    Anna Maria Island Turtle Watch and Shorebird Monitoring is stepping up — as always. The nonprofit monitors for nesting activity — sea turtles and shorebirds – on the island May 1-Oct. 31, but volunteers are watching our beaches now for signs of sick or dead animals.

    The Center of Anna Maria Island — known for its sports leagues, fitness classes, children’s camps and fun days — also runs a green initiative.

    The center recently formed the Blue Waters Coalition and invites people to help “defend our waters” by installing mini-reefs at their docks or volunteering to collect and analyze water samples or submit beach conditions observations.

    Most recently, in response to the Piney Point crisis, the center offered to help monitor water quality around the island in cooperation with a student-driven research program at Eckerd College.

    “We stand ready,” center director of development Jim McDaniel said April 8 in an email to The Islander.

    We stand ready.

    All this movement is taking place, so perhaps someday we can get back to more of “life’s a beach” — and “it’s 5 o’clock somewhere,” too.

    Petition in circulation

    Sierra Club Florida is circulating a petition asking the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to do more to address the threat of phosphate mining and the waste that’s produced.

    The chapter launched the petition drive as polluted wastewater from the defunct Piney Point phosphate site was being discharged into Tampa Bay to avoid a large-scale breach and collapse of the phosphogypsum stack system.

    The EPA and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection maintain the wastewater meets water quality standards and is not radioactive.

    However, phosphogypsum is radioactive and the stack system remains a threat.

    The petition is online at sierraclub.org.

  • Over the rainbow for outdoors

    Over the rainbow for outdoors

    My family celebrates rainbows in June.

    We fly rainbow flags.

    We wear rainbow-themed T-shirts.

    And we go looking for rainbows.

    We’re just over the moon for rainbows in June.

    So I found myself wishing for rain the day after Memorial Day and every day since.

    Rainbows inspire pride, dreams, imagination, curiosity and artistry. To quote a singing frog named Kermit: “Someday we’ll find it, the rainbow connection/The lovers, the dreamers and me.”

    One of my most thoughtful conversations with a young niece was about a rainbow.

    “Have you ever touched a rainbow? I have,” she confided.

    Now that she’s on summer break, I hope she gets the opportunity to search for many rainbows, chase her shadow, scour the shore for shells and tell a ghostly tale at a campfire.

    June is Great Outdoors Month in the United States, an opportunity for exploration, recreation and rejuvenation and, for children, a time to learn outside the classroom or Zoom space.

    The National Association for the Education of Young Children offers guidance on getting outdoors with kids:

    • Join children in the fun if they want you to but always keep an eye on them. Simplicity is the key to establishing safety rules and there is usually no need to restrict children.
    • Let children choose what to explore and see what they do on their own, without offering suggestions. Do they dig? Build? Climb?
    • Ask open-ended questions. Ask kids about their discoveries and don’t pretend to know all the answers. You might even learn something.
    • Any walk can become a nature walk.
    • And shadow play can entertain for hours, provided there’s light to create shadows.

    I’ve walked along Gulf Drive with a crowd of nieces and nephews and our shadows and traced their shadow outlines on sidewalks.

    Next time we’re together, I might ask my youngest niece if she can feel her shadow.

    And, apart more than a year because of the pandemic, I certainly hope I don’t find that she’s grown too old to touch a rainbow.

    About rainbows

    A traditional rainbow is sunlight spread out into its spectrum of colors and diverted to the eye of the observer by water droplets.

    To see a rainbow:

    • You need to be standing with the sun to your back and the rain in front of you;
    • The sun needs to be less than 42 degrees above the horizon;
    • The sun’s rays must be hitting the raindrops to create the rainbow.

    The colors of the rainbow are red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo and violet.

    When the sun is lower, the rainbow will be higher in the sky.

    Earth is the only planet in the solar system where rainbows occur.

  • Firing up for Father’s Day

    Firing up for Father’s Day

    On Mom’s holiday, we picnicked in a field of wildflowers at Myakka River State Park.

    On Dad’s day, June 20, we’ll fire up the grill in the park.

    She said: Pâte, please.

    He prefers barbecued brisket with a side of steak.

    So Father’s Day will involve turning up the heat on our grill for his protein of choice, corn on the cob, roasted potatoes, seared asparagus, and, to finish, s’mores.

    And we’ll do our best to green the cookout.

    My dad is not what I would call a tree-hugger, but he sends money to the World Wildlife Fund and Sierra Club.

    He grew up on a small farm in western Illinois, where he learned to appreciate what nature can provide and to love his land.

    There was a charcoal grill outside the farmhouse where he grew up and where I visited as a kid during school breaks. Some nights, we roasted hot dogs and toasted marshmallows over the charcoal flames.

    In the backyard of my childhood home, we had a gas grill big enough to cook hot dogs for the high school football team that my dad coached. In the pre-season, after morning practice, the players and coaches gathered in the back yard for lunch — chips, dogs, salads, fruit and soda pop.

    Two grills lasted my entire childhood, but my parents are on their fourth grill in 15 years after buying their condo on the Gulf coast.

    On Father’s Day, we’ll be at my portable, propane-fueled camping grill because we’re heading to a bayfront park.

    I prefer propane to charcoal because it burns cleaner and more efficiently.

    One study from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory concluded that a burner on a gas grill emits about 5.6 pounds of carbon dioxide per hour, contrasted with 11 pounds per hour from cooking over charcoal.

    An argument could be made for using all-natural, lump charcoal, which lacks additives and, made from wood, is a renewable energy source.

    But the easy-to-use instant briquettes release volatile organic compounds and particulate matter into the air, as well as ground-level ozone. They’re made of sawdust, starch, borax, petroleum solvents and sodium nitrate. They’re no-nos.

    So we’ll get cooking with propane, as well as reduce waste by ditching disposables in favor of reusable cutlery, plates and glassware and buy in season.

    Does anyone know where to find locally sourced marshmallows?

  • Not loving lovebugs?

    Not loving lovebugs?

    Love doesn’t keep them together.

    But sex does.

    Yes, lovebugs are at it again, coupling in the air and on window screens, patio furniture and especially vehicles.

    The bugs — a march fly now common to the southeastern United States and Central America — show up in large numbers in late April and May and again in September.

    Lovebugs dig humid spaces and hot surfaces.

    They don’t bite or sting and do us no physical harm.

    Actually, the bugs can be beneficial to us — their pollinators and the larvae feed on decaying vegetation in the landscape.

    Still, people generally don’t show the love for the bugs that can remain paired for days.

    The exceptions might be carwash operators, who get the business generated in the spring and fall, when lovebugs swarm and splatter windshields, clog radiator grills and leave a slightly acidic residue.

    The purveyors of fake news like them, too.

    Lovebugs are native to Central America and likely arrived to the Gulf Coast on ships. Research documents their presence in Louisiana in 1911 and Florida in the late 1940s.

    But check social media forums and you’ll find plenty of posts circulating about “lovebugs” being the result of a genetic experiment gone awry, usually at the University of Florida.

    One variation of the false post reads, “Lovebugs are actually manmade. Scientists were genetically engineering females of a species of insect that would mate with the male mosquito but be sterile and produce no offspring. Unfortunately, they accidentally also created a male lovebug and a pair somehow escaped into the wild. Since the bugs had no natural predators, their numbers quickly exploded into the millions.”

    Another claim plays on historic school rivalry along with false news: “Back when I was a student at Florida State, I was told that lovebugs were accidentally released from a biological experiment station at the University of Florida.”

    A couple of years ago, the Orlando Sentinel reported on the lovebug rumors and quoted a professor who said if the University of Florida had engineered lovebugs, they wouldn’t be black and red. They’d be blue and orange.

    This is interesting, because just yesterday I saw a two-headed spider and can you guess its color?

  • Bloom time

    Bloom time

    Spring just arrived on March 20, but for weeks I’ve been sweeping away signs of the season.

    Tree pollen — yellow, powdery and sticky — is layered so thick on my patio that it looks like splotches of oil paint.

    The live oak flowers on the ground in my backyard are piled so thick they look like the shag carpet popular about the time my condo was built in the 1980s.

    Someone, who would scowl if I used her name, blew her nose the other day and, I’m not April fooling, her nose was filled with tree pollen.

    I suspect we have what’s called a “trigger tree” in the backyard, which can expose an allergy sufferer to 10 times more pollen than another similar tree down the block.

    I asked my allergist about changing my prescription for the season and he replied, “Allergy season is like tourist season in Florida. It’s year-round.”

    Consider this: We endure pollen from oaks and pines October through May, grass pollen April to October and ragweed May through December.

    I guess that covers all 12 months.

    But really, in March and April, the pollen season peaks, providing a reason other than the pandemic to wear face masks.

    The forecast at pollen.com March 25 showed pollen levels at medium-high for the island that day and the day before, with oak, juniper and nettle as top allergens.

    Other culprits this time of year include bayberry and maple.

    Even the beaches aren’t safe havens for hay fever sufferers, as airborne pollen can travel hundreds of miles, and the wild grasses on the shore can contribute to allergies.

    The island’s pollen level throughout March? Not a day below medium-high.

    And the five-day forecast? “High” times five.

    Before moving to Florida from Chicago, I didn’t experience any seasonal allergies. My Florida hay fever may be due to exposure to unfamiliar allergens or simply the onset of seasonal allergies in adulthood, which can occur with rapidity.

    Despite the runny nose, scratchy throat and allergic shiners under my eyes, I do love springtime on and around the island.

    The tabebuia tree, showering bright yellow blooms, is nothing to sneeze at, while the bougainvillea, flaunting pink flowers, and the jacaranda, stunning in a showy purple, can stop me in my tracks.

    Happy spring.

    Did you know?

    Rainy days can provide some relief for allergy sufferers but thunderstorms can intensify pollen levels. Pollen grains can be carried by wind produced in storms and rupture, leading to increased allergic reactions during storms, known as “thunderstorm asthma.”

    Arbor Day ahead

    National Arbor Day is celebrated Friday, April 30.

    The island cities, in partnership with the state and Keep Manatee Beautiful, usually hold tree-planting ceremonies.

    Also, the Arbor Day Foundation offers 10 trees to new members to plant at home or donate to a forest. Species for the area include Eastern red cedar, Eastern redbud, live oak, bald cypress, river birch, white dogwood and crape myrtle.

    For more information, go online to arborday.org.

  • About those oaks

    Keyword: Treehouses.

    I routinely search the archives of the Manatee County Public Library for island-related historical photographs to share with readers.

    I use keywords and categories and usually come up with something interesting, or at least relevant, for the “looking back” feature in The Islander.

    Sometimes I come up with a “wow!” or a “what?” find.

    This past week, for example, I was curious whether any archival photographs of “treehouses” on the island exist in the library’s history bank.

    There are none, but there is a neat image of a treehouse built in 1924 in a large live oak in the 1600 block of Third Avenue East in Bradenton. The structure featured winding stairs and a porch and contained two couches, a gas stove, running water and electric lights.

    Often one search will lead to another and I looked next for “live oak” and quickly came across a transcript of an August 1984 interview with Anna Maria Cobb Riles, a member of one of the early white families to settle on Anna Maria Island.

    The interviewer asked about the island landscape in the early part of the 20th century. “What did the pristine state look like? Were there a lot of pine trees?”

    “No,” Riles replied. “There were not very many pine trees on Anna Maria Island. There were some at the north end and they were cut down and taken away. …

    “But there were other trees, oak groves, with these oak groves just about every mile, lonesome mile, all up and down the island. And they were beautiful things. They were slaughtered. The most you see of an oak grove now is where the school is.”

    There are fewer oaks at Anna Maria Elementary since Riles spoke about the trees in 1984, and there are far fewer live oak, laurels and myrtles across the island than I saw on my arrival just 16 years ago.

    About 26 types of oaks — red and white — grow in Florida, providing shelter and food for wildlife, shade and decoration for humans.

    Globally, there are about 430 species of oak, including 217 species at risk, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species, the world’s most comprehensive inventory of the global conservation status of biological species.

    The list includes 112 species classified as critically endangered, endangered or vulnerable; 105 species classified as near threatened; and 31 estimated to be threatened with extinction.

    The United States has the third-highest number of oak species and the fourth-highest number of threatened species due to changing land use and climate, as well as invasive plants and pests.

    Thankfully, the oak species found on the island are not on the IUCN Red List.

    And yet, if the island’s groves were largely destroyed in the 20th century, do we need a listing to commit to protections in the 21st century?

  • In the ‘red tide’ toolbox

    In the ‘red tide’ toolbox

    “Florida Gulf beaches are closed,” one erroneous Facebook comment read.

    Another made the false claim that “the Gulf is blood-red with red tide.”

    What next? Communist scientists manufactured and released K. brevis from a lab in China?

    Red tide can be a menace, deadly to aquatic and avian life, harmful to human life, creating environmental and economic crises.

    But misinformation about red tide abounds on social media and elsewhere in the digisphere.

    So it’s important for islanders to know where to turn to learn about the quality of our waters and the health of our beaches.

    And, if you want to be an islander who does good, you can share knowledge and resources with vacationers and confused would-be visitors inquiring on that blasted Facebook about crimson waves washing over their island paradise.

    The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission maintains the go-to resource page for red tide at myfwc.com/research/redtide. There, people can find links to a map indicating K. brevis concentrations, weekly reports, forecasts and a fish kill database.

    The fish kill database — useful to anyone heading out with a tackle box or wondering what’s floating in the canal — can be searched by county, date and “probable cause.”

    From the phone, people can call 866-300-9399 and get an FWC red tide status report. For months, the status has been: “A patchy bloom of the red tide organism Karenia brevis persists …”

    For those wondering if a scratchy throat is red-tide related, a useful resource is visitbeaches.org, maintained by Mote Marine Laboratory in Sarasota, to provide beach conditions for many Florida destinations.

    According to visitbeaches.org, the following conditions were observed Aug. 10 at Manatee Public Beach in Holmes Beach: calm surf, no crowds, no drift algae, slight respiratory irritation and “many” dead fish.

    The same day at Coquina Beach in Bradenton Beach, there were crowds, “some” dead fish and slight respiratory irritation.

    The federal National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration also offers a variety of tools for monitoring red tide, including a new Red Tide Respiratory Forecast that provides a near real-time prediction of whether beachgoers can expect red tide conditions on individual beaches at three-hour increments throughout the day.

    Call up the forecast map at habforecast.gcoos.org to see information for the Rod & Reel Pier in Anna Maria, as well as Cortez Beach and the Coquina Beach boat ramps in Bradenton Beach.

    The risk for respiratory irritation for 5 p.m. Aug. 12? Forecasted as “moderate” at all three locations, but there would be days and times when the forecast would differ depending on the island location.

    “Red tide impacts can be really variable because of wind patterns,” said Dr. Barbara Kirkpatrick, an environmental health scientist who conducted the first studies documenting the impacts of Florida red tide blooms on human health.

    Kirkpatrick added, “There are very few days when all beaches will be affected by red tide and often your favorite beach is only affected for part of the day.”

    So the respiratory forecast lets people see which beaches might be impacted by red tide and at what time of the day, allowing them to plan beach walks and other outdoor activities.

    So use this tool and others to inform and guide.

    As for facts about red tide, I’m partial to university webpages, including the University of Florida’s hot topics page at ifas.ufl.edu, which explains:

    • Red tides are caused by a massive growth of tiny, microscopic algae.
    • In Florida, microscopic algae named Karenia brevis often cause red tides.
    • Karenia brevis is always present in the waters, usually in small numbers, and forms red tides when conditions are just right for growth.
    • Red tides often begin in late summer or early fall and can last for days to months.
    • Red tides move and change shape with tides, currents and winds.
    • Karenia brevis is a fragile algae, and in rough conditions like surf, it will break into small pieces and release noxious particles and chemicals into the air in wind-blown aerosols.
    • Karenia brevis produces chemicals called brevetoxins, which act on the nervous system. Brevetoxins can cause large fish kills by paralyzing fish and preventing them from breathing. And brevetoxins in wind-blown aerosols can affect breathing in people and their pets.
  • Lovey-dovey day

    Lovey-dovey day

    Birds do it.

    Birds fall in love, so goes the popular song by Cole Porter and so says the poem by Geoffrey Chaucer that preceded “Let’s Do It (Let’s Fall in Love)” by about 550 years.

    Chaucer wrote “Parlement of Foules” — “Parliament of Fowls” — in 1382 to honor the anniversary of King Richard II of England and Anne of Bohemia.

    An excerpt from the poem of 699 lines:

    For this was on Saint Valentine’s Day

           When every bird comes there to choose his match

           (Of every kind that men may think of!),

           And that so huge a noise they began to make

           That earth and air and tree and every lake

           Was so full, that not easily was there space

           For me to stand — so full was all the place.

    The poem is the first record associating Valentine’s Day with romantic love and it takes inspiration from amorous birds.

    There’s an old belief — based on the ancient practice of ornithomancy — that the first bird a single person sees or hears on Valentine’s Day represents a soul mate, symbolizes a life partner.

    The practice also has led to the beliefs that goldfinches represent wealth, blackbirds symbolize kindness and nuthatches epitomize knowledge.

    So pay attention to the birds you see Feb. 14.

    That day, you might even consider joining the 24th annual Great Backyard Bird Count.

    “Birds are everywhere and can be counted in backyards, neighborhoods, suburban parks, wild areas and cities,” says David Bonter, co-director of the Center for Engagement in Science and Nature at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology in Ithaca, New York. “Scientists need the eyes of the world to collect information about where the birds are.”

    The count, coordinated by the Cornell Lab, National Audubon Society and Birds Canada, occurs Feb. 12-15, with people around the world counting the birds they see for at least 15 minutes on one or more days and entering their checklists using either the Merlin Bird ID app or the eBird online platform.

    The data gathered in the GBBC and other survey projects can reveal changes in the numbers and distribution of wild birds over time.

    In last year’s count, birdwatchers set records:

    • 268,674 estimated participants in 194 countries;
    • 27,270,156 birds counted;
    • 6,942 species identified;

    “Why not try something new? If you’re an experienced birder, set yourself a challenge to see how many new birders you can get interested in counting on their own patch,” says Steven Price of Birds Canada. “If you are just beginning to learn about the birds in your yard, see if you can identify three new birds — or five new birds or 10 new birds.”

    Who knows? Maybe you’ll see a lovebird — or a goldfinch, depending on your heart’s desire.

    Staying safe

    Great Backyard Bird Count organizers ask that participants watch birds safely in light of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. This means following public health and safety protocols, avoiding large gatherings, wearing face masks and staying at least 6 feet from people outside your household.

    To learn more about how to take part in the count, go online to birdcount.org.

  • Beachbound mothers

    Beachbound mothers

    Helicopter parent?

    Not my mom.

    Free-range parent?

    Not my mom either.

    I grew up with a lot of nurture and also abundant freedom to better my nature. So maybe you could say I grew more like a whale calf than a loggerhead hatchling.

    Loggerheads are totally free-range. They mate. The male swims. The female nests and the hatchlings emerge from the nest to fend for themselves and, if triumphant, repeat the cycle.

    This concept in Mother Nature, alien to my experience, fascinates me.

    As a kid playing with my siblings, I acted out adventures of fending for ourselves in a forest, on a river, or atop a mountain, but we only went so far before the dinner call sounded and brought us back home.

    Now I imagine the lives of loggerhead sea turtles, the nesting female and the emerging hatchling.

    The loggerhead may be the most abundant sea turtle species in the United States but the species, depending on the region, is threatened and protected.

    Threats include incidental capture in longline fishing, shrimp trawling, pollution, predation of nests and human disturbances such as coastal lighting and housing development.  Another major threat is the loss of nesting habitat due to coastal development, which makes safeguarding our shoreline vital.

    On Anna Maria Island, the nesting activity seems so abundant that it might be easy to overlook the fact that there are only 40,000-50,000 nesting females in the world, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, which lists loggerheads as “vulnerable,” facing a high risk of extinction in the wild in the near future.

    The turtles feed primarily on shellfish, and the females nest every two to four years.

    A nest, typically dug in the sand between the dune front and high tide line, contains an average 100-126 eggs that incubate for about 60 days.

    When hatchlings emerge from nests, usually at night, they scramble across the sand, avoiding predators, to reach the water and swim for their survival.

    The mama turtle’s “parenting” is done when the nest gets covered with sand.

    But to protect the survival of the species, the loggerhead lays numerous clutches of eggs in locations miles apart.

    A recent University of South Florida study, published in the journal Scientific Reports, found that some female loggerheads lay as many as six clutches as far as 6 miles apart during the same breeding season.

    “Nesting females don’t lay all their eggs in one basket,” USF-St. Petersburg professor Deby Cassill said. She’s the author of the study. “Their reproductive strategy is like investing in a mutual fund. Females divide their resources among many stocks rather than investing in a single stock.”

    In a lifetime, one mama loggerhead might produce 4,200 eggs and place them at 40 sites on a single barrier island, according to Cassill’s research based on 17 years of data from the Conservancy of Southwest Florida.

    The strategy reduces the risk of reproductive failure due to storms that could wash out clutches and improves the hatchling survival rate.

    Free-range parenting?

    Totally.

    Maternal instinct?

    Yep.

  • The ostrich paradox

    The ostrich paradox

    “We’re surrounded by water.”

    A former public works boss on Anna Maria Island would offer the remark, responding to inquiries about flooded roads, parking lots and buildings.

    Without question, the island is surrounded by water, but we can plan and adjust to be more resilient and need to create a stronger community to deal with rising seas.

    We can’t ignore the physical and economic risks of wind, water and extreme weather.

    We can’t bury our heads in the sand.

    We should be like the ostrich, which, contrary to myth, doesn’t bury its head in the sand but has adapted to compensate for its inability to fly.

    The ostrich deals with risk.

    There’s a book titled “The Ostrich Paradox” — it’s not on everyone’s bedside table, I’m sure.

    Authors Robert Meyer and Howard Kunreuther — both of the Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania — write about “why we underprepare for disasters.”

    They list six reasons:

    • Myopia, focusing on short horizons;
    • Amnesia, quickly forgetting lessons of past disasters;
    • Optimism, underestimating the likelihood of losses;
    • Inertia, tending to maintain the status quo due to uncertainties;
    • Simplification, selectively focusing on only part of an issue;
    • And herding, basing choices on the actions of others.

    The book is a must-read for policymakers, emergency management professionals, risk managers and “anyone who wants to understand why we consistently underprepare for disasters,” according to Jay Neal, president and CEO of the Federal Association for Insurance Reform.

    FAIR is focused on reducing uninsured risk and promoting wind and flood mitigation and, last fall, hosted a program on “The Ostrich Paradox.”

    More recently, on Feb. 24, the foundation hosted a virtual, Zoom-based town hall on the relationship between extreme weather and rising property insurance costs.

    Panelists included Neal, meteorologist John Morales, insurance expert Fred Karlinsky and former FEMA administrator Craig Fugate, who reminded attendees that “Florida is the sore thumb that sticks out in hurricane alley.”

    Morales spoke about more days with intense heat and stronger storms delivering more intense winds and more water, as well as nuisance events, such as sunny day floods caused by high tides.

    How prepared are we? he asked.

    The consensus was not prepared enough, as the panelists shared their goals of promoting resiliency through mitigation, improving disaster preparedness and addressing a multitude of concerns: underinsurance, premium costs, the debt-burdened government flood insurance program.

    New research from the First Street Foundation quantifies the financial impacts of flood risk carried by U.S. homeowners and how those impacts are growing as flood risks worsen due to a rapidly changing climate.

    The foundation found that there are nearly 4.3 million residential homes with substantial flood risk that would result in financial loss.

    Furthermore, the research demonstrates that if all of the homes were to be insured against flood risk through the National Flood Insurance Program, rates would need to increase 4.5 times to cover the risk today.

    The new research comes as FEMA is working on the “Risk Rating 2.0” initiative, which would set new premiums for properties inside and outside of Special Flood Hazard Areas based on their individual flood risk.

    Politicians, planners and property owners face challenges now: escalating insurance rates, keeping the flood program solvent and revising zoning and building codes, infrastructure plans and management to minimize new risk and correct existing ones.

    The town hall panelists warned of a perfect storm but, in this case, cautioned against ducking down and burying heads in the sand.

    Do as the ostrich does?

  • Big find, big concern

    Big find, big concern

    Scientists identified a new whale species in the Gulf of Mexico.

    The animal now known as Rice’s whale was formerly known as the Bryde’s whale.

    The name change doesn’t change the species status — the whale remains endangered.

    News of the new species broke this winter, with publication of an article in the Marina Mammal Science journal and circulation of news releases and press statements from key players, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    The lead author of the article titled “A new species of baleen whale from the Gulf of Mexico, with a review of its geographic distribution” works for NOAA.

    Fisheries scientist Patricia Rosel started the journey toward identifying Rice’s whale in collaboration with NOAA scientists Keith Mullin and Lynsey Wilcox.

    Mullin had been studying Gulf whales since the 1990s and believed they were rare and needed protection.

    Rosel and Wilcox were examining genetic data obtained from whale samples collected on a NOAA vessel in the Gulf from 2008, when they recognized genetic material that looked different from that of other whales.

    Further, Rosel identified diagnostic characteristics that distinguished the Gulf whale she was interested in from other closely related baleen whale species.

    Integral to identifying the new species was the examination of a whale skull in 2020.

    The skull came from a whale that had stranded in Florida off Everglades National Park in 2019.

    The dead animal was examined, then buried at Fort DeSoto Park in Pinellas County and then exhumed for more research, including body measurements of the whale to compare with those from other strandings.

    “The morphological differences, when combined with the genetic data Rosel and Wilcox had collected, were enough to distinguish this as a new species of baleen whale,” according to NOAA, whose partners in the lengthy research effort include Sarasota-based Mote Marine Laboratory, Everglades National Park Service, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and others.

    The Rice’s whale is considered one of the rarest in the world and only about 50-100 exist in the Gulf, their primary habitat being offshore of the Florida coast.

    The species faces multiple threats — vessel strikes, entanglement in fishing gear, proposed aquaculture activities, exploration for oil and gas and pollution — and extinction is not out of the question.

    What killed the whale stranded at the Everglades park and exhumed from Fort DeSoto?

    A necropsy revealed a 3-inch hunk of plastic lodged in its gut that may have contributed to its demise.

    A sad end for the hero of this whale tale.

    About Rice’s whale

    Rice’s whales can weigh up to 60,000 pounds, which is about five times as heavy as an elephant.

    The whales can grow up to 42 feet long.

    Not much is known about their life expectancy, but closely related species reach sexual maturity at 9-years-old and can live about 60 years.

    The biggest threats to the species include vessel strikes, ocean noise, energy exploration, development and production, oil spills and responses, entanglement in fishing gear and ocean debris.

    The new name honors biologist David Rice, the first researcher to recognize that Bryde’s whales exist in the Gulf of Mexico.

    The Latin name for Rice’s whale is Balaenoptera ricei.

    For now, the whale remains protected as the “Gulf of Mexico Bryde’s whale” under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act.

    NOAA will need to follow a regulatory process to update the name in the listing once the “Rice’s whale” is accepted by the Society for Marine Mammalogy Committee on Taxonomy.

  • Peace and contemplation

    Peace and contemplation

    “We remember.”

    Across the country, religious groups and community organizations, artists and activists, neighbors remembering neighbors, families mourning family are creating COVID-19 memorials.

    Some memorials display wooden crosses, some contain paper butterflies, others incorporate videos and photographs.

    White flags surround a church in Greenwich, Connecticut.

    American flags fill a lawn in Grafton, Massachusetts.

    Green ribbons line a fence outside a home in Vancouver, Washington.

    And in Anna Maria Feb. 16, colorful ribbons tied to a cord were stretched along the beach near the Sandbar Restaurant. The ribbons numbered more than 29,000 and represented the number of Floridians who’ve died of COVID-19 in the past year.

    At about 11 a.m. that day, islanders and others gathered — in masks and socially distanced — to raise the ribbon of ribbons and reflect on the lives lost and the push through the coronavirus pandemic. Many of them wore buttons with “We Remember.”

    Wind whistled in the microphone, sometimes drowning out the words from memorial creator Cathy Tobias and others.

    But the raising of the COVID-19 Memorial in Anna Maria was not about words.

    Waves crashed at the shore.

    Sunlight pushed through clouds.

    We faced the Gulf, lifted our arms and looked skyward — not to follow the drone documenting the moment but to stand on the shore for 10 minutes and find solace, peace and even joy.

    On a ribbon, with a black marker, I wrote “Jane J,” for a friend of the family who died late last year of COVID-19.

    “We remember.”

    I realized, as I let go of my section of ribbons, how often I go to the beach and turn to the Gulf to find solace, peace and joy.

    Studies and science help to document the power of nature for mental and physical healing, especially during a crisis, and we’re in the midst of a crisis.

    Have you heard of a “sense of coherence” score?

    SOC comprises the triad of meaningfulness — finding a sense of meaning, recognizing and understanding stress and feeling equipped to cope.

    A new study published in Public Health in Practice shows that regularly taking a walk in nature can lead to a higher sense of coherence.

    Another study, published in November 2020 in the journal Ecological Applications, focuses on green spaces and suggests that nature near one’s home can help mitigate some of the negative mental health effects of the pandemic.

    A survey of 3,000 adults in Tokyo quantified the link between five mental-health outcomes — depression, life satisfaction, subjective happiness, self-esteem and loneliness — and two measures of nature experiences — and the frequency of greenspace use and green views through windows.

    More frequent visits in nature and the existence of “green” window views from the home were associated with increased levels of self-esteem, life satisfaction and subjective happiness, as well as decreased levels of depression and loneliness.

    Other new studies confirm that during the coronavirus crisis, more people have ventured into nature and experienced the outdoors.

    For one project, University of Vermont researchers surveyed visitors to 25 parks and natural areas.

    As public health protocols — including social distancing and travel restrictions — were introduced, nearly 70% of park users increased their visits to local nature.

    About 81% said these areas held increased importance for them.

    The most common reasons for visiting natural areas? Getting outside, exercising, connecting to nature, and finding peace and quiet.

    Researchers found that 66% of people used natural areas to find peace and quiet, and 32% as spaces for contemplation.

    Back to the beach.

  • Sunny, hot and still keep your distance

    Sunny, hot and still keep your distance

    Chipped beef on toast served with a side of Tater Tots, black coffee and tomato juice.

    I placed that breakfast order at a local cafe March 15, 2020. How can I remember the date for such a breakfast? Because that meal with my wife and parents was the last time I dined inside a restaurant.

    Later that Sunday, I attended a neighbor’s open house. We abstained from hugs but I remember being more concerned about the comingling of vegan and nonvegan potluck offerings on the table than germs.

    Since that afternoon, I haven’t been inside another person’s home for longer than 10 minutes and always wearing a face mask.

    There was so much we didn’t know or comprehend a year ago, in the days before we could recite the definitions for coronavirus, pandemic, vaccine efficacy, herd immunity and variants.

    The last time I shopped inside a supermarket — March 27, 2020 — I remember turning away from people crowded in the freezer aisle and holding my breath in the checkout lane.

    In a mid-march 2020 column headlined “Sunny, hot and keep your distance,” I naively wrote: “I’ll probably continue to avoid crowds — given the cancellations taking place, I might not have a choice.”

    I also optimistically wrote, “On the sunny side, there’s no reason to avoid long walks in the neighborhood, hikes in our nature preserves and late afternoons on the beach, where I can catch the Gulf breeze and soak up the sun’s rays to boost my melatonin and Vitamin D.

    “Blue skies and sunny days lie ahead.”

    The past year brought such loss and hardship, but through it all, there were many blue skies and sunny days.

    So I ramped up my strolls around the block to mile-long walks around the neighborhood five times a day.

    I bought a kite to fly from the Palma Sola Causeway.

    I played croquet — a perfect game for social distancing — with my parents in the park near their condo in Madeira Beach.

    I masked up as needed to hike through Perico, Neal and Robinson preserves and went birdwatching at the Audubon Society’s sanctuaries.

    I walked on Gulf beaches and on the boards of bayside piers.

    Gardening in the area outside my kitchen window occupied time and several nurseries became Saturday morning destinations.

    Bicycling became even more exhilarating — a way to go, go, go without concern for crowds or invasions of my space.

    I took occasional drives for Florida daytrips — to picnic by the Atlantic Ocean in Eatonville and read a book in the shade at Bok Tower Gardens in Lake Wales.

    Some days were spent strolling around St. Petersburg and Tampa, looking at murals, learning new neighborhoods and lunching outside a food truck.

    The new St. Petersburg Pier, until the heady tourist season arrived, became an outdoor oasis.

    Getting into the great outdoors didn’t always prove a great time or guarantee safety, particularly at events where promoters made promises they didn’t or couldn’t keep in terms of pandemic precautions.

    Still, there were many blue skies, sunny days and good times.

    Here’s to many more.

  • Treemendous trees

    Treemendous trees

    My family tree?

    A crabapple, which blossomed with bright purplish flowers and blanketed the backyard with tiny, wormy fruit.

    The tree stood at my childhood home when we moved into the house in 1971 and remained standing until 1982, the year I graduated high school.

    A blight of some kind forced my parents to take down the tree, but for more than a decade, the crabapple provided work and recreation and sparked my imagination.

    Saturday mornings, I joined my siblings in the backyard to pick up spoiled fruit — we competed to see who could chuck a crabapple in the garbage can from the greatest distance and occasionally flung crabapples at one another — a warm-weather substitution of a snowball fight.

    We climbed the trunk and hung from branches until one brother fell and broke an arm.

    At my youngest, I played at being Johnny Appleseed and planted the crabapples to grow more trees around the neighborhood.

    I learned about Johnny “Appleseed” Chapman, the nomadic orchardist of the 1800s, from a Walt Disney cartoon series that also told the tall tales of Pecos Bill and Paul Bunyan and, more recently, John Henry.

    The children’s tale is that Johnny Appleseed randomly spread seeds everywhere he traveled, but the reality is that he established nurseries from Pennsylvania to Illinois.

    I hadn’t thought of Johnny Appleseed in years, but he came to mind when I contemplated how I wanted to celebrate National Arbor Day, which is Friday, April 30.

    The Arbor Day Foundation encourages us to attend a planting celebration or plant a tree on the holiday observed the last Friday in April.

    Arbor Day’s origins is on the Great Plains — in Nebraska — where, in April 1872, a man named J. Sterling Morton called for setting aside a day for planting and calling attention to trees.

    Nebraskans are said to have planted a million trees on the first Arbor Day.

    Later, in Lisle, Illinois, Morton’s daughter Joy founded the Morton Arboretum, a destination for many students in the Chicago suburbs, including myself decades ago.

    Children learn about oaks and acorns, how to plant seedlings and make tree jokes —What’s a tree’s worst month? Sep-timber.

    Kids also learn about the value of trees using a tree benefit calculator.

    The live oak outside my home, with a trunk measuring about 22 inches in circumference, provides overall benefits of about $231 a year, including:

    • Intercepting about 12,281 gallons of stormwater runoff;
    • Raising the property value by $163 a year;
    • Conserving 141 kilowatt hours of electricity for cooling;
    • Absorbing pollutants like ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide through leaves;
    • Intercepting particulate matter like dust, ash and smoke;
    • Releasing oxygen through photosynthesis
    • Reducing atmospheric carbon by 1,240 pounds.

    As for my family tree, if the crabapple still stood, the annual estimated value would be about $165.

    But I’d put the estimated value much higher.

    Happy Arbor Day!

  • Vroom, vroom

    Vroom, vroom

    Vroom, vroom

    Shhh, don’t tell Speedy.

    Speedy is my sparkling blue 2011 Ford Fiesta that I determined years ago I’d drive forever.

    Yet another car has caught my eye, or rather, another type of car has caught my eye.

    I’m proud to say Speedy is no gas-guzzler, as she gets about 37-40 miles to the gallon.

    Still, she’s powered by gasoline and lately I’ve taken to noticing the electric vehicles cruising along on Manatee Avenue and Gulf Drive.

    I’m also reading financial forecasts that say electric cars could be less expensive than gasoline-powered cars as soon as 2025 and trends reports that all gas-powered cars could be antiques in 20 years.

    UBS investment bank, for example, is predicting the end of the internal combustion engine age, saying new cars would be 20% electric in 2025, 50% in 2030 and 100% in 2040.

    Back in 2011, before acquiring Speedy, my wife and I considered the environmental benefits of electric vehicles.

    Cost was a concern, but we also wondered about access to charging ports on the island.

    At the time, I was aware of only one AMI site — at the Historic Green Village on Pine Avenue, which also was ahead of the eco-curve with solar water heaters, solar panels and recycled rainwater.

    I can’t say EV charging ports are abundant on the island since the last decade ago, when I worried about running out of juice and getting stranded. However, there are at least a few more ports, particularly in Bradenton Beach.

    And we’re likely to see more as a result of consumer demand, government incentives and commitments from the auto and energy sectors.

    Earlier this spring, the Holmes Beach City Commission agreed to an arrangement with Florida Power and Light to host an EV charging station at city hall, 5801 Marina Drive.

    FPL representative Ashley Fogg Shutz told The Islander the new station would include four charging ports.

    “Anna Maria Island is an area we are looking at closely,” she also said. “But at this time, do not have any upcoming locations to share.”

    FPL launched its EVolution pilot program in 2019 with a goal of installing more than 1,000 charging ports at 100 locations statewide, increasing the availability of ports in Florida by 50%.

    The EVolution chargers work with most automobiles, including Teslas with an adapter, but are not compatible with golf carts.

    And use is free for EV drivers to power up at a station.

    So should Speedy need a sibling — or seek retirement — I might be looking for something sparkly blue that gets 250 miles per charge.

  • Sustenance in a storm

    Sustenance in a storm

    This month, you’ll read and hear a lot about hurricane readiness.

    Be prepared with enough supplies to last seven days.

    Be prepared to evacuate.

    Be prepared to shelter with a hotelier, family, friends, with a hot tub.

    Be prepared to weather the peculiarities of those with whom you may be confined.

    Be prepared to drink water without ice.

    And be prepared to eat Spam?

    I looked up “Spam” in the dictionary and chuckled to see the first listing for a noun defines spam as “unwanted or intrusive advertising on the internet.”

    The second listing: A trademarked brand of canned meat product made mainly from ham.

    The dictionary’s example of Spam in a sentence reads, “Sammy Leslie and Ultan Bannon know that wine lovers want good wines first and good trimmings after, so there are no stray tins of Spam here.”

    I got my first taste of Spam at a surfer-inspired restaurant on Gulf Drive in Anna Maria, located where Harry’s Grill now operates. They served an island-style Spam fried rice, and I think the island influence was Hawaiian rather than AMI.

    I thought the dish tasty and added Spam, a product with a long shelf life, to my hurricane kit.

    Don’t mock the stockpile.

    Even before the coronavirus pandemic hit and hoarders packed the grocery aisles despite early cautions about social distancing, Spam sales were setting annual records.

    Why?

    Affordability, stability and also versatility. Did you know that you can use the lid from the can to warm Spam over a fire?

    So Spam remains a staple in my readiness kit, which should contain enough nonperishable food to sustain a household for a week.

    My kit also includes jarred olives, bread-and-butter pickles, raspberry jam, creamy peanut butter, Pop-Tarts, crackers, Swedish fish, coffee and soda pop.

    Meanwhile, wife Connie’s additions include canned pears and peaches, jarred kale, beans, teas and freeze-dried cherries, green beans, carrots and celery.

    Someone might guess I’m packing for summer camp and she’s preparing for “Survivor.”

    The Islander asked readers via social media what they keep in their kits to sustain them through and after.

    Some replies:

    • “We keep dehydrated food on hand that will still be usable long after we’re dead … and liquor.”
    • “Duct tape. And beer.”
    • “Trail mix is a must.”
    • “Pudding, please.”
    • “Steak sauce so you can pretend.”

    One more: “Not Spam, that’s for sure!”

    But whether Spam or jam goes in the kit, be prepared.

  • About bathers, boats, birds and bombs

    About bathers, boats, birds and bombs

           Cause for concern among conservationists across the country is the federal government’s move to diminish regulations and policies protecting wild lands and waters in its trust.

           But one of the nation’s first wildlife refuges, a small meandering key about a mile from the north end of Anna Maria Island, likely will remain safeguarded from new intrusions.

           That’s because during World War II training exercises decades ago, the federal government bombed the area and a low risk remains for people encountering munitions.

           In 1905, President Theodore Roosevelt established the 64-acre mangrove island that held a freshwater lake as one of the nation’s first wildlife refuges, seeking to protect nesting colonies of birds. The land is owned by the Interior Department and managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

           Passage Key’s size has fluctuated in the years since. The lake is gone and, at times, the entire key has been underwater, but more than 50 species of birds — including pelicans, oystercatchers, skimmers, terns and gulls — nest on the spit of sand, which is closed year-round to the public.

           Boaters too flock to anchor off Passage Key, and though federal law forbids it, occasionally they can be found on its beach tossing Frisbees, collecting shells, walking dogs or sunbathing.

           Also lurking and hidden at and around Passage Key — old munitions.

           Yes, local maps show Passage Key National Wildlife Refuge with the Passage Key Wilderness Area, but a map from the Army Corps of Engineers identifies the area as a “Formerly Used Defense Site” known as the Passage Key Air-to-Ground Gunnery Range.

           During WWII, Sarasota Army Airfield crews used Passage Key for a strafing and skip bombing range. Crews trained with machine guns, practice bombs and possibly live bombs at two banks of six targets that are now underwater.

           Some island histories contain details of the military training and recollections of island adults who said that as kids, they boated to Passage Key to collect shell casings.

           In 1998, after a bomb was found on the island and three more were found in the surrounding waters, the Corps launched a study and investigation of the area that involved historical research and some on-site work using metal detectors.

           The lengthy Corps’ review divided the study area into two sites — the 649-acre air-to-ground target site at Passage Key and the remaining 12,498-acre waters fanning out from Passage Key.

           Investigators found expended ammunition and pieces of munitions. In the water, they found two bomb fuzes, a rocket and a 37-millimeter projectile, according to Corps documents released from the study.

           The investigation concluded that there’s “no unacceptable risk in remaining waters,” resulting in a decision by the government to take no action in that area.

           For the target site, the investigation concluded a “low potential risk from people encountering munitions,” and the federal government decided the best course is “land-use controls,” which involves posting warning signs at public boat ramps and other locations, possibly Bayfront Park in Anna Maria.

           The controls also provide some guarantee that Passage Key will remain what it has been for decades — a shifting mound of sand at the entrance to Tampa Bay reserved for the birds.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper.

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Teach them well

    Teach them well

           A few weeks after the first Earth Day observance occurred April 22, 1970, Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young released the album “Déjà Vu,” which contained the folk rock single, “Teach Your Children.”

           The song for the times became an anthem for many movements — for peace, for justice, for equality and for the environment.

           We were taught well back then.

           We walked to school and church, to the candy store, playground and neighborhood grocery. We carpooled to baseball games and orchestra rehearsals. We rode the public bus to the mall. We recycled old coffee cans into drums and crafted slingshots from tree branches. We bought day-old treats from the bakery. We carried groceries in paper bags and lunches in lunch boxes. We used jelly jars for drinking glasses. We wore hand-me-downs. We made shoulder bags from worn-out jeans and pocket purses from worn-out shoulder bags.

           We were cool little conservationists.

           So why do we live in a throwaway society? Forty-nine years after the first Earth Day, why do we want and waste rather than waste not and want not?

           Take up a position near a fast-food counter and count how many people take, crumple and discard a paper receipt before leaving the restaurant — sometimes even before leaving the counter.

           Stand outside a grocery store and count the number of people who leave with single-use shopping bags — yes, the kind that cannot go into home recycle bins. The other day, I saw a family leave the Publix Super Market in Holmes Beach, pushing two carts piled high with groceries in single-use bags. Even their milk cartons were bagged.

           I’m halfway through a small book, “You Can Save The Earth: A Handbook for Environmental Awareness, Conservation and Sustainability,” that contains inspirational quotes and exercises intended to teach us to be better environmentalists, better people.

           The quotation introducing the first chapter is from William Butler Yeats: “All that we did, all that we said or sang must come from contact with the soil.”

           The exercise for the chapter on interconnectedness instructs the reader to find a quiet place, close her eyes and feel connected to all living things by repeating: “I am connected to life and to our Earth.”

           I read on, seeking inspiration.

           I worked through the exercises.

           I repeated the affirmations: “I love my life, I love my Earth.” “When I choose something Earth-friendly, I choose something good for me and my loved ones.” “I am committed to doing my part to conserve limited energy resources.”

           But I kept going back to the family that took home as many as 40 plastic shopping bags from one whirl through the super market.

           Are exercises and affirmations enough to move them to change their ways?

           I found myself discussing the question with one of my grade-school-aged nieces. She thought a shaming would work better than an affirmation. “They should have to wear the bags on their heads,” she suggested.

           I tested her idea.

           It is embarrassing and shaming to wear a plastic bag over one’s head.

           But it also is dangerous, and for that reason, I can’t endorse.

           But this concept of shaming those who can’t seem to share our dreams? Well, that’s one way to teach our parents well.

    Did you know?

           An estimated 5 trillion plastic bags are used every year, according to the Ocean Conservancy, an environmental group. 

           About 160,000 plastic bags are used each second of the year.

           Less than 1% of single-use plastic bags are recycled.

           Most single-use plastic bags are made from polyethylene and take centuries to degrade.

           About 10% of plastic bags end up in the world’s oceans.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Daily dose of nature

    Daily dose of nature

           I keep an early schedule, rising before the sun and sometimes falling to sleep before the sun sets.

           So my day often begins and ends watching the sky change from dark to bright and bright to dark, and listening to birds sing to the start and finality of the day.

           I’m not paying more attention these days, but I’m hearing and seeing “outdoors” in new ways, hoping experiences with nature will relieve the anxiety of a stressful time.

           I’m not alone.

           One morning after the governor ordered beach gatherings limited to 10 people and before local governments ordered our beaches closed, I took a walk on the multi-use path at Coquina Beach.

           Warblers filled the Australian pine trees that arch overhead and their song entertained as well as anything you’ll hear with earbuds.

           I stopped to try to locate the birds and got dizzy looking into the sunlight radiating through gaps in tree branches. I spotted mockingbirds, blue jays, a gray catbird, common grackle, and palm, prairie, pine and hooded warblers.

           Other people walked and biked the path that morning, most practicing social distancing. I talked from afar with a few who recognized that nature has a role in the health of mind and body, as does exercise.

           Even those staying home — self-isolating or quarantined to prevent the spread of COVID-19 — can fill a natureRx by throwing open a window, propping a door or going to the lanai for a wildlife serenade.

           Working from my back porch, I can watch squirrel gymnastics in the live oak trees, count butterflies and, honestly, see pollen cascading before my eyes.

           The yellow flowers of clustered purslane open with intensifying sunlight and the chiseling by downy woodpeckers quiets at noon.

           Out front, rabbits munch on tender spring grass and occasionally hop into a bed of overgrown ferns, blue jays imitate osprey and the doves coo at everyone and everything.

           And when outdoors or open air can’t be experienced, I can spy online — via bird cams — nesting eagles, osprey and owls, feeding cardinals, grosbeaks and hummingbirds.

           The Cornell Lab of Ornithology’s AllAboutBirds.org is one of the most reliable sites for bird cams. The site launched about eight years ago and since, tens of millions of viewers have visited to see red-tailed hawks, barred owls, Bermuda petrels, albatross, ospreys, herons, blackbirds and woodpeckers in live-action.

           Wonder what happens when a pileated joins the breakfast “feeder”?

           We can keep our social distance and stay home, and yet, still get close to nature.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • You say tomato?

    I once savored a $120 tomato.

    I was eating lunch in my kitchen, not dining at a restaurant with Michelin stars.

    I calculated the $120 cost based on the yield from an effort to grow a container vegetable garden in Anna Maria. One tomato was salvaged before the nematodes invaded the yard and destroyed an already pitiful crop.

    I knew the parasitic pests were coming. A neighbor seemed to get his morning pleasure from looking over the wooden fence between yards at the crops and cautioning, “Look out for the nematodes?” “The nematodes will get you if you don’t watch out.”

    After that failed effort to grow a vegetable garden, I sought out farmers’ markets for produce until the coronavirus pandemic struck.

    Recently, I returned to a market known for safe practices and found plenty of produce to enjoy.

    I also found other shoppers complaining about a lack of variety. They said they wanted locally grown, freshly harvested produce, but asked for berries, the kind typically grown in Michigan in midsummer, and pears, the kind grown in the winter but in Argentina.

    If the mantra is “eat local, eat the seasons,” we’ve got to appreciate what can be grown in Florida’s hot, rainy summer or the cooler, drier winter.

    The Florida Department of Agriculture conducts a “Fresh from Florida” program, providing a seasonal availability calendar and “What’s in Season Now?” charts at fdacs.gov and on social media at #FreshFromFlorida.

    In January, expect to find locally grown avocados, bell peppers, broccoli, cabbage, carambola, cauliflower, celery, eggplant, grapefruit, guava, lettuce, mushrooms, oranges, passion fruit, peanuts, radishes, snap beans, squash, strawberries, sweet corn, tangerines and tomatoes.

    Expect to find locally grown mango, watermelon, cantaloupe and mushrooms but not tomatoes in July, which is when I tried to grow a crop.

    Back then, I was a year removed from the Midwest and made the error of assuming tomatoes grow everywhere in the summertime.

    I’d held notions about the Sunshine State and forgotten a hard-luck lesson from Sunshine State literature. Recall this passage in Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings’ “Cross Creek”: “I went then, the porch well cleaned, wet and glistening in the fading light, to water my garden. There were a few carrots that I had hoped to bring through the heat, a few zinnias, half a dozen desperate collard plants, poor things but mine own.”

    I’ve learned a lot in the 15-plus years since my garden yielded a tomato and I gave away my EarthBoxes.

    I’ve read about planning, soil preparation, composting, fertilizing, irrigating and managing pests.

    I’ve studied the hardiness zones and grow charts and started a journal, with notes about when to plant beets and when to harvest collards.

    So I’m ready to try again, whether at a community garden such as the one the city of Holmes Beach plans to establish near Grassy Point Preserve or in a patio greenhouse.

    I’ll heed the caution of my old neighbor, “The nematodes will get you if you don’t watch out.”

    And I’ll be satisfied with growing “mine own.”

  • Ride on: Public transportation use reaches 57-year high, but not in Wisconsin

    Ride on: Public transportation use reaches 57-year high, but not in Wisconsin

    Americans took 10.7 billion trips on public transportation in 2013, which is the highest annual public transit ridership number in 57 years.

    “Americans in growing numbers want to have more public transit services in their communities,” said American Public Transit Association board chair Peter Varga, who also is the CEO of The Rapid transit system in Grand Rapids, Mich. “Public transportation systems nationwide — in small, medium and large communities — saw ridership increases. Some reported all-time high ridership numbers.”

    But the trend didn’t carry over to Wisconsin: Madison’s system reported a slight bump in bus use, an increase of 1.02 percent, but Port Washington reported a decrease of 2.78 percent. Milwaukee reported a decrease of 2.36 percent and Racine’s system reported a 3.7 percent drop in bus ridership, according to APTA.

    The public transit agencies reporting record ridership in 2013 included Ann Arbor, Mich.; Cleveland; Denver; Espanola, N.M.; Flagstaff, Ariz.; Fort Myers, Fla.; Indianapolis; Los Angeles; New Orleans; Oakland, Calif.; Pompano Beach, Fla.; Riverside, Calif.; Salt Lake City; San Carlos, Calif.; Tampa, Yuma, Ariz.; and New York City.

    Ridership was up 37.2 percent since 1995, outpacing population growth, which was up 20.3 percent, and outpacing vehicle miles, which was up 22.7 percent since 1995.

    “There is a fundamental shift going on in the way we move about our communities. People in record numbers are demanding more public transit services and communities are benefiting with strong economic growth,” said APTA president and CEO Michael Melaniphy. “Access to public transportation matters. Community leaders know that public transportation investment drives community growth and economic revitalization.”

    Another reason behind the ridership increases is the economic recovery in certain areas. When more people are employed, public transportation ridership increases — nearly 60 percent of the trips taken on public transportation are for work commutes, according to the APTA.

    In the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’s most recent report, Wisconsin ranked 35th in job creation.

    “The federal investment in public transit is paying off and that is why Congress needs to act this year to pass a new transportation bill,” said Melaniphy.

    The report showed:

    • Bus ridership increased by 3.8 percent in cities with populations below 100,000. Nationally, bus ridership in communities of all sizes remained stable.

    • Large bus systems with increases were reported by Washington, D.C., Houston, Cincinnati and Seattle.

    • Subway and elevated train ridership increased by 2.8 percent across the country as eight out of 15 transit systems reported increases.

    • Commuter rail ridership increased by 2.1 percent across the country, with 20 out of 28 transit systems reporting increases. With a new rail line that opened in December 2012, commuter rail in Salt Lake City saw an increase of 103.3 percent. Meanwhile, double-digit increases were reported in Austin, Texas; Harrisburg-Philadelphia; Anchorage, Alaska; Lewisville, Texas; Stockton, Calif.; Minneapolis, Minn.; and Portland, Ore.

    • For light rail — modern streetcars, trolleys and heritage trolleys — ridership increased 1.6 percent in 2013 with 17 out of 27 transit systems reporting increases.

    Wisconsin lags

    As for public transportation bus trips, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation says there’s been a decline from 76.4 million in 2000 to 65.7 million in 2012.

    Transportation experts cite state funding cuts as a reason for the decline.

    Al Stanek, parking and transit systems manager for Racine, said state cuts led the Belle Urban System to raise its fares but reduce its bus service hours by more than 10 percent in two years. “In the middle of the day, we went to buses running just once an hour,” he said. “It’s about the bare minimum you can provide service. If you missed the bus, now you’d be standing out in the cold for an hour, an hour and a half.”

    Milwaukee County avoided cuts in bus service with a federal grant that runs out this year, said Brendan Conway, spokesman for Milwaukee County Executive Chris Abele. But the county already had been raising fares and cutting services for more than a decade. Buses in the Milwaukee area travel 22 percent fewer miles than they did in 2000.

    Wisconsin also discourages commuters with its lack of rail service and rapid transit, said Rob Henken, president of the Public Policy Forum. Rail services showed the biggest gains in ridership in the APTA report, he noted.

    Republican Gov. Scott Walker killed a high-speed rail project planned under former Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle to connect Madison and Milwaukee.

    To deal with the decline in service, a group of 15 state senators has introduced bills aimed at improving public transportation in the state. The proposals would:

    • Require the DOT to submit a state rail plan every two years.

    • Increase state aid for each class of mass transit systems in the state and restore transit cuts made in 2011.

    • Require the DOT to establish a transit capital assistance program.

    • Increase funding for the specialized transportation assistance program.

    Sponsoring state Sen. Mark Miller, D-Monona, said, “Transit plays such a critical role in the vitality of our communities. The direct benefit to public transit users is enormous. For many Wisconsin residents, their only means of getting to a job, to go to a store or to the polls is by public transit.”

    The AP contributed to this report.

    Join us on Facebook and Twitter.

  • Wisconsin grows initiative to save seeds

    An online store opened in mid-April, in time for vegetable growers to get seeds to plant for a summer or fall harvest. What makes the store unique is that it is an outlet for the Open Source Seed Initiative, a campaign affiliated with UW-Madison and established in 2011 by plant breeders, farmers, sustainable food system advocates, educators and others concerned about the decreasing availability of non-patented seeds.

    Many of the big crop plants — specifically field corn and soybeans — already are restricted through patents, licenses and other forms of intellectual property protection. So are an increasing number of vegetable, fruit and small grain seeds. Those patented seeds cannot be shared, saved or even replanted by growers in the next year.

    The Center for Food Safety, a watchdog and advocacy group, says the No. 1 threat to seed biodiversity is this corporate takeover of seeds.

    Seed development and distribution in the United States, until the last few decades, was largely under the purview of the public sector and augmented by hundreds of small seed-breeder businesses, which acted mainly as distributors of publicly developed seed varieties. Today, the 10 top companies control 65 percent of proprietary seed, according to the CFS.

    And companies aggressively defend their property rights. Monsanto has sued farmers in 27 states and won more than $24 million in 72 judgments from farmers, according to CFS.

    “Many public breeders don’t have the freedom to operate,” said Jack Kloppenburg, the author of First the Seed and a UW-Madison professor involved in the OSSI.

    The initiative distributed its first seed packets — 29 types of organic seeds are available — on April 17. The launch occurred on the International Day of Struggle in Defense of Peasants’ and Farmers’ Seeds, which was marked with a rally on the university campus, followed by a teach-in.

    Participants in the events pledged to work to keep the seeds freely available to anyone who wants them.

    “These vegetables are part of our common cultural heritage and our goal is to make sure these seeds remain in the public domain for people to use in the future,” said professor Irwin Goldman, a plant breeder and UW-Madison horticulture professor involved in the effort.

    Goldman, Kloppenburg and others in the OSSI took a cue from the open source software movement that provided alternatives to proprietary computer software. The seed initiative was created to ensure that the genes in at least some seeds can never be owned, patented and held as intellectual property.

    Goldman has described the OSSI as something like a national park for seeds. The people’s park includes “Full Pint” barley from Oregon State University, “Midnight Lightning” zucchini from High Mowing Organic Seed Co., “Siber-Frill” kale and “Emerald Fan” lettuce from Lupine Knoll Farm, “Oranje” and “Sovereign” carrots from the University of Wisconsin, plus seeds for broccoli, celery, cress, mustard, quinoa, squash and sweet peppers.

    “These seed varieties and new strains arising from them can never be owned by anyone but the public, and that is important to us as a commercial seed company with a social mission at its core,” said Tom Stearns of High Mowing.

    To spread the word about the effort and to put the seeds into circulation, the OSSI is mailing packets to first lady Michelle Obama, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and author Michael Pollan, who wrote in The Omnivore’s Dilemma that “the single greatest lesson the garden teaches is that our relationship to the planet need not be zero-sum, and that as long as the sun still shines and people still can plan and plant, think and do, we can, if we bother to try, find ways to provide for ourselves without diminishing the world.”

    Each packet is marked with a pledge. By opening the packet, “You pledge that if you transfer these seeds or their derivatives, they will also be accompanied by this pledge.”

    “It creates a parallel system, a new space where breeders and farmers can share seeds,” Kloppenburg said of the initiative. “And because it applies to derivatives, it makes for an expanding pool of germplasm that any plant breeder can freely use.”

    Goldman said the pledge is so short it almost reads like a haiku.

    “It basically says these seeds are free to use in any way you want. They can’t be legally protected. Enjoy them.”

    Seeding a movement

    The pledge: “This Open Source Seed Pledge is intended to ensure your freedom to use the seed contained herein in any way you choose, and to make sure those freedoms are enjoyed by all subsequent users. By opening this packet, you pledge that you will not restrict others’ use of these seeds and their derivatives by patents, licenses or any other means. You pledge that if you transfer these seeds or their derivatives, you will acknowledge the source of these seeds and accompany your transfer with this pledge.”

    The store can be found online at www.opensourceseedinitiative.org/store. The introductory package, selling for $25, includes an assortment of 15 seed packets, including “Midnight Lightning” zucchini, “Red Ursa” kale, “Gatherer’s Gold” pepper, “Joker Lettuce” and more.

  • Wisconsin Assembly votes to lift barrier to new nukes

    “No nukes now. No nukes probably forever,” says environmental activist Kevin Moore.

    Moore, in the late 1980s, went to jail as a protester seeking to block the licensing of nuclear power plants.

    He’s remained active since. And, like many no-nuke demonstrators who committed to the cause in the late 1970s and 1980s, he’s baffled by the current campaign to build new plants.

    “Did I miss something?” the 72-year-old activist asked. “Did they figure out what to do with the waste?”

    The answer is no.

    Yet, the Wisconsin Assembly has passed AB 384, which would remove a barrier to building new nuclear plants enacted in 1983, four years after a meltdown at the Three Mile Island plant in Pennsylvania and three years before the explosion and fire at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine. Current state law prohibits new plants until a federal storage facility for nuclear waste is constructed.

    A Senate committee held a hearing on its version of the pro-nuclear bill, SB288, on Jan. 5, but had not voted on the measure when WiG went to press.

    Republican state Rep. Kevin Petersen, in a memo introducing the bill, described nuclear power as affordable, clean, safe and necessary.

    Proponents also argue Wisconsin needs nuclear options to comply with the Obama administration’s clean power plan, requiring energy producers to reduce carbon emissions.

    But opponents say that’s a false argument.

    “Nuclear energy is a distraction from realistic, cost-effective methods to reduce carbon emissions in Wisconsin: energy efficiency and renewable energy,” the Clean Wisconsin environmental group said in a statement on AB 384. “Nuclear is exorbitantly expensive and new plants take decades to get up and running.”

    The Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters refers to AB 384 as the “Nuking Wisconsin’s Energy Priorities Law” and has urged members to lobby their legislators.

    The Sierra Club-John Muir Chapter also opposes the measure.

    Meanwhile, the national Sierra Club has responded to a renewed nuclear energy push with a “nuclear-free future” campaign.

    “The Sierra Club remains unequivocally opposed to nuclear energy,” read a statement from the leading environmental group.

    “Although nuclear plants have been in operation for less than 60 years, we now have seen three serious disasters,” the statement continued, referring to Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and the disaster in Fukushima, Japan, in 2011. “Nuclear is no solution to climate change and every dollar spent on nuclear is one less dollar spent on truly safe, affordable and renewable energy sources.”

    The Sierra Club’s nuclear-free campaign emphasizes:

    • The issue of what to do with the long-lived waste created by the fissioning of uranium remains unresolved.

    • Uranium mining has contaminated large sections of the southwestern United States and many other areas in the world.

    • Older nuclear plants sit in areas more densely populated than when they were built and almost all leak tritium and other radionuclides into groundwater.

    • Newer nuclear plants remain expensive and need enormous amounts of water.

    • Despite what energy industry leaders claim, nuclear power has a huge carbon footprint. Carbon energy powers uranium mining, milling, processing, conversion and enrichment, as well as the formulation of fuel rods and the construction of plants.

    A letter that Sierra’s John Muir chapter sent to Wisconsin lawmakers on behalf of a Carbon-Free, Nuclear-Free Coalition warned that passage of the pro-nuclear bill could lead to the state becoming a depository for nuclear waste.

    Elizabeth Ward of the Sierra Club-John Muir Chapter, Katie Nekola of Clean Wisconsin, Amy Schulz of Physicians for Social Responsibility, Peter Skopec of Wisconsin Public Interest Research Group and Al Gedicks of Wisconsin Resources Protection Council signed the letter, along with Chuck Baynton and Judy Miner.

    The coalition said passage of the bill could “send a strong message to the Department of Energy that Wisconsin is open to hosting a nuclear waste repository. In the 1980s, the DOE ranked Wisconsin’s Wolf River Batholith as No. 2 for a second high-level nuclear waste repository. A 2008 DOE Study on the Need for a Second Repository listed Wisconsin as one of the top potential states based on our granite geology. After the cancellation of the potential Yucca Mountain repository, the DOE is desperate to find an alternative.”

    Wisconsin’s energy mix

    Wisconsin has one operational nuclear power plant, Point Beach, north of Two Rivers.

    About 15.5 percent of Wisconsin’s electricity is nuclear-generated, 62.3 percent is coal, 13.2 percent natural gas, 3.4 percent hydroelectric and 5.5 percent renewable.

    — Lisa Neff

  • Pocketful of good luck

    Pocketful of good luck

           Tucked into my wallet is a lucky charm, a metal tag engraved with “WWED?” — which stands for “what would Elvis do?”

           I also carry a chestnut that my aunt gave me a few years ago, with the suggestion that I rub the nut whenever I wish for good luck.

           I don’t panic if I leave my charms at home, but I do like to carry good luck.

           From time to time, the good luck doesn’t hold, like the occasion when I was on a tour in Ireland several years ago and asked our guide — and everyone within earshot — if he’d ever come across a lucky four-leaf clover. As soon as I spoke up, I realized this dumb American had confused a four-leaf clover and a three-leaf shamrock, which in Ireland symbolizes the Holy Trinity and in America symbolizes Ireland.

           I guess I’m not the only one to make the mistake. You might recall the hubbub after Guinness advertisements celebrating St. Patrick’s Day and beer went up in Toronto subway stations. The posters contained a maple leaf for Canada and a four-leaf clover in place of a shamrock for Ireland. The Irish Times mocked the design: “Guinness shamrock ad has one too many … leaves.”

           I’ve had the good fortune to find two four-leaf clovers in fields near Anna Maria Island, but have yet to find one on the island.

           However, I have seen other signs of good luck on the island, including rainbows minus the pots of gold, acorns, turtles, tortoises, crickets, dolphins, bamboo, ladybugs, dragonflies, frogs, eagles, two falling stars and even an elephant.

           That’s right, an elephant. I can’t claim the pachyderm encounter occurred in natural Anna Maria Island, but it was a wild afternoon thanks to the Beach Bistro’s annual St. Patrick’s Day Parade taking place.

           Trouncing along on Marina Drive in Holmes Beach, leading the parade, was an elephant, symbol of luck, long life, loyalty, wisdom, power, strength and intelligence.

           Parade organizer Sean Murphy admits an elephant has no connection to St. Patrick’s Day or Irish tradition, but claims some Irish people who indulge on that day do see elephants in their beer-instilled dreams.

           Once the star of the parade, Judy the Elephant has since died, but the tradition of the Beach Bistro’s St. Patrick’s Day Parade continues.

           Sometimes there are camels.

           This year’s parade will begin at 4 p.m. Sunday, March 17, departing from the parking lot at Marina and Gulf drives and traveling north on Marina and Palm Drive.

           Murphy said all are invited to join in the celebration — in the parade or along the parade route. Participants will include school marching bands, bagpipers from Dunedin, the DeSoto Conquistadors and the Anna Maria Island Privateers.

           My Irish eyes will be smiling.

           And I expect to spot a few shamrocks, if not four-leaf clovers.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • State of the Birds: 230 species face serious threats

    In 40 years, the population of wild passenger pigeons went from 2-3 billion to none. Today, hundreds of species, with their habitats disappearing and their climate changing, face critical threats and need conservation help.

    This week, 100 years after the extinction of the passenger pigeon, a team of scientists involved with the U.S. Committee of the North American Bird Conservation Initiative released the expansive 2014 State of the Birds Report. The document is based on extensive reviews of population data from long-term monitoring of species.

    The report’s authors identified aridlands of the West as the habitat with the steepest population declines in the nation. The report shows a 46 percent decline since 1968 for birds in Utah, Arizona and New Mexico, places where desert, sagebrush and chaparral habitats have been destroyed or fragmented by development.

    The report also emphasizes a significant threat to species that breed in the nation’s grasslands, such as the eastern meadowlark and the bobolink.

    “This report,” says Wayne Clough, secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, “highlights the threats that birds face, but it also offers hope for their future if we act together.”

    Habitat loss and fragmentation are at the top of the threat list, but invasive species also are seriously impacting birds, especially on the islands of Hawaii. One-third of U.S. federally endangered birds are Hawaiian species, according to the report’s authors.

    Meanwhile, shorebirds along the U.S. coasts are being “squeezed into shrinking strips of habitat due to development.”

    The report’s authors created a watch list, which names 233 species that are endangered or at risk of becoming endangered without significant conservation, and a list of 32 common birds in steep decline.

    The watch list includes 42 open ocean species, including the Laysan albatross and the black-footed albatross, both threatened by increased levels of oil contamination, plastic pollution and reduced prey fish due to commercial fishing operations.

    The watch list includes half of the shorebird species found in the United States, including the red knot, piping plover and long-billed curlew.

    Thirty neotropical migrants — birds that breed in North America and migrate south of the border in the winter — are on the watch list.

    The positive emphasized in the State of the Birds Report: Targeted conservation efforts directly benefit birds. The scientists observed a steady rise in populations among 49 coastal species that have access to national wildlife refuges and national seashores.

    And in the Appalachian Mountains and the Northwest, land conservation has helped declining species such as the golden-winged warbler and the oak titmouse.

    In a news release issued with the report, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell said, “Because the ‘state of the birds’ mirrors the state of their habitats, our national wildlife refuges, national parks, national seashores and other public lands are critical safe havens for many of these species — especially in the face of climate change — one of the biggest challenges to habitat conservation for all species in the 21st century.”

  • Frac sand mining threatens health, welfare in Wisconsin

    Frac sand mining threatens health, welfare in Wisconsin

    Victoria Trinko hasn’t opened the windows in her Wisconsin farmhouse in two years. And when she goes outdoors on the farm her family has operated in Chippewa County since 1936, she often wears a mask.

    Trinko lives less than a mile from a frac sand mining operation — and that’s nothing like living less than a mile from a sandy beach.

    There has been a lot of attention to the harms associated with the hydraulic fracturing method of gas and oil extraction, but much less focus on related industries. Fracking involves intensive use of chemicals, water and fuel at drilling sites, as well as extensive build-out of pipelines and the heavy use of transportation fuel for trucks, barges and train engines. It produces huge volumes of liquid waste. And fracking requires enormous volumes of fine-particle sand found in certain regions of the country, including Wisconsin and Minnesota.

    A frac sand mining operation began in 2011 near Trinko’s farm. Throughout the summer and fall of that year, Trinko, a town clerk for Cooks Valley, raised concerns at local meetings. The “dust” from the mining clung to her clothes. Grit coated her teeth. Whatever she was breathing, it irritated her throat and damaged her respiratory system.

    In a raspy voice, Trinko recently described life near a frac sand mine. She was participating in a Sept. 25 news conference call prompted by the release of a report on the proliferation of such operations in Wisconsin and Minnesota and the medical, environmental, economic consequences.

    “The billowing of silica sand has not abated since the mine was constructed in 2011,” she said.

    Trinko now suffers from asthma and lives with the daily use of an inhaler and nasal spray. People don’t like to visit the farmhouse, which her daughter said smells like someone “just swept the garage.” Trucks rumble past the farm every few minutes, five or six days a week.

    Her home, Trinko said, “is not a healthy place to live.”

    Her daughter “worries that my life expectancy is going to be shortened,” she added.

    Communities at risk

    A new report, Communities at Risk: Frac Sand Mining in the Upper Midwest, warns that thousands face threats from the 164 frac sand mining facilities concentrated in Wisconsin and Minnesota. They operate with little or no government oversight for the impacts on air and water.

    Researchers examined permitting and monitoring, water and air quality, impacts of silica dust on human health, projected declines in property values and the expense of building and rebuilding infrastructure.

    In fracking, the sand holds open the fractures created by the water, sand and chemicals pumped into the earth to allow for the extraction of natural gas and oil. The more frac sand used per well, the higher the yield. Frackers will use about 95 billion pounds of frac sand this year.

    Researchers have identified 164 active frac sand facilities and proposals for another 20 in Wisconsin and Minnesota. Their report said Wisconsin was “overrun by the industry prior to any understanding of the scale and impacts of the industry,” while Minnesota has been more cautious. The number of operations in Wisconsin increased from seven in 2010, the year Scott Walker was elected governor, to 145.

    Midwest mining

    A frac sand operation involves:

    • Removing the plants, soil or rock above a sand deposit.

    • Excavating the sand, which includes blasting and crushing.

    • Processing the sand, including rinsing it with water and chemicals.

    • Piling and storing the sand.

    • Transporting the sand.

    Eventually, the mined-out property is reclaimed, which may or may not include an effort to restore any vegetation. Opponents liken frac sand mining to mountaintop removal.

    “Rural communities are becoming industrialized. … Eliminating the bluffs facilitates groundwater contamination. Runoff into streams, wetlands and lakes threatens habitats and fisheries,” the report stated.

    Living downwind and on the route

    The mining is concentrated in southwest Wisconsin and southeast Minnesota in what is known as the Driftless Area, 23,000 square miles famous for its sandstone bluffs. It’s an area with protected and unique species and scenery that draws many tourists.

    Mapping by the Environmental Working Group found mining sites “in close proximity to schools, hospitals and clinics, where children and patients may be exposed to airborne silica,” said EWG executive director Heather White. Data indicated that in a 33-county area there are about 58,000 people living within a half mile of an existing or proposed frac sand mine or processing site. The number of people living within a mile is 162,000.

    “None of the states at the center of the current frac sand mining boom have adopted air quality standards for silica that will adequately protect the tens of thousands of people living or working near the scores of recently opened or proposed mining sites,” said White.

    “Citizens living near frac sand mining in Wisconsin are witnessing a massive destruction of their rural landscape,” said Kimberlee Wright, executive director of Midwest Environmental Advocates. “Elected officials and our states’ natural resources protection agency have largely dismissed local citizens’ concerns about their health, the health of their environment and their quality of life. Without a clearer view of the big picture of frac sand mining’s impact, laws that protect our communities’ air and water aren’t being developed or enforced.”

    Less than 10 percent of Wisconsin’s frac sand facilities are required to monitor air emissions, prompting MEA to circulate a petition asking the Wisconsin Natural Resources Board to conduct a health and environmental study.

    The report states that it was written “in an attempt to fill the vacuum of government leadership and regulatory authority” and the researchers are raising questions that “should have been posed long ago.”

    Those involved in the report recommended “a step back” in the process and more review and regulation.

    Report co-author Grant Smith said, “It is essential that local and state governments assess and take action based on the impacts of the full cycle of shale oil and gas drilling, including frac sand mining. Health, water and … economic concerns should be addressed comprehensively, rather than being ignored or dismissed. Protecting public health and safety is the first responsibility of government.”

    White added, “We need strong state action to protect the public health from yet another troubling side effect of the unprecedented wave of shale gas development.”

    The urgency is that frac sand mining grew 30 percent from 2013, 50 percent more than projected, and it could spread to other states with untapped or largely untapped frac sand deposits, including Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Vermont and Virginia.

    Serious concerns

    White and Trinko detailed the concerns for mining in the area, along with Wright; Dr. Peter W. Holm of Chippewa Falls; Civil Society Institute energy policy adviser Smith; and Crispin Pierce, of the Environmental Public Health Program at University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.

    The issues:

    • A mining operation daily withdraws up to 2 million gallons of water that is mixed with a compound called polyacrylamide flocculent to treat the sand. That compound itself is non-toxic. But its production method may leave minute traces of a neurotoxin. As piled sand dries, acrylamide-laden water can seep into groundwater. Also, there can be acid runoff from mines.

    • The primary air pollutant is silica dust. The most dangerous type of  particle mentioned in the report is fine particulate matter, dust smaller than 2.5 micrometers, less than one-seventh the width of a human hair. These particles are associated with asthma, lung disease, cardiovascular disease, birth defects and premature death. Silica particles — they aren’t weatherworn like beach sand but instead have sharp, jagged edges — are produced in mining and dispersed in the processing and hauling of the sand.

    • Crystalline silica, created when silica is crushed or exploded, occurs in the operations. The tiny particles can be ingested and become lodged in the lungs. Intense exposure can cause disease in a year, but it can take 10-15 years for symptoms to appear. Exposure has been linked to tuberculosis, emphysema, bronchitis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, anemia, chronic thyroiditis and kidney-related diseases.

    • Before-and-after satellite images at mining sites show devastating impacts on the landscape.

    • Frac sand mining can result in substantial declines in property value, local tax revenues, business revenue, decreased life span of roads, increased health care costs and negative impacts on school funding.

  • Rattling the cage: Court weighs in on personhood for non-humans

    Rattling the cage: Court weighs in on personhood for non-humans

    A New York court will decide this fall whether to apply “legal personhood” to an animal in a first-of-its-kind lawsuit filed on behalf of Tommy the Chimp.

    On Oct. 8, a panel of five judges for the New York State Appeals Court heard from attorney Steven M. Wise, with the nonprofit Nonhuman Rights Project, on behalf of a 26-year-old chimpanzee.

    Tommy is owned as a pet and kept in a “dank shed” in upstate New York. Wise wants him to be relocated to the world’s largest chimpanzee retreat, the Save the Chimps sanctuary in Fort Pierce, Florida. He also wants to convince the court that primates and other intelligent animals are entitled to “legal personhood” and deserving of such basic rights as freedom from imprisonment.

    “No one has ever demanded a common law legal right for a nonhuman animal until now,” Wise said, asserting that his legal claim for Tommy is rooted in genetic, cognitive, evolutionary and taxonomic evidence that chimps are self-aware and autonomous.

    Tommy’s case was filed in New York’s court system in December 2013, along with other lawsuits seeking the release of:

    • Kiko, a 26-year-old chimp who lives in a cage on private property in Niagara Falls and was previously used in the entertainment industry.

    • Hercules and Leo, young chimps who are owned by the New Iberia Research Center and used in biomedical research in the anatomy department at Stony Brook University in Stony Brook, New York.

    In a parallel campaign, the NHRP is building a series of lawsuits on behalf of elephants, another highly intelligent species, being held in circuses and zoos.

    Other organizations also are advocating personhood status for animals — elephants, dolphins and whales, as well as chimps, gorillas, orangutans and bonobos, humans’ closest relatives in the animal kingdom.

    “There are 15 features to the human personality,” said animal rights advocate Shirley Maewhether of Madison. “A corporation doesn’t have them and yet it can have legal personhood. The great apes do have them all: intelligence, self-control, sense of time, sense of past, concern and care for others, curiosity, an ability to reason, feelings.

    “They are not things. They are nonhuman persons.”

    On Oct. 8, the judges in Albany who heard Tommy’s case asked:

    • Isn’t legal personhood just about human beings? Wise observed that courts have extended legal person status to non-human entities and things.

    • If relocated, wouldn’t Tommy still be confined? Wise said the chimp currently is in solitary confinement in a warehouse-like setting, but the sanctuary consists of 13 islands and an artificial lake.

    • Why aren’t animal welfare groups involved in the case? Wise said Tommy’s case is about unlawful imprisonment rather than animal welfare.

    “Keeping a legal person in solitary confinement in a cage is unlawful,” Wise said.

    The appeals court is expected to issue a ruling in six to eight weeks.

    Then, in December, comes Kiko’s day in court.

  • Communities enact bans on GMO crops

    Communities enact bans on GMO crops

    Two Oregon farmers are defending a local ordinance in federal court in a campaign to protect their harvests and create a zone free of genetically engineered crops.

    The Center for Food Safety and Our Family Farms Coalition joined the farmers in the defense of the Jackson County ordinance approved by voters in May 2014. Campaigns are underway to enact similar measures in other parts of the country, including in Wisconsin.

    In the Oregon county, the ordinance passed 66-34 percent, despite opposition from the chemical industry, which spent nearly $1 million on its campaign against the local law that now faces a legal challenge.

    “Across the United States today, family farmers growing traditional crops are being threatened by crops that have been genetically engineered to survive heavy pesticides or produce their own insecticide,” said Elise Higley, a farmer and director of Our Family Farms Coalition. “Monsanto, Syngenta and other chemical giants have created a product they simply cannot control and which puts the livelihood of family farmers everywhere at risk.”

    Tom Buchele, an attorney with Earthrise, which is involved in the legal defense of the ordinance, said their case is about a farmer’s right to protect crops from contamination and valuing a democratic vote.

    Transgenic contamination is the transfer of genetically engineered crops to conventional, organic or wild plants. When contamination occurs, traditional farmers can lose the opportunity to sell in GE-sensitive domestic and foreign markets or to customers who avoid genetically modified foods.

    “When I learned that Syngenta was growing genetically engineered sugar beets close to my farm, I had little choice but to tear up the crops I was already growing that were likely to be contaminated,” said Chris Hardy, one of the farmers defending the ordinance. “No farmer should have to worry about whether a patented product of Monsanto is going to drift onto their property and threaten their farm.”

    Other communities with zones restricting the use of genetically engineered seeds or plants include Boulder, Colorado; San Juan County, Washington; Montville, Maine; and Marin County, California.

    Some states, including Wisconsin, have limited laws addressing the use of genetically engineered plants or organisms. Other states, including Iowa and Indiana, have laws against local control of GMOs.

    Activists are engaged in at least two related campaigns in Wisconsin. Right to Know GMO is promoting GMO labeling in the state and a petition is circulating on MoveOn.org to declare La Pointe and Madeline Island in Ashland County a zone free of genetically engineered crops.

  • Activists fight to protect wolves from hunts

    The U.S. House of Representatives recently voted to strip wolves of federal protections in Wyoming, Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.

    The 242–161 vote was on amending a hunting bill, the Sportsmen’s Heritage and Recreational Enhancement Act. 

    “This vote by the U.S. House of Representatives is a crack at the very foundation of the Endangered Species Act, a law that has a 99 percent success rate at pulling species back from the brink of extinction,” said Drew Caputo of the environmental group Earthjustice. “Ninety percent of Americans from across the political spectrum support the act. If we continue down this slippery slope, we could end up in a world where our children or grandchildren might never again see a bald eagle, or a breaching whale, or hear the cry of a wolf in the wild.”

    Amendment sponsors include U.S. Reps. Reid Ribble of Wisconsin, Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, Dan Benishek of Michigan, and Collin Peterson of Minnesota.

    Their measure, which the House voted for in late February, would override the federal court rulings that state management plans do not sufficiently protect wolves and return species management to states. This could again allow for the trophy hunting of Great Lakes wolves and the killing of wolves in most of Wyoming, where a management plan would provide for shooting wolves on site.

    The amendment also contains a clause precluding further judicial review of the removal of federal protections in Wyoming, Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.

    “If enacted, this legislation could prove devastating for the recovery of wolves in the continental United States,” said Caputo. “What’s at stake here is whether wolves in Wyoming and the Great Lakes will again face the same unregulated killing that nearly wiped them out in the first place.”

    The House vote came less than two months after Congress rejected a rider to an omnibus spending bill that would have removed Endangered Species Act protections for gray wolves in the Great Lakes and Wyoming.

    A similar push is on in the U.S. Senate. In January, the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works added a provision to the Sportsmen’s Act to subvert the judicial process and delist wolves. Currently, gray wolves in Minnesota are listed as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act and as “endangered” in Wyoming, Wisconsin and Michigan.

    Both the House and Senate measures would order the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to reissue a rule to delist the gray wolf. The rule was first issued in late 2011 and cleared the way for states to manage wolf populations, which quickly led to the slaughter of wolves.

    Hunting wolves

    Wisconsin legislators legalized the use of firearms and crossbows to kill wolves. The state also legalized the baiting, trapping and hounding of wolves.

    “In Wisconsin, wolves are killed in some of the most brutal ways,” said Wendy Keefover, manager of The Humane Society of the United States’ native carnivore protection program. “Wisconsin is the only state where you can hound wolves. You can bait wolves. You can use neck snares to trap a wolf. …Wisconsin has some of the most egregious ways to kill.”

    Different numbers can be found for the wolf hunts held in 2012–13, 2013–14 and 2014–15 in Wisconsin.

    Data from HSUS shows:

    • 2012–13: The 2012 winter wolf count was 779–804 in 205 packs. The proposed hunting quota was 201 wolves. The DNR reported the killing of 117 wolves: 56 hunted and 61 trapped.
    • 2013–14: The wolf population was 660–689 in 197 packs. During that “season,” 17 wolf packs disappeared and the population declined by 19 percent. The HSUS said 65 wolves were killed for livestock depredation, 21 died in vehicle collisions, 59 were killed illegally, and hunters and trappers killed 257 wolves. Some 16,672 applications were filed and 1,879 permits were sold for the trophy hunt.
    • 2014–15: The state issued 1,500 permits to hunters and trappers and set a hunt quota of 156 wolves, prompting an appeal from The HSUS, which said the pace of trophy hunting, along with poaching, would cause a population crash. The HSUS estimated the total number of wolves killed was 301. Less than a week into the hunt, the DNR closed four of the six zones, with half the zones exceeding quotas.

    “There was such a rush to hunt,” said Melissa Tedrowe, Wisconsin state director for The HSUS.

    “After delisting, the only management tool offered by our state or the other states was to kill wolves,” said environmental activist Kelly Powell of Madison. “That isn’t a management plan. That’s slaughter. That isn’t the way to deal with a recovering species.”

    The official wolf hunting season in Wisconsin ended in early December 2014.

    That month, a federal judge overturned the delisting of the Great Lakes wolves, putting permitted hunts on hold.

    Benishek, in a statement, said the delisting amendment “was based on valuable input from both Michigan and federal officials in order to use sound science to responsibly manage the wolf population while also meeting the needs of local communities. As the number of wolves has increased well beyond the recommended number for recovery, there has been a negative impact on other species and a constant threat to livestock and pets.”

    The delisting measure has the support of Safari Club International, a hunting group, and the National Rifle Association, the largest gun ownership group in the United States.

    On the opposing side, Earthjustice, the Center for Biological Diversity and The Humane Society of the United States, along with many state and local organizations, maintain that the congressional push to delist wolves does not involve sound science or responsible management, nor does it have widespread public support.

    “I just really want to emphasize that the American public and the majority of Wisconsinites value and appreciate wolves as they icon that they are,” said Keefover.

    She and Tedrowe said the drive to delist is based on myths about wolves as predators and ignores the role of large carnivores in the ecosystem.

    A year ago, a coalition of animal protection and conservation organizations suggested reclassifying the gray wolf under the Endangered Species Act as threatened throughout the contiguous United States. That move would continue federal oversight and funding for species recovery efforts but provide some regulatory flexibility to address wolf conflicts.

    “A congressional end run around science and the Endangered Species Act will create more controversy and put wolves and the law itself in jeopardy,” Kieran Suckling, executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, said at the time. “The better path is to downlist wolves to threatened, replace the failed piecemeal efforts of the past with a new science-based recovery strategy and bring communities together to determine how wolves will be returned to and managed in places where they once lived.”

    The proposal pending in the Senate and the measure that passed the House does not take that approach. Another version of the Senate bill lacks the delisting amendment, and others opposed by animal welfare advocates and environmentalists.

    Activists also have grave concerns that lawmakers may attach riders to budget bills providing for the delisting of gray wolves in the Great Lakes and Wyoming.

    Recommended reading …

    Wyoming’s dire plans for the wolves by Tim Preso of EarthJustice.

  • Share the road, share a bike

    Share the road, share a bike

           “Too much traffic.”

           “Just wait until season.”

           I hear these complaints on Anna Maria Island at least as often as I hear this statement, “What a beautiful sunset.”

           Local officials — elected and hired — hear the complaints as well, which is why they have called on state, regional and academic transportation planners for advice and help to deal with congestion and parking.

           Repeated among the expert recommendations year after year: Support and increase the use of nonmotorized modes of transportation.

           For example, the massive, multiyear, multicounty study of transportation on the barrier islands set to end next spring contains proposals for traffic fixes. For Anna Maria Island, six of the short-term recommendations involve boosting walking and biking.

           Building new infrastructure is one approach.

           But an easy way to get more people on bikes is to make more bikes available.

           An easy way to make more bikes available is with bike-sharing systems.

           Why would a city such as Holmes Beach not support a tool that promotes the island’s goal of encouraging nonmotorized modes of transportation?

           Why would a city such as Holmes Beach not support a tool that reduces demand for automobile parking?

           I can’t explain any more than I can explain opposition to a system based on the premise of sustainable transportation.

           Bike-share differs from the bike rentals on the island, which typically are rented from a storefront and returned to the same location.

           The bike-share concept is simple: Bikes are stationed throughout a community so a rider can cycle from point A to point B and need not return to A.

           Bike-sharing systems are not new. The bike-share wave began more than a decade ago in the United States and services and ridership continue to increase. Nationwide, in 2011, there were an estimated 2.3 million bike-share trips. In 2016, the number was 28 million and, in 2017, the number went up to 35 million, according to research by the National Association of City Transportation Officials.

           In Florida, bike-share systems operate in more than a dozen communities, extending the reach of where people can travel without getting in a car, expanding their geographic circles, and encouraging a healthier, greener way of life.

           Another survey in Portland, Oregon, found about 26% of bike-share rides replaced what would have been a car trip, and a 2016 survey in Denver found 47% of bike-share rides replaced car trips.

           An Oregon study found ridership numbers would go even higher if more communities installed dedicated bike lanes.

           NACTO executive director Linda Bailey says bike-share is an integral part of the day-to-day transportation mix in many locations, “and we see no end in sight to this flourishing new mobility option.”

           But she’s not looking at Anna Maria Island, where the end might come without a beginning.

           I think a prohibition would impact residents more than tourists.

           Think about the riders in a bike-share service on Anna Maria Island,

           Rental bikes serve tourists’ needs, as they’re terrific for daylong fun rides or even weekly or monthly rentals.

           But bike-share systems can meet the needs of residents not likely to rent a bike and residents who may or may not own a bike.

           A resident might cycle to the store, then trolley home with purchases.

           A resident might cycle to a trolley stop, then trolley to work.

           A resident might cycle to the community center, then walk to the pier, then cycle home.

           A resident might ask, why drive a car and generate more pollution when a bike will do?

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Spouting silliness, seriousness

    Spouting silliness, seriousness

           Waterspouts certainly stir up excitement on Anna Maria Island.

           To confirm, just ask to see the March 27 analytics for The Islander’s Facebook page. That morning, a waterspout formed in the Gulf of Mexico and moved east, toward the island. Witnesses posted photographs to their social media accounts, as well as to The Islander’s Facebook page, where likes, shares and comments compounded to drive views across our community and beyond.

           I contributed one of the photographs, taken from east of the Anna Maria Island Bridge near a stop for the Manatee County Area Transit No. 3 bus, which runs on Manatee Avenue/State Road 64 between the public beach and Interstate 75.

           That morning, I cycled through the various stages of witnessing the development of potentially severe weather — hmm, cool, umm, uh-oh and whew. 

           I’d visited the Kingfish Boat Ramp, then hiked east across the bridge, where I lingered to look for dolphins, and decided to catch the bus to the mainland near the entrance to Neal Preserve. 

           I was waiting at the bus stop, watching puffs of dirt rise with the demolition of the sales office at One Particular Harbour, when I noticed storm clouds in the west. Hmm. Did the clouds form with my back turned as I crossed the bridge?

           The sky darkened and I noticed a white, vertical column. A waterspout? Cool. 

           I took out my iPhone, took a few photos, posted to Facebook, texted colleagues, joked with some friends and other silliness.

           Then I thought about the nature of waterspouts — they can be associated with severe storms and have all the characteristics of land tornadoes. And waterspouts can become tornadoes on land. Umm.

           Next stage: Uh-oh. I thought about the approaching storm, all that I didn’t know about that waterspout, the new enough MacBook in the bag over my shoulder and the unpredictable wait time for the MCAT bus.

           I jogged to Neal Preserve before sprinkles turned to a driving rain and found cover at a picnic shelter. From there, I watched the waterspout move east, then south and then disappear. Whew.

           An hour later, the blue skies and bright sunlight were back.

           We see our share of thunderstorms and occasional waterspouts and for many people on the island the morning’s weather probably was ordinary, even forgettable.

           But a couple of people wagged a finger my way, leaving me to wonder why people take risks in threatening or severe weather. 

           I couldn’t tell whether I was seeing a tornadic or fair-weather waterspout, but I know waterspouts can carry fish, frogs, turtles, even children.

           I couldn’t tell the strength or size of the waterspout, but I know they can be thousands of feet tall.

           That morning, I was like a kid in a lightning storm, or a motorist driving through a flooded road, a homeowner pushing the snowblower with temperatures 25 below zero, a golfer playing an 18th hole in a thunderstorm, an islander watching the hurricane brew from the beach.

           Will I be silly or serious next time? 

           Hmm.

           At least I purchased an umbrella — that day, on my phone, while waiting for my ride.

    Did you know?

           The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration says waterspouts probably occur more frequently in the Florida Keys than anywhere in the world. About 400-500 waterspouts a year may form around the Keys.

           However, while the Keys may have more waterspouts, the Tampa Bay region has the greatest number of damaging waterspouts, according to NOAA.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Study: 4 billion microplastic particles pollute Tampa Bay

    Study: 4 billion microplastic particles pollute Tampa Bay

           New research estimates about 4 billion microplastic particles exist in Tampa Bay.

           The study from the University of South Florida and Eckerd College in St. Petersburg provides the first measurement of microplastic “abundance and distribution” in surface waters and sediment in the bay.

           The microplastics, about the size of plankton, can be ingested by birds, fish, amphipods and marine organisms, and emerging evidence indicates ingestion can be toxic to the marine organisms.

           The study, published in the scientific journal Marine Pollution Bulletin, contains these conclusions:

           • Microplastic particles are widely dispersed and abundant in surface water and sediments in the bay.

           • The bay contains about 4 billion microplastic particles.

           • Dry sediment around the bay contains about 3 trillion microplastic particles.

           • Each gallon of tested water contained four microplastic particles.

           • Each pound of tested sediment contained about 600 microplastic particles.

           • The highest concentrations of microplastics can be found close to industry and the lowest levels can be found in middle and lower Tampa Bay.

           • Unusually high microplastic concentrations can be found after intense or prolonged rainfall in Tampa Bay.

           To conduct the study, researchers established 24 stations in Tampa Bay, including north of Anna Maria Island, and monitored microplastic concentrations for 14 months.

           “We measure microplastic abundance at … the mouth of major rivers, small tributaries, close to wastewater treatment facilities, near industrial facilities and near relatively pristine coastal mangroves,” the researchers wrote.

           Their goal was to present the first reliable estimates of microplastics in the largest open-water estuary in the state.

           The most common microplastics in the bay are fibers — thin, thread-like plastics.

           The fibers might come from the laundering of synthetic fabrics, which reach the bay via wastewater treatment facilities, and they might come from the breakdown of synthetic fishing lines, nets and ropes.

           In analyzing a connection between rainfall and pollution, the researchers found many water samples contained twice the average number of microplastics after intense precipitation. 

           They theorized that the heavier pollution was caused by increased discharges from rivers and stormwater runoff during heavy rains. Their theory was supported by the fact that microplastic contamination did not spike after heavy rains in Lower Tampa Bay, which is more influenced by the Gulf of Mexico than rain-driven runoff.

           The study contains two more conclusions:

           • Although it is tempting to clean up the mess, it is impractical, if not impossible, to remove the microplastics from the water column or separate microplastic contamination from sediments.

           • Only by eliminating the sources of plastics and microplastic particles can we decrease the risks in Tampa Bay.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Uprooting tree protections

    Uprooting tree protections

           I walked into a Holmes Beach city park searching for one type of memorial and came upon another.

           Under a leafy canopy at the edge of the park near the 63rd Street boat ramp stands a “Trees of Memory” plaque. 

           The memorial recognizes the people for whom trees have been planted in Holmes Beach.

           Anna Maria and Bradenton Beach also have recognized in other ways the people who promote planting trees, and the elected officials in all three cities have worked to adopt or amend rules aimed at protecting trees, in particular those grand trees with deeper roots on Anna Maria Island than most inhabitants.

           State lawmakers and the governor apparently care less for the living memories among us, having placed into law a measure making it more difficult for local government to restrict the removal of trees from private property.

           Proponents of H.B. 1159 said they sought to protect private property rights against aggressive power-grabs by local governments.

           Opponents of the measure offered two basic arguments: Legislators sought to weaken local home rule in favor of growing state power and sided with money and development over nature and conservation.

           After Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the bill in June, a Tallahassee Democrat story, “Canopy Crossroad? Law removes local oversight on tree work,” was carried by news outlets around the world via The Associated Press.

           Meanwhile, in city halls across the state, city attorneys informed their mayors and commissioners that tree-protection ordinances were weakened if not voided.

           The law basically says a private property owner with a note from a licensed landscaper or a certified arborist can take down a tree that poses a danger to people or property.

           In Florida, where the hurricane season spans six months of the year, a property owner could say any tree poses a danger and hire a landscaper to support that claim.

           The law doesn’t require the “tree expert” to examine the tree or visit the property.

           And the law doesn’t require the property owner to show anyone the note from the expert.

           Florida lawmakers gave property owners permission to chop, chop, chop.

           Still, as a longtime friend and conservative columnist once told me, “Just because it’s not outlawed doesn’t mean you should do it.”

           He was referring to businesses not prohibited by the government from discriminating against gay people, but his same statement can be applied here. Just because the state made it easier to chop down a tree doesn’t mean you should chop down a tree.

           Each living tree should be prized.

           As the plaque at Holmes Beach City Park reads: “What do we plant when we plant a tree? We plant the ship which will cross the sea. We plant the house for you and me. We plant the shade from the hot sun free. We plant a thousand things we daily see. We plant all these things when we plant a tree and we plant a memory that will ever be.”

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Wondering about winter weather?

    Wondering about winter weather?

           Groundhog Day came and went Feb. 2 without fanfare on Anna Maria Island.

           Islanders who woke up to chilly temperatures Feb. 1 were confident that a warmer temperature would arrive with high noon’s sunshine.

           “What do we care how long winter lasts?” one might ask the groundhog. 

           In fact, longer winters in the Northern Hemisphere mean more lucrative tourist seasons for island business owners. 

           But those who were caught in the lock of the polar vortex do care how much more winter weather they must endure. 

           For the record, the groundhog didn’t see its shadow, meaning an early spring. 

           And that’s about as scientific a statement as claiming severe snowstorms and subzero temperatures disprove global warming.

           In late January, a series of snowstorms and record-breaking cold struck the Midwest, factoring in the deaths of more than 20 people, as well as punchlines for climate-change deniers who maintain that wintery weather is controvertible evidence in a global-warming debate.

           For many in science and government, the time for debate passed long ago.

           When the climate-change deniers’ tweets went viral in the vortex, scientists answered untruths and misinformation with basic lessons on the difference between “weather” and “climate.”

           The difference between weather and climate is a measure of time, as weather is what conditions of the atmosphere are over a short period, and climate is how the atmosphere behaves over long periods.

           On its climate webpage, NASA explains, “In short, climate is the description of the long-term pattern of weather in a particular area.”

           National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, seeking to inform and educate Jan. 29, circulated via Twitter a cartoon from its climate.gov, saying, “Winter storms don’t prove that global warming isn’t happening.”

           NOAA, at climate.gov, also resurrected a 2015 explainer on winter weather and climate change.

           Here’s one passage from the seven-page document: “Not only are severe snowstorms possible in a warming climate, there is some evidence that cold-season storms in the Northern Hemisphere have become more frequent and more intense since 1950.”

           Another point made in the document: “While researchers sort out the science and overcome the challenges involved in making predictions, it’s certain that snowstorms will not be going away anytime soon. Earth has plenty of wiggle room before it warms so much that we will stop seeing snow anywhere in winter.”

           What’s the risk of leaving misinformation unchallenged? 

           What’s the danger of climate-change denial?

           Inaction, of course.

           Every level of government must act to deal with climate change. Jan. 29, the day temperatures plummeted in the Midwest to minus 20 or more, our local government leaders gathered as the Manatee Council of Governments in the Bradenton Area Convention Center in Palmetto to address, among other topics, climate change and preparing for rising sea levels.

           Thankfully, the discussion did not devolve into a debate over whether global warming is occurring and sea level rise is a reality. 

           Manatee County School Board member Charlie Kennedy summed up where local officials must concentrate and determine their actions: “We’re focusing on the science.”

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • About mighty mangroves

    About mighty mangroves

           Listen.

           That’s an alarm sounding on the west end of Perico Island.

           A Harbour Isle resident is raising concerns about construction work taking place in the mangroves on Perico, as reported in this issue of the newspaper by journalist Kathy Prucnell.

                  But the city of Bradenton apparently isn’t dispatching any aid to the resident’s call.

                  Developer Michael Neal of Neal Communities has plans for four single-family homes on 3.46 acres of the island, where the Neal family trust owns about 40 acres of shoreline on Anna Maria Sound.

           Disputes over the environmental impact of the Neal project have gone on for years. Most recently, Perico resident Debbie Wilcox turned to the city of Bradenton to appeal a permit that cleared the way for construction work — or destructive work — in the mangroves. (See story page 26).

           Some facts about the tropical mangroves provided by the nonprofit environmental group Conservation International and the Nature Conservancy include:

           • Mangrove forests exist on the coasts of 118 tropical and subtropical countries, totaling more than 85,000 square miles — roughly the size of Arkansas.

           • The United States has about 1,500 square miles of mangroves — located almost entirely in Florida.

           • Mangroves can be up to 10 times more efficient than terrestrial ecosystems at the absorption and long-term storage of carbon, making them a critical solution in the fight against climate change.

           • Mangroves, with their thick, impenetrable roots, provide natural buffers against storm surges.

           • Fish flock to mangroves, which provide habitat for thousands of marine species, from 1-inch gobies to 10-foot sharks. In Florida, mangroves provide nursery territory for shrimp, crab, redfish, snook and tarpon.

           Yes, mangroves are mighty miracles of nature, thriving in conditions that would kill most timber to create buffers against rising seas, reduce erosion, provide nesting sites for birds and much more. 

           But they can’t thrive in the conditions created by some developers in Florida. Mangrove forests once bordered the coasts and surrounded estuaries, but many have been lost to development, as well as water pollution from herbicides and pesticides.

           And globally in the past half-century, 50% of the mangroves have been lost. If the trend continues, mangroves could be gone within the next 100 years.

  • Can we get a witness?

    Can we get a witness?

           The reward is posted.

           Now, to get word to the witnesses.

           The federal government is offering a reward of up to $20,000 for information that leads to a civil penalty or criminal conviction of the person or persons responsible for the deaths of two dolphins on Florida’s Gulf Coast.

           Biologists with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission discovered a dead dolphin off the Naples coast in the week ending Feb. 9. The animal suffered a fatal wound, possibly from a bullet or sharp object.

           Within the same week, Emerald Coast Wildlife Refuge experts recovered from Pensacola Beach a dolphin with a bullet in its left side.

           A dolphin, also with a fatal puncture wound to its head, was found off Captiva Island in May 2019. 

           Since 2002, at least 29 dolphins have stranded in the Southeast United States and there is evidence that they were shot by guns or arrows or impaled with objects like fishing spears.

           Four incidents have occurred within the last year. 

           A spokeswoman at Mote Marine Laboratory in Sarasota said studies by the Sarasota Dolphin Research Program — a Chicago Zoological Society program in partnership and based at Mote — indicate that the Naples region and Sarasota region communities of dolphins are distinct from one another.

           “Both communities have a high degree or residency, meaning they usually stay in the region” and are not migratory,” said Stephanie Kettle, public relations manager at Mote.

           Most human-caused mortalities of Sarasota dolphins are related to fishing gear entanglement and boat strikes, Kettle said.

           Not since the 1980s has Mote documented “a purposeful, malicious human interaction with a dolphin” in the Sarasota region, according to Kettle.

           “We do continue to educate the public to never harass or attempt to feed dolphins,” she said.

           The U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits hunting, killing or feeding wild dolphins, or attempting to do these activities.

           Violations can be prosecuted either civilly or criminally.

           They are punishable by up to $100,000 in fines and up to one year in jail per violation.

           Officials with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration are seeking information from anyone who may have details about the incidents.

           Tips can be called into the NOAA Enforcement Hotline at 800-853-1964.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Fighting fracking in Florida

    Fighting fracking in Florida

           Broaden the ban in the bills.

           That’s the call of the environmental activists, elected officials and business leaders who joined April 4 in a statement supporting a comprehensive fracking ban in Florida. 

           More than 150 officeholders and more than 235 representatives from businesses in the state signed letters calling for a comprehensive ban, according to Food and Water Watch, a national nonprofit focused on accountability relating to food, water and corporate overreach.

           “Fracking anywhere in Florida is fracking everywhere in Florida,” said Brooke Errett, a Florida organizer with Food and Water Watch.

           Bills to ban some forms of fracking have advanced in the Legislature, which convened in early March, but none would prohibit “matrix acidizing,” a process in which highly concentrated chemicals go into wells to dissolve the earth and stimulate production.

           The letters, delivered April 4 to the Bradenton office of Senate President Bill Galvano, encouraged the Republican to lead lawmakers to pass a comprehensive ban — this year, before the regular session concludes May 3.

           The letter from officeholders included the signatures of Manatee County Commissioners Carol Whitmore, Betsy Benac, Vanessa Baugh and Misty Servia. Whitmore, an at-large representative, grew up on Anna Maria Island and served as mayor and commissioner in Holmes Beach.

           Holmes Beach Commissioners Carol Soustek and Pat Morton also signed the letter, as did Anna Maria Commissioners Amy Tripp, Carol Carter, Doug Copeland and Brian Seymour.

           As of April 4, no one from Bradenton Beach had signed the letter, which stated, in part, “Despite growing concerns, the oil industry is pushing to drill in local communities around the state. Without a statewide fracking ban, there are few protections in place to stop those conventional drilling wells from turning into fracking wells.”

           The signers also united in this statement: “Fracking requires several million gallons of water for each well and is a significant threat to water quality and availability in Florida. Our aquifers do not have enough water to spare for the massive amount of water needed to frack.”

           Here’s a summary — from Food and Water Watch — of the problems with fracking:

           • Fracking water contamination destroys drinking water.

           • Fracking produces massive volumes of toxic and radioactive waste, and the disposal of the waste causes earthquakes and puts drinking water resources at risk.

           • Fracking pumps hazardous pollutants into the air — more than 100 chemicals known to cause illnesses, including cancer.

           • Fracking destabilizes the climate, as the wells release large amounts of methane gas, which is known to trap 87 times more heat than carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in the decades after it is emitted.

           • Fracking causes accidents, leaks and spills. More than 7,500 accidents related to fracking occurred in 2013, negatively impacting water quality in rivers, streams and shallow aquifers.

           Industry already has fracked in Collier County, and permits are being sought for fracking operations in Calhoun and Santa Rosa counties.

           Officials in 90 municipalities in the state have passed measures against fracking, but supporters say the Legislature needs to enact a statewide ban to protect Florida’s natural resources and economy, specifically the tourism base. 

           Local business representatives who signed a second letter include Walter Jenkins of H2Global, Charlotte Mansor of Mr. Bones BBQ, Joseph and Christofer Dale of The Feast Restaurant, Kelly Headley of Cove, Julie Kirkwood of Segs by the Sea, Terrence Keith of Back Alley Treasures, Deborah Myers of Bridge St. Interiors and Tracey Cusack of Cream of AMI.

           An April 4 request from The Islander to Galvano’s office for comment was not returned as of press time.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Fish food for thought

    Fish food for thought

           Proponents of a plan for the first fish farm in the Gulf of Mexico call the project innovative, sustainable aquaculture.

           Opponents say the project would pollute the Gulf and raise economic concerns for Florida’s Gulf coast.

           Any and all could hear the pitches and the protests at a meeting set for Jan. 28 at Mote Marine Laboratory in Sarasota, after press time for The Islander. At the hearing, the Environmental Protection Agency was to collect public comment on Kampachi Farms’ application for a pollution discharge permit.

           A federal rule finalized in 2016 allows commercial aquaculture operations in U.S. Gulf waters.

           With no one biting, the Hawaiian-based Kampachi proposed the pilot fish farm — a pen, really — about 45 miles southwest of Longboat Pass in water with a depth of 130 feet. The site, according to EPA documents, is on a portion of the west Florida shelf “heavily trawled by the shrimp fishing industry.”

           Kampachi proposes hanging a copper-alloy mesh cage about 17 meters in diameter, about 40 meters below the water’s surface, using a mooring system that can rotate with the current. The setup also involves anchors and a feed barge.

           The pen would hold 20,000 almaco jack for about 12 months, so the fish can grow from fingerlings to a market-ready 4.4 pounds each.

           Other stakeholders in the project include Florida Sea Grant, which awards funding for aquaculture research, and Mote Marine Laboratory, which would hatch the fish in a land-based tank.

           Kampachi isn’t new to mariculture. The company has tested fish pens off the Hawaiian coast and Time magazine awarded the company a Best Invention of the Year award for its Velella Beta-test pen, which, in addition to “growing” fish, can provide a dive site for snorkel tours and attract fish appealing to charterboat tours.

           If the trial in the Gulf works, Kampachi makes clear that more fish farms would be proposed in federal waters.

           And that’s one of the reasons opposition to the project is substantial.

           More than a dozen of some of the nation’s leading environmental groups challenged the draft permit.

           A joint letter to the EPA signed by representatives of Friends of the Earth, Center for Biological Diversity, Food and Water Watch, Sierra Club Grassroots Network and others said the EPA failed to “fully acknowledge the breadth of socio-economic, public health and environmental problems associated with marine finfish aquaculture.”

           Issuing the permit would be “folly and vulnerable to legal challenge,” they said.

           The opponents cited pollution as a top concern — 20,000 fish reaching a total mass of 88,000 pounds will produce a lot of poop, resulting in the discharge of “untreated, industrial wastewater from the facility directly into the surrounding ocean.”

           Other concerns: farmed fish spills, parasites, disease, conflicts with marine life, use of antibiotics, harm to wild fisheries and coastal economies and devastation of native wild fish stocks.

           To these concerns, proponents have rebuttals, No. 1 being an argument that sustainable fish farms protect wild fish stocks. 

           Sustainably meeting market demand is an important question to answer.

           Proponents of the Kampachi project say the fish farm is like a demonstration garden.

           Opponents say it is like a floating feedlot.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Good trees, good people

    Good trees, good people

             An osprey walked into the property appraiser’s office.

             Could be the opening line of a joke, right? 

             Ospreys don’t own property; they can’t obtain deeds or qualify for homestead exemptions or apply for permits to improve their nests.

             So we have the responsibility — legally and morally — to safeguard the habitat of the birds and other wildlife on Anna Maria Island.

             Once, some years back, I was standing on a sunny corner of Pine Avenue in Anna Maria trying to figure out, “What’s different?” when Mike Miller, perhaps the city’s best-known native plant guru, approached.

             Miller, who died last year, answered my question. A seagrape with a thick, broad canopy was gone — “disappeared” was the word he used.

             The conversation turned to all that was lost with the removal of the seagrape, which Miller said provided seed and fruit for birds and mammals, while bees and other pollinators had flocked to its flowers.

             Plus, Miller observed, fallen seagrape leaves provide a natural mulch, free groundcover for sand, shell and dirt.

             We had a long conversation on that hot, shadeless corner about the abundance and beauty provided by island-appropriate native plants.

             Anyone familiar with Mike Miller knows just how lengthy the conversation became, as we talked about groundcover, vines, grasses, wildflowers and canopy trees best suited for coastal hammocks, saline wetlands, tidal lands and maritime forests, as well as the best plants for the pine flatwoods on the nearby mainland.

             We also talked about a duty to leave nature alone and, at a minimum, when change becomes necessary, do no harm.

             Readers of The Islander know about some people among us who fail in this responsibility by disrupting nests, toppling seed-bearing trees, polluting water and poisoning landscapes. Some people may be misguided in their actions. Greed drives others, especially those who do harm after they’re made aware of their threat to wildlife.

             But readers of The Islander also are familiar with the hopeful stories of local people who fight to protect nesting species, walk the beach to monitor sea turtle activity, survey wildlife populations to chart their rise and fall, plant native species that help wildlife thrive and rush to the rescue of injured animals.

             They know their obligation when, because of blight or wind damage, they need to take out plants that provide seeds, berries, nectar and vegetation for a variety of critters. The obligation is to replace the food source.

             These people recognize the wrong in harming the heron’s nest or damaging the tortoise’s hole.

             These are good people, who know about the good of trees.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Milkweed for the monarchs

    Milkweed for the monarchs

           A monarch butterfly fluttered past The Islander’s office window to settle on a hibiscus petal.

           Monarchs can be found year-round on Anna Maria Island, yet when I see the butterfly, I still think of spring and summer, because that’s when I saw them as a child in Illinois.

           Sadly, I see fewer monarchs than I did a decade ago, and I’m not alone in this observation.

           Research from the Florida Museum of Natural History, the University of Florida and Hamilton College in New York shows Florida’s monarch butterfly populations dropped 80 percent since 2005.

           The researchers based their study on a 37-year survey of monarch populations — caterpillars and butterflies — in north central Florida. The scientists examined milkweed plants for caterpillars and captured adult butterflies for 37 years — a period spanning more than 140 generations of monarchs.

           Study co-author Jaret Daniels at the museum’s McGuire Center for Lepidoptera summarized the research results: “This study shows the tight connection between monarchs and milkweed and highlights very dramatic losses in abundance in Florida that further confirm the monarch is declining.”

           While Florida hosts monarchs year-round, it also hosts migratory monarchs. Their springtime departure from Mexico to Florida and elsewhere in the southeastern United States is timed to coincide with the growth of milkweed, where the monarchs will lay hundreds of eggs.

           Monarch larvae feed almost exclusively on milkweed — not the tropical milkweed (asclepias curassavica) found in the garden departments of big box stores, but the native milkweed we should find in our yards and alongside roads.

           To maximize their offspring’s chances of survival, the butterflies must time their United States arrival within a three-week window, according to Daniels, who described Florida as a staging ground for the monarch’s recolonization of the East Coast.

           If the species suffers in Florida, it suffers elsewhere.

           The researchers pointed to the shrinking populations of native milkweed as a factor in the monarch’s decline.

           They also pointed to the application of glyphosate, a herbicide used to eliminate weeds, as a factor in the monarch’s decline. Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup, wipes out milkweed.

           The Florida decrease parallels falling numbers in the monarch’s overwintering grounds in Mexico.

           The plight of this pollinator has led some environmental groups to call for protections under the federal Endangered Species Act.

           Others have pressed for a grass-roots response, with a campaign to protect and grow butterfly habitat, particularly by planting herbicide-free milkweed plants needed for the species to continue. 

           About 20 types of milkweed plants are native to the state, according to the University of South Florida’s plant atlas.

           Some species include:

           • Swamp milkweed, asclepias incarnate, which grows best in wet areas in central Florida and southward.

           • Aquatic milkweed, asclepias perennis, found in wet areas in central Florida and northward.

           • Fewflower milkweed, asclepias lanceolata, found in wet areas throughout the state.

           • Butterflyweed, asclepias tuberosa, found throughout the state in dry to semi-dry areas.

           Remember, if there is no milkweed, there are no monarchs.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Parakeets find paradise

    Parakeets find paradise

           Dress up the backyard bird feeder with sunflower seeds and cracked corn — and wait.

           Parakeets just may flock to the feeder if squirrels or other critters don’t get there first.

           The parakeets most likely to visit include the blue-crowned parakeet, the nanday or black-hooded parakeet and the monk, also known as the quaker parrot.

           These birds add color to our island paradise.

           As they fly from a utility wire to tree branches, tourists take notice, halting their footsteps to look up and point out the bright green birds squawking in flight.

           I admit that I stop to watch, too. I’ve even sat through a green light at the Holmes Beach intersection of Gulf Drive and Manatee Avenue, oblivious to blaring horns while watching the parakeets flock to the beach entrance.

           Seen among the palms, the monk, the nanday and the blue-crowned look natural, but none of the parakeets seen in the wild here or elsewhere in Florida are native to the state.

           In fact, none of the parakeets seen in the wild in any U.S. state are native. We had one native parakeet — the Carolina — and drove it to extinction about a century ago. 

           The Carolina Parakeet was found as far north as Wisconsin and as far south as Florida, but, according to the National Audubon Society, the last known wild Carolina was killed in Okeechobee County, Florida, in 1904, and the last captive Carolina died in Cincinnati in February 1918.

           The Carolina suffered the fate of many birds that went extinct in the United States in the 1900s. We cleared its habitat, hunted it for plumage to decorate hats and exterminated it to grow crops.

           So for several decades, there were no parakeets here, according to bird surveys. The Carolina Parakeet was gone and the species we see today didn’t arrive until the 1950s and 1960s, imported from South America as pets and now thriving.

           Today, 56 parakeet species have been observed in the wild in 43 states and about 25 parakeet species are breeding in 23 states, according to a study published earlier this year in the Journal of Ornithology that used information from Audubon’s Christmas Bird Count and the Cornell Lab of Ornithology’s eBird database.

           The monk is one of the more successful non-native parakeets in the United States, breeding in the wild in at least 10 states as early as 1968. 

           On Anna Maria Island, the monk’s population seems to rise and fall, according to the results of the Christmas count.

           In 1988, the earliest year a count was conducted specifically for the island, observers reported five monk parakeets. The numbers reached 28 in 1993, 70 in 1998 and 151 in 1999.

           The highest recorded number for the island was 175 in 2002.

           Research shows that the monk parakeets in the U.S. invasion in the 1960s and a European invasion in the 1980s originated from the same small area, between the south of Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay.

           You’ve heard of snowbirds.

           What about sunbirds?

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Rising sea and coastal living

    Rising sea and coastal living

           The big-wheeled trucks rolled over the Anna Maria Island Bridge.

           Two flatbeds hauling housing lumber and materials crossed the bridge and rolled into Holmes Beach.

           And just minutes earlier I’d turned up the radio to listen to another report on sea level rise, news about climate change slowing the Gulf Stream, causing more rise in Florida.

           The clockwise current brings warm air — and water — from the tropics up the U.S. East Coast, across the Atlantic to northeastern Europe. There, near Greenland, the water cools and turns south, back toward the tropics.

           But the circulation system is ailing, at its weakest in 1,600 years, with about 15% of its strength lost since the 1950s, according to new research.

           And the consensus among scientists is that climate change will further weaken the Gulf Stream, causing colder winters for Northern Europe and more heat and higher sea level rise for Florida.

           When you hear such a report and live here on the coast, surrounded by water, you wonder: How high?

           You ask: When?

           You think: Where?

           As The Islander went to press, the city of Anna Maria and the Center of Anna Maria Island were set to host a forum on sea level rise featuring John Englander, author of “High Tide on Main Street.”

           The forum was to be at the center, 407 Magnolia Ave., Anna Maria, at 6 p.m. Tuesday, Dec. 10, and address the science of sea level rise and potential, practical solutions.

           We know we must reduce our carbon footprint by moving toward zero waste, driving less, conserving water, switching to sustainable energy and eating plant-based diets.

           We also know as a society that we should slow the pace of development on the coasts.

           Yet the pace is on the rise, with the locations at most risk of sea level rise developing faster than safe zones, according to a report produced by Climate Central, a nonprofit science and news organization, in concert with Zillow, an online real estate database.

           Since 2009, in Florida and eight other states, the housing growth rate in coastal flood-risk zones outpaced the growth rates in safer areas.

           “Surging Seas,” another report from Climate Central, also examines vulnerability to sea level rise and coastal flooding at the national, state and local level using projections and historic data.

           The executive summary contains these facts: 2,120 square miles of land lie less than 3 feet above the high tide line in Florida. Some $145 billion in property value and 300,000 homes sit on that land. About 2,555 miles of road, 35 public schools, a power plant and 978 known hazardous waste or materials sites lie on land less than 3 feet above the high tide line.

           Also found in the summary is this assessment: Every inch of sea level rise will be more damaging than the previous inch.

           To get a local outlook, Climate Central provides maps and assessments online at riskfinder.org.

           Type “Holmes Beach” into the search bar and learn that the projection for sea level rise is another 4 feet by 2100, which means an 18% risk of at least one flood exceeding 5 feet by 2030, a 46% risk by midcentury and a 100% risk by 2100.

           Type “Bradenton Beach” into the search bar and learn that the 100-year flood height is 4.9 feet above the high tide line, and the highest observed flood there was at 4 feet in 1985.

           Type “Anna Maria” into a search bar and learn that the city has experienced about 7 inches of sea level rise based on records for the past 67 years.

           I’m more than eager to learn about practical solutions.

           How about you?

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Fall migration intensifies

    Fall migration intensifies

           Even before the first snow of the fall fell up north, the big migration began.

           I attended two parties in October to welcome the first flocks of friends and neighbors arriving from Wisconsin, Illinois, Ohio, New York and other locations already recording below-freezing temps.

           And, also in late October, I trekked through Perico Island’s Neal Preserve and Bradenton Beach’s Leffis Key to welcome another group of travelers — winged migrants, possibly from the same states as my biped pals.

           So, welcome back Dunns and Ristows, Johnsons and Lovejoys.

           And also, welcome orioles, grosbeaks and wood warblers.

           Add to the list blue-gray gnatcatchers, wrens, vireos, thrushes, hawks, eagles and buntings.

           One of the best resources for tracking the fall migration — of birds, not people — is BirdCast, maintained by the University of Oxford and Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Birdcast.info contains live migration maps, showing the intensity of activity across the United States.

           Visitors to the website will find forecasts for nocturnal migration three hours after sunset and updates through the night, about every six hours.

           The information for the BirdCast maps comes from radar, which also provides migration information shared by the National Weather Service. In early October, an NWS station in upstate New York reported the mass movement of songbirds headed our way.

           Some of the birds traveling south will fly over Florida — or stop over in Florida — en route to Central or South America. 

           For others, Florida is their winter destination.

           And a top local spot to look for them is Leffis Key, located at Coquina Bayside and on the Great Florida Birding Trail, a 2,000-mile-long trail consisting of more than 500 locations where the bird habitats are protected. In Manatee, the trail also includes Duette and Emerson Point preserves and Greer Island Beach, but it should be expanded to include Neal and Perico preserves on Perico and Robinson Preserve in west Bradenton.

           At Leffis, the arrival of rose-breasted grosbeaks had local birdwatchers chirping the week of Oct. 28.

           What sighting will have us warbling in early November?

           Maybe a black-and-white warbler.

           Or perhaps the white pelicans will check in.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • For the good of the Gulf’s birds

    For the good of the Gulf’s birds

           After the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded in April 2010, local tourism officials worked to convey to the rest of the world that the oil gushing from the well — for 87 days — didn’t taint Anna Maria Island’s shoreline.

           Islanders also expressed relief that the disaster occurred up north, but we shared common grief over the suffering and agonized over the losses. The worst environmental disaster in U.S. history didn’t occur in sight of our shoreline, but it happened in our Gulf waters.

           The oil spill caused an “ecosystem-level injury” — in the words of the final assessment survey — to the Gulf of Mexico, and bird mortality from the spill was conservatively estimated at 51,600-84,500. Other estimates put bird mortality over 1 million.

           Vulnerable species, such as piping plovers, least terns, Wilson’s plovers and black terns, were heavily oiled and badly injured. Brown pelican populations, too, were devastated — only months after being removed from the endangered species list.

           Today, nearly nine years after the disaster, efforts at recovery continue.

           Earlier this month, the National Audubon Society released its vision for “restoring the Gulf of Mexico for birds and people.”

           Audubon’s vision for restoring coastal habitat to benefit the birds — and people — would make use of some of the $20.8 billion settlement between BP and the U.S. Department of Justice. The 2015 settlement provided for payouts over 15 years.

           Audubon’s proposal would put $1.7 billion into 30 restoration and conservation projects, including work in our region, where some birds rescued in Louisiana after the spill were released.

           One project involves protecting and conserving habitat at the Richard T. Paul Alafia Bank Bird Sanctuary breakwaters in Hillsborough County. The sanctuary is the largest wading bird colony on the west coast of the state, with 5,000 pairs of nesting birds. The largest colony of roseate spoonbills in the state is in the sanctuary.

           Tropical weather systems and freighter ship wakes in Tampa Bay continue to erode the sanctuary’s northern shoreline, but installing more wave attenuation devices can help protect the site, and that’s Audubon’s goal.

           Another effort to protect and conserve habitat involves installing nearshore breakwaters to protect rookery islands in the Tampa Bay region, including one on the Braden River in Manatee County, and several in Pinellas County.

           Regionwide, Audubon’s plans include:

           • Promoting stewardship of bird habitat.

           • Researching the population and distribution of black skimmers.

           • Studying the possible creation of new Gulf islands as bird sanctuaries.

           • Protecting and restoring high marshes.

           “Never before has this amount of funding been dedicated to ecosystem restoration,” says Kara Lankford, Audubon’s director of Gulf Coast Restoration.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Happy campers pitch a tent

    Happy campers pitch a tent

           Bug spray? 

           Check.

           Matches?

           Check.

           Sleeping bags?

           Check.

           At least two times a year, my wife Connie and I pack our hatchback with food staples and supplies and speed off to sleep in the woods amid raccoons, rabbits and other critters common to state parks in southwest Florida. 

           Work schedules allow us to put up the “Gone Camping” notice for about 24 hours, but we pack for a week in the wilderness rather than an overnight in a Florida state park.

           We’re not glampers outfitted with mattresses, solar chandeliers and a tent the size of an island cottage — or rather what used to be the size of an island cottage.

           But we don’t “rough it.”

           We pitch a tent in a camping spot with a water pump, electrical outlets, campfire circle, grill and picnic table and say “hello” to happy campers on both sides of us. 

           A typical trip involves setting up camp, hiking a trail, cooking dinner over an open fire, chatting with other campers, roasting marshmallows, stargazing, playing poker and then drifting off to sleep in the tent.

           We’re miserable campers when the bugs swarm or a thunderstorm hits, but our bad trips have been few.

           We’re the happiest of campers when we get treated to a wildlife encounter.

           On an outing to Little Manatee River State Park June 1, a hawk watched us set up camp. We saw two deer, an armadillo, three gopher tortoises, four pileated woodpeckers and an owl. I spotted a red-headed woodpecker — an addition to my birder’s lifelist. And we listened to a whip-poor-will as darkness fell.

           Only twice have we been frightened in a Florida campground — once by a growl outside the tent at Oscar Sherer State Park, which turned out to be from a rabbit; and once by a scurrying mole, also at Oscar Sherer, located off the Tamiami Trail near Osprey and one of our favorite destinations.

           Our first camping trip in Florida was at Oscar Sherer, where we woke up to six pileated woodpeckers working on the trees above our tent.

           I’d camp more often if opportunities existed even closer to home than the 40-plus-minute drive to Little Manatee River or the hour-long drive to Myakka River State Park.

           But public camping is limited in west Bradenton to group outings at Robinson Preserve and prohibited on Anna Maria Island, with exceptions for events such as the sleepover at Coquina Beach for a now-defunct fundraiser.

           Leffis Key at Coquina Beach Bayside would be an ideal spot. Perico and Neal preserves on Perico Island also would be ideal for camping, even if opportunities were limited to a few weekends a year.

           So how do we make for more happy campers?

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Mapping a way into nature

    Mapping a way into nature

           For as long as I can remember, I’ve loved maps.

           I remember a chain of diners in Illinois that set the tables with paper placemats showing Route 66. My pancakes would go cold while I traced the black line that began at a dot in Chicago and ended at a dot in Santa Monica, California.

           Maps drive daydreams, stir fantasies, push planning and encourage exploration.

           Maps helped Americans travel 2,448 miles across the western half of the United States on Route 66 and they help us on our journey from Anna Maria’s Bean Point to Bradenton Beach’s Coquina Beach.

           “Where is Tuna Street?” The Islander’s publisher asks in the paper’s table of contents whenever the street map is in print.

           The question refers readers to the map printed across the newspaper’s center spread, and I suspect more than a few people have turned to the map to find Tuna Street at A2 and then looked at the street names in the Anna Maria neighborhood.

           I turn and find Spruce.

           And Cypress.

           Coconut isn’t far.

           Are there coconut trees on Coconut?

           Maps, with their street listings, place names and wayfinding tools, lead us to think about nature and anything that leads us to think about nature is good for the environment.

           Noted at the top of The Islander map — in the A1 corner — is Bean Point. I see from the map that Bean Point is a must-visit destination, where I can look west from Bean Point to the Gulf of Mexico and look east across Tampa Bay.

           The map doesn’t show what’s north of Bean Point, but a map enthusiast can imagine.

           And south of Bean Point? An explorer will find Anna Maria’s “garden district,” with streets named for the rose, poinsettia, gladiolus and hibiscus.

           Following the map from Anna Maria into Holmes Beach, I see streets named Sunrise and Peacock and, of course, Manatee Avenue, which makes me think of a parade of sea cows. 

           On the bayside north of Manatee Avenue, the map shows Harbor Lane, Harbor Drive and Palm Harbor, and I’m reminded to ask at the newspaper office if a harbor ever existed at the location.

           The map — with Gulf Drive, Bayview and Bay Drive — indicates that when in Bradenton Beach, one is never far from the Gulf or the bay.

           Leffis Key Nature Park, the name printed in green type, entices.

           Coquina Public Beach beckons.

           And “bridge to Longboat Key” creates some mystery.

           Where will you go today?

           Take your newspaper, check the MCAT app and hop on a trolley to adventure.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • No butts left behind

    No butts left behind

           A black-and-white poster of a man — his face wrinkled, his hair greasy, his eyes dull — adorned the wall of the principal’s office in my elementary school in the mid-1970s.

           “Smoking is very glamorous,” read the print on the American Cancer Society PSA depicting a decidedly unglamorous guy. The message was not lost on 10-year-old kids who wouldn’t worry about wrinkles for 40 years but recognized hideous.

           Smoking isn’t glamorous; it’s deadly, we learned.

           Two other posters displayed in the office depicted cartoon owls instructing kids to “give a hoot, don’t pollute” and “don’t be a dirty bird.”

           For good reason, the anti-litter posters shared a wall with the anti-smoking poster. 

           On Anna Maria Island, we know that those who clean up our beaches find more discarded cigarette butts than any other type of litter.

           The trend holds nationally and internationally, according to data from the nonprofit Ocean Conservancy.

           Tobacco litter presents a threat to wildlife, as birds, fish and marine animals can mistake cigarettes — which contain toxins, nicotine, carcinogens — for food and ingest the butts.

           The plastic cellulose acetate composition of cigarette filters actually acts as a conduit for the heavy metals in tobacco products, including arsenic, manganese, cadmium and lead.

           And the toxins in tobacco litter leach into water — a cigarette butt dropped into a liter of water can kill half the lab minnows exposed to the solution in 48 hours.

           To address the problems, anti-litter groups, such as Keep America Beautiful, partner with local governments to place “Bin the Butt” ashtrays near beaches, as well as distribute pocket ashtrays.

           Surveys show some success with such efforts, but some environmental groups and politicians would go beyond making ashtrays available at public beaches to banning smoking at public beaches.

           Maine, Hawaii and New Jersey have imposed restrictions on beach smoking, as have some other coastal communities.

           For the 2019 session, state Sen. Joe Gruters, R-Sarasota, introduced a bill that would have prohibited smoking tobacco on public beaches. The measure, which died in committee, would have authorized law enforcement to issue a civil citation for smoking and set a maximum penalty of $25.

           Expecting similar legislation to be sponsored in 2020, the environmental group ManaSota-88 in June issued a statement endorsing a beach smoking ban: “A ban on smoking on the public beaches would help reduce the litter from cigarette butts, reduce the health risks associated with second-hand smoke and promote a healthy lifestyle.”

           The statement said ManaSota-88 “fully supports local and state efforts to reduce the irresponsible disposal of cigarette butts on public beaches.”

           Stephen P. Leatherman also has endorsed a ban. 

           If you don’t recognize the name, maybe you know of Leatherman as “Dr. Beach,” who on Memorial Day weekends since 1991, has issued a list of top beaches.

           Leatherman is based in Florida and many of his lists included Sunshine State beaches, but might that change?

           He uses 50 criteria to evaluate beaches, and he acknowledged this year in an op-ed that he assigns extra credit for beaches where smoking is banned.

           “Nothing restores the body and soul like a beach vacation,” Leatherman wrote. And then he stated a but about butts: “But sitting down on the sand and finding a nasty cigarette butt touching my hand spoils the whole experience.”

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Producing public produce

    Producing public produce

           The wagons, hitches and 4H volunteers arrive May 19 to the Bradenton Area Convention Center in Palmetto.

           No, the rodeo isn’t in town.

           Neither is the county fair.

           The Manatee Rare Fruit Tree Sale, presented by the Manatee Rare Fruit Council, takes place 10 a.m.-4 p.m. at the center, 1 Haben Blvd.

           The first year I attended, I learned to bring cash.

           I also learned to clear out my car trunk, prepare to get hands dirty, dress to get soil smeared on my knees and expect to be overwhelmed by an abundance of plants — and an abundance of people seeking to buy them.

           One more lesson from that first year at the Manatee Rare Fruit Tree Sale — don’t take “rare” literally. Vendors will be offering more than 5,000 plants, some that could be characterized as rare or unusual, but many will be like the citrus trees you’ve coveted in your neighbor’s backyard.

           Plants and trees on the market’s list include apple, avocado, banana, blackberry, blueberry, cashew, coconut, fig, grape, jackfruit, lychee, mango, mulberry, papaya, passion fruit, pineapple, plantain, peach, pear, plum, raspberry and star fruit, as well as lemon, lime, key lime, grapefruit and orange.

           My first spree at the fruit tree sale, I returned to Anna Maria Island with two knee-high lemon trees for my side yard and a third lemon tree for my neighbor’s yard. 

           I considered bringing back a citrus tree to donate for the right-of-way near the southern border to Anna Maria, where a resident had called out the sheriff’s office because two kids took oranges from her yard.

           I understand the low-hanging fruit belonged to the homeowner and was not for the kids’ taking, but the complaint got me thinking about public plantings on the island, specifically food-producing trees.

           Near my sister’s home in northern Illinois, mulberry, apple, pear and cherry trees line the trail of a county preserve. In the summer, when I visit, we take evening walks and sample whatever’s in season.

           In the alley behind my former apartment on Chicago’s North Side, raspberry bushes produce fruit for anyone to pick.

           In southeastern Wisconsin, where I reported environmental stories for a decade, public park orchards produce sweet, natural treats.

           In Anna Maria, I know beachgoers who munch on a sea grape or two as they follow an access path near Coconut Avenue to the Gulf.

           But what if the island featured an oasis of fruit- and nut-bearing trees in its parks or the setbacks along pedestrian paths, avenues and similar locations?

           I mentioned the concept to garden enthusiasts on Anna Maria Island, who endorsed the idea but wondered who would care for the public trees. I replied, we the people could care for the trees.

           Friends showed interest but worried fruit trees would draw creepy crawly critters. I replied that fruit trees already grow on the island, but they are beyond the public’s reach.

           A few fretted over people taking more than they could eat or more than their share. I heard: “People will abuse the system.” “What if people take it and sell it?” “How much fruit per person?”  I replied that they can take until they have their fill, of course.

           But the concept has yet to take root.

           So May 19, I’ll look for an olive tree for my patio and maybe a star fruit for a neighbor.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Signing up to clean up

    Signing up to clean up

           But why? the kid asked.

           Because you’re the superhero and someone else is the villain, a woman replied to the child’s question about why they were picking up someone else’s litter at the Kingfish Boat Ramp in Holmes Beach.

           Her answer made me want to applaud.

           Why should we clean up messes made by other people?

           Because we are superheroes of the environment and they are villains.

           You can join the forces of good to fight the litterbugs and polluters Saturday, Sept. 21, when the International Coastal Cleanup takes place.

           The global effort began in 1986, led by the nonprofit Ocean Conservancy in collaboration with many anti-litter groups. 

           Locally, Keep Manatee Beautiful coordinates the cleanup, which will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until about noon, with registration at three island locations: Anna Maria City Hall at 10005 Gulf Drive, the Kingfish Boat Ramp on Manatee Avenue west of the Anna Maria Island Bridge in Holmes Beach and Coquina Beach near the island trolley turnaround.

           Registration also will take place in Cortez, at the Florida Institute for Saltwater Heritage Preserve, 11601 Cortez Road W.

           “Taking part in a cleanup is often an eye-opening moment for volunteers that leads to year-round and lifelong stewardship,” said Allison Schutes, who directs the cleanup campaign for the Ocean Conservancy.

           In 2018, more than a million volunteers in more than 120 countries collected 23.3 million pounds of trash, mostly from beaches and waterways, but also from roadsides.

           Volunteers found some odd items — a chandelier, a garage door, a cash register, as well as wedding dresses, mattresses and artificial Christmas trees.

           A washing machine might seem like an oddity to find discarded on the shore, but the OC reported that volunteers collected more than 16,000 appliances during the International Coastal Cleanup in 2018.

           Volunteers also picked up about 5.7 million cigarette butts, 3.7 million food wrappers, 3.7 million plastic straws, 2 million pieces of plastic cutlery and about 1.8 million plastic beverage bottles.

           Looking at the statistics, villains outnumber superheroes, but that’s how epic battles begin.

           Encouraging participation in the Sept. 21 cleanup, Ocean Conservancy CEO Janis Searles Jones said in a news release, “We are gearing up for another million-strong volunteers showing up this year.

           “Together, we can make a difference — for our community, for our coasts and for our ocean.”

           Avengers assemble.

    Get involved

           For more information about the Ocean Conservancy and its International Coastal Cleanup, go online to signuptocleanup.org. 

           For more information about the local cleanup and Keep Manatee Beautiful, call 941-795-8272 or email keep@manateebeautiful.com.

    Did you know?

           Since the inception of the International Coastal Cleanup in 1986, more than 15 million volunteers have collected about 315 million pounds of trash from beaches and waterways.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Spinning wheels, spinning policy

    Spinning wheels, spinning policy

           I took a Spin scooter for a spin on a Sunday in July.

           I had a heck of a good time.

           And, I promise I posed no menace to society.

           I’d watched news reports on Tampa’s pilot program for shared electric scooters that indicated abandoned electric scooters were piling up on Tampa sidewalks, that renters were leaving their rides on roadways and riders were crashing into pedestrians and racing on interstates.

           I’d also read reports from other cities in Florida and elsewhere in the United States, under headlines assigning to e-scooters the ability to act, to invade campuses and threaten neighborhoods.

           The reports conveyed a sense that e-scooter programs cause serious casualties and calamity.

           But I still wanted to test drive an e-scooter.

           And, in an afternoon scooting around the Tampa Heights neighborhood, I saw only one mishap — when the driver of a truck failed to brake at a stop sign before turning right, causing a scooter rider to jump and tumble.

           When I tried to ride a scooter onto the Tampa Riverwalk, a restricted zone, I hit a geofence. A warning sounded, my scooter powered down and I turned around.

           As for abandoned scooters, I saw a few parked on sidewalks, possibly because their operators didn’t want to deposit another $10 in their app accounts to ride a few more minutes.

           Tampa introduced its yearlong pilot program in collaboration with four vendors — Spin, Bird, Lime and Jump — and by my account, it seems to be working.

           I was a joy rider, but the e-scooters also fill a transportation niche.

           The scooters can go about 15-20 mph and travel 20 miles on a single charge, providing a way for people to travel short distances, replacing short automobile rides to reduce traffic levels, improve mobility and reduce emissions.

           Transit riders use the e-scooters to meet “last-mile” needs — to go the distance between a bus stop and a destination. Imagine riding an e-scooter from the Key Royale Club to the trolley stop at Key Royale and Marina drives, catching the trolley to the Anna Maria City Pier and then picking up another scooter to ride the short distance to our favorite sushi restaurant.

           Maybe scooter providers need to educate more people on rules and regulations, and perhaps some policies in the test cities need revising, but we’re still revising rules and educating people about driving automobiles 121 years after the debut of the Model T. We’re not advocating a ban on automobiles because people park in no-parking areas.

           So maybe the leaders in the island cities — including officials in Holmes Beach — should think about how to make shared scooter programs work for the community, rather than enact prohibitions.

           Enacting a moratorium to figure out how best to implement a program, I understand.

           But I don’t understand prohibiting a type of transportation that could reduce the number of automobiles on roads and polluting our air.

    Sharing a scooter

           To rent a shared scooter, download a vendor’s app to a smartphone and create an account.

           Use the app to scan a QR code on the scooter, which unlocks and activates the scooter.

           In Tampa, scooter operators must be 16 years or older and have either a driver’s license or permit.

           Riders must obey traffic laws, including yielding the right of way to a pedestrian.

           And riders should park courteously by returning scooters to designated corrals — designated by striping on pavement — and leaving them upright on sidewalks.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Backyard birders to aid scientists

    Backyard birders to aid scientists

           Six blue jays hopped from branch to branch in a pine tree on Magnolia Avenue near the beach.

           Overhead, three crows circled.

           Unseen, a cardinal sang a cheery tune.

           Why might scientists care about these observations made on a recent Saturday morning in Anna Maria?

           Because the numbers alone might raise questions about the strength of a species, changes in habitat and levels of pollution.

           Consider how observations helped Rachel Carson, in 1962’s  “Silent Spring” — one of the most influential books in the modern environmental movement — demonstrate the disastrous environmental effects of pesticides in the 1950s and 1960s.

           A passage in the chapter titled “No Birds Sing” reports a wealth of bird life in a community and then, after several years of spraying DDT on trees, “the town is almost devoid of robins and starlings; chickadees have not been on my shelf for two years, and this year the cardinals are gone, too.”

           The chapter also includes an observation from a man whose picture window “used to frame a scene splashed with the red of 40 or 50 cardinals and crowded with other species,” but, after pesticide spraying, the man seldom saw more than two birds.

           We learn from such observations and scientists learn from such observations, as well as their own studies.

           What if I see six blue jays many mornings and then they disappear?

           What if the population of three crows grows to 300 crows?

           What if I hear one cardinal, but I used to hear a dozen?

           What if one morning I see an ivory-billed woodpecker and prove the bird is not extinct — or no longer extinct?

           With this enthusiasm, I approach the global Great Backyard Bird Count, which will be conducted Feb. 15-18. Birders of all ages and skills participate in the four-day annual happening that I consider a Valentine’s Day event for nature lovers.

           Volunteers will count the birds they see for at least 15 minutes on one or more days of the count and then enter their checklists at birdcount.org.

           During the 2018 count, birdwatchers from more than 100 countries submitted more than 180,000 bird checklists, reporting a record 6,456 species – more than half the known bird species in the world.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Beachgoing for the birds

    Beachgoing for the birds

           From time to time, especially in the spring and summer, I see a kid race across the beach, hoping to send the birds on the sand into flight.

           And there, crouched on the shore, to capture the moment the birds take flight, I’ll see an adult with a camera.

           Smile. You’ve encouraged a kid to commit a crime.

           I’m not surprised when the photographs appear on social media, where their owners can narrow their audiences. But I’m always amazed when someone submits a photograph of a kid chasing shorebirds for publication in the newspaper.

           Should the image run on the “cops and court” page?

           I think readers would answer “yes” if the photograph depicted an adult galloping through a group of gulls or especially stomping through a nesting colony of black skimmers.

           Four years ago, a rampage up the shoreline by a man and a woman on a “high-powered” vehicle resulted in the death of two black skimmer chicks and damage to five sea turtle nests. The unsolved crime sparked outrage among islanders, evidenced by calls for a police investigation and demands for a tough prosecution if an arrest occurred.

           But I’ve seen adults stand by as children sprayed water at banded red knots, tossed bread at royal terns and kicked buckets toward snowy plovers.

           So we must convince adults to be better stewards before they can teach their kids to be bird-friendly.

           Some recommendations and reminders from Audubon Florida and other bird-friendly nonprofits:

           • Keep a distance from shorebird habitat. Nesting areas often are posted with signs during the breeding season, but not all sites get posted. And, of course, birds don’t observe our artificial borders.

           • Do not get close to chicks or eggs. A disturbance can cause an adult bird to abandon a chick or a nest, leaving the chick or eggs vulnerable to predators and the sun.

           • Pets, prohibited on island beaches, can wreak havoc on shorebird colonies in seconds. Dogs don’t need to chase birds for birds to perceive them as predators.

           • Take trash away from the beach. Litter can contain toxic or hazardous materials. Also, trash attracts predators.

           • Dispose of fishing line. Birds get entangled in loose lines, causing injury and even death. Just two weeks ago, I cut a line hanging a dead egret from an Australian pine tree along the edge of Bimini Bay.

           • Avoid giving birds people food, including bread, which can harm their digestive system, draw predators and create a reliance on humans.

           • Avoid scaring birds — accidentally or intentionally.

           Noisy activity, such as setting off firecrackers, or harassment, such as chasing birds, jeopardizes their health.

           Shorebirds feed under certain tidal conditions and disturbing them prevents rest and feeding, leading to reduced reproduction and survival rates.

           So be a good egg, and let the birds be birds.

    Did you know?

           State and federal laws protect the birds on island beaches, whether they are common crows or endangered plovers.

           The most protective laws include the U.S. Endangered Species Act and the U.S. Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which protect birds against harm and harassment.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Wild about wild turkeys

    Wild about wild turkeys

           The turkey stood on the grass, looking up in the drizzling rain.

           I stood on my patio, watching and wondering and wowed.

           What’s a turkey doing in west Manatee County?

           I didn’t expect another sighting of the bird, but I now see the wild turkey almost daily.

           The turkey is a “she” now, not an “it” — known by a variety of names depending on which neighbor is commenting on her beauty and mystique.

           She’s known as Harriet, Gertrude, Gladys, Mary and Taystee.

           And she’s been living in the neighborhood for months, apparently staying healthy on the nuts and berries she forages from our bountiful landscape and some snacks from our kind neighbors.

           When I see her, I’m reminded of a pivotal experience that brought me to Florida. I’d flown from Chicago to Fort Myers for job interviews and, right outside the airport doors, I saw wild pigs on the runways.

           Until that day, the only free “wild” animals I’d seen were squirrels, gophers, deer, birds, lake fish and the occasional rat in the Chicago subway.

           Each new wildlife encounter since my move to Florida in 2005 has felt memorable, sometimes monumental, as was the case several years ago, when one morning, my wife Connie and I came across wild turkeys in Myakka River State Park.

           We were on a road near the cabins built of palm tree trunks in the 1930s by the Civilian Conservation Corps when we saw the turkeys, maybe six of them, including young birds.

           For those who’ve only seen sad, lethargic turkeys in petting zoos, I’ll point out: Turkeys are fast, especially the lean, leggy females.

           At the park ranger’s office in Myakka, we learned that habitat destruction has threatened Florida’s wild turkey population and driven the birds from their natural habitat.

           Perhaps that’s how Harriet landed in West Manatee.

           Her residency is a question we can’t answer.

           We also learned from the park ranger that wild turkeys are social animals, form communal groups and flock together.

           So Harriet’s solitude also presents a question.

           Will I perhaps see her in the future in the rain with tom turkey or a rafter of chicks?

           Next week: Yes, turkeys can fly. And hurricanes can move them on their way.

    This column was published in The Islander newspaper

    Archives for The Islander are online here.

  • Hemp happenings: Industry to cultivate support during Hemp History Week in June

    More than 250 hemp happenings take place in early June, when Hemp History Week arrives.

    The campaign — set for June 4–10 — is coordinated by the Hemp Industries Association and Vote Hemp. HIA is a nonprofit trade group representing hemp companies, researchers, farmers and supporters. Vote Hemp is a nonprofit advocacy group.

    Hemp History Week is an industrywide effort sponsored by brands such as Dr. Bronner’s, Manitoba Harvest, Nature’s Path Organic, Nutiva, Pacific Foods and Plus+ CBD Oil.

    A focus will be on lobbying in Washington, D.C., and at state capitols, but some 250 other grass-roots events also are planned — plantings, markets, film screenings and more.

    Last year, more than 25,000 acres of hemp were planted and harvested in the United States. That’s a record in the few years since passage of the 2014 Farm Bill, which has resulted in 34 states lifting a ban on industrial hemp farming at the state level.

    States that legalized industrial hemp farming — per provision Sec. 7606 of the Farm Bill — include Wisconsin, as well as Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming.

    Still, federal law prohibits commercial industrial hemp cultivation. And challenges for the industry include:

    • Inability of hemp farmers to obtain crop insurance and financing.

    • Difficulties involved with sourcing certified hemp seed.

    • Lack of adequate processing infrastructure in the United States for raw hemp materials.

    • Government interference with the interstate commerce of U.S.-grown and manufactured hemp products.

    • Misregulation of CBD products.

    Organizers of Hemp History Week plan to lobby to change state and federal laws, expose the depth of the industry’s roots in the United States and build awareness to the health, economic, technological and sustainability benefits of hemp.

    Celebrities and wellness experts onboard for the campaign include Dr. Andrew Weil, Alicia Silverstone, Phil Lempert, Ashley Koff R.D., Brendan Brazier, Elizabeth Kucinich, Ziggy Marley, Alexandra Jamieson, Jason Mraz, Dar Williams, Michael Franti, John Salley, Doug Fine and Ozomatli.

    With months still to go before Hemp History Week, organizers of the campaign in mid-February released a new video, “Deep Roots,” which was filmed at the Rodale Institute Experimental Farm in Pennsylvania.

    The video explores the research on cultivating hemp in a regenerative organic no-till agriculture model. In an interview, Rodale farm manager Ross Duffield talks about how industrial hemp could play a key role in rejuvenating the soil and economic health of U.S. farmlands. Also, research technician Tara Caton discusses the attraction pollinators demonstrate toward hemp.

    Note: This story originally published in the Wisconsin Gazette.

  • Study: Trump’s border wall threatens 93 species

    President Donald Trump’s planned border wall threatens 93 species, including jaguars, ocelots, Mexican gray wolves and cactus ferruginous pygmy owls, according to a new study by the Center for Biological Diversity.

    The study also found 25 threatened or endangered species have been designated “critical habitat” on the border, including more than 2 million acres within 50 miles of the border.

    “Trump’s border wall is a disaster for people and wildlife alike,” said Noah Greenwald, endangered species director at the center. “It could drive magnificent species like the jaguar and ocelot to extinction in the United States.”

    The study identified threatened, endangered and “candidate” species — those being considered for protection — that have ranges near or crossing the border.

    These include:

    • 57 endangered species.

    • 24 threatened species.

    • 10 species under consideration for protection.

    • 2 species of concern — golden and bald eagles.

    Construction of the 1,200-mile wall — along with related infrastructure and enforcement — would have far-reaching consequences for wildlife, including cutting off migration corridors, reducing genetic diversity, destroying habitat, and adding vehicles, noise and lights to vast stretches of the wild borderlands.

    “The border wall won’t be effective at stopping people seeking a better life from getting to this country, but it will destroy habitat and divide wildlife populations,” Greenwald said in a news release. “Building a wall across the entirety of the border would cause massive damage to one of the most biologically diverse regions in North America and would be a boondoggle of the highest order.”

    The sections of border wall already built have had a range of negative effects on wildlife, including direct destruction of thousands of acres of habitat, indirect impacts from noise and light pollution, and division of cross-border wildlife populations like bighorn sheep and jaguars.

    The border wall would cut through the Cabeza Prieta, Buenos Aires and several other national wildlife refuges, along with Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Big Bend National Park and many other natural areas.

    Last month, the center and U.S. Rep. Raúl M. Grijalva, D-Ariz., sued the Trump administration over the proposed border wall and other border security measures.

    The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, is the first targeting the administration’s plan to vastly expand and militarize the U.S.-Mexico border.

    Note: This story originally published in the Wisconsin Gazette.

  • ‘Round up’ of losses for Big Chem as herbicides and pesticides come under scrutiny

    A federal appeals court ruled in August that the Environmental Protection Agency must ban a widely used organophosphate pesticide.

    The appellate court in the 9th Circuit ordered the federal agency to finalize its proposed ban on chlorpyrifos based on findings that the pesticide is unsafe for public health — and particularly harmful to children and farmworkers.

    “The court ended EPA’s shameful actions that have exposed children and farmworkers to this poison for decades,” Earthjustice attorney Marisa Ordonia said. “Finally, our fields, fruits and vegetables will be chlorpyrifos-free.”

    Chlorpyrifos — first developed by the Nazis for chemical warfare and repurposed for agriculture — is a pesticide that can damage the developing brains of children. Prenatal and early life exposure is linked to lower birth weight and neurodevelopmental harms, including reduced IQ, loss of working memory, attention disorders and delayed motor development.

    The pesticide is used on apples, oranges, broccoli and dozens of other crops, but has been banned from household use for about two decades.

    A year ago, the Trump administration reversed the EPA proposal to ban chlorpyrifos after Scott Pruit, who was in charge of the EPA, met with the head of Dow Chemical, the largest manufacturer of the compound.

    Sindy Benavides, the chief executive officer at the League of United Latin American Citizens, said, “For years, corporations like Dow were able to hijack our government to put profit before people. But … the court sided with reason. Children and farmworkers have the right to live and work without risk of poisonings.”

    Rounding up a loss

    In another legal dispute, this one over the herbicide Roundup, a San Francisco jury awarded $289 million to a former school groundskeeper, Dewayne Johnson, who said Monsanto’s Roundup left him dying of cancer.

    Johnson’s complaint said heavy contact with Roundup — the active ingredient in the product is glyphosate — caused his non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

    A state superior court jury agreed, finding that Monsanto should have provided a label warning of the potential health hazard.

    Johnson’s attorney, Brent Wisner, also has filed a case in Wisconsin. He said, “A unanimous jury in San Francisco has told Monsanto: ‘Enough. You did something wrong and now you have to pay,’ There’s 4,000 other cases filed around the United States and there are countless thousands of other people out there who are suffering from cancer because Monsanto didn’t give them a choice. We now have a way forward.’”

    Monsanto spokesman Scott Partridge said the company would appeal, according to The Associated Press. Partridge noted that scientific studies and two government agencies concluded that Roundup does not cause cancer.

    Across the border

    Also in August, the Canadian government announced plans to phase out all outdoor agricultural uses of bee-killing neonicotinoid pesticides by 2021.

    Previously, the European Union voted to ban the use of those pesticides on outdoor crops.

    In the United States, however, the EPA has not taken such action despite receiving more than 6 million public comments urging a ban on the class of pesticides.

    Not the breakfast of champions

    Lab tests commissioned by the Environmental Working Group headquartered in Washington, D.C., found that favorite oat cereals, oatmeal, granola and snack bars contain glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup.

    Glyphosate is a herbicide linked to cancer by California state scientists and the World Health Organization. It was found in all but two of 45 samples of products made with conventionally grown oats. About one-third of 16 samples made with organically grown oats also contained glyphosate, but with levels well below EWG’s health benchmark. For more, go online to ewg.org.

    Note: This story originally published in the Wisconsin Gazette.

  • Hundreds of native bee species headed toward extinction

    Hundreds of native bee species headed toward extinction

    An analysis of the status of bees native to North America and Hawaii finds many species in decline, and nearly one in four are at risk of extinction.

    “It’s a quiet but staggering crisis unfolding right under our noses,” said Kelsey Kopec, a pollinator researcher with the Center for Biological Diversity and the author of the study “Pollinators in Peril.”

    The decline of the European honeybee has generated a lot of buzz in recent years, but native bee species also are in trouble due to habit destruction, pesticide use, climate change, urbanization and agricultural intensification, according to the CBD.

    “Pollinators in Peril” reviewed information for all 4,337 North American and Hawaiian native bee species and found sufficient data to assess the status of 1,437.

    More than half of these species — 749 — are in decline, including 347 imperiled species.

    “The evidence is overwhelming that hundreds of native bees we depend on for ecosystem stability, as well as pollination worth billions of dollars, are spiraling toward extinction,” Kopec said.

    CBD dedicated a year to the analysis, which involved reviewing the conservation status of species set by state and federal governments and established by independent research.

    These native bees, unlike the European honeybees, are mostly solitary, ground-nesting insects that collect from pollen, nectar, leaves and petals.

    The report highlights several imperiled native bees:

    • Sunflower leafcutting bee. The large bee used to be seen among sunflowers on the Great Plains, but is in steep decline and rarely seen.
    • Wild sweet potato bee. The bee, which has a three-lobed snout, was once common in much of the East, but it is now “dangerously imperiled.”
    • Macropis cuckoo bee. The bee, which invades the nests of other bee species to lay eggs, was common across the central and eastern United States but is now endangered.

    Areas where native bees have suffered most in the United States are California’s Central Valley and the Midwest’s Corn Belt.

    The CBD report builds on other studies showing a global decline of bees and other insect pollinators. A United Nations group in 2015 reported declines for 37 percent of bee species. The report also said 9 percent of bee and butterfly populations face extinction.

    Milkweed for monarchs

    The Natural Resources Foundation of Wisconsin has partnered with the Monarch Joint Venture to protect a spring tradition and a threatened species.

    Each spring, monarch butterflies return from winters in Mexico to Wisconsin and other northern locations to breed and lay eggs.

    But for the past two decades, habitat loss, pesticide use, climate change and other threats have caused the monarch population to decline by more than 70 percent.

    NRFW announced recently it is working with about 50 other partners to conserve, protect and promote the monarch. It plans to coordinate educational programs and provide grants for monarch conservation and habitat restoration in Wisconsin.

    “Habitat in Wisconsin is a critical link in the monarch life cycle,” said Caitlin Williamson, director of conservation programs at NRFW. “So we believe it is our responsibility to do what we can to restore habitat and educate people in Wisconsin on how they can help.”

    Note: This story originally published in the Wisconsin Gazette.

  • Birding for bigger budgets: Wisconsin birdathon benefits conservation programs

    Those who venture into the woods on a weekend in May might spot an “Old Coot” or a “Lower Chippewa River Titmouseketeer.” These are not new species to add to the Sibley Guide to Birds, but rather team players in the Great Wisconsin Birdathon, an annual event that brings hundreds of birders outdoors for spring scoping and raises money for conservation programs in the state.

    The slogan: see a bird, save a bird.

    The goal is to raise $70,000, according to the Natural Resources Foundation of Wisconsin and the Wisconsin Bird Conservation Initiative.

    Birders — there are no restrictions on experience levels — join a team or create a team online and then find sponsors to pledge to donate for each species a team sees during 24 hours.

    “It’s like a walkathon but with birds instead of miles,” says Diane Packett, whose role as birdathon coordinator is to manage the website, recruit participants and help as many as 100 teams get set up to raise money and count birds.

    Some teams got out as early as April 15, but the event continues through June 15.

    Among the participants are eight teams of hotshot birders to raise $30,000:

    • Lake Superior eBirders in Ashland and Bayfield counties, who last year counted 161 species.
    • Madison Green Team of Dane County, who travel by bike, foot and kayak in search of birds at the UW Arboretum, Dunn’s Marsh, along the Capital City Bike Trail, in the Nine-Springs Wetlands and elsewhere.
    • Cutright’s Old Coots, whose territory includes Ozaukee, Sheboygan, Fond du Lac and Dodge counties and who participate in honor of Wisconsin Conservation Hall of Fame member Noel Cutright.

    Other celebrated teams include Curlew & Screech representing Columbia, Dane, Iowa, Sauk, Richland, Grant and Crawford counties; Secretary Birds of Door County and Green Bay; WSO Tessen Team of the Green Lake region; MotMotley Crew of Dodge County and the Titmouseketeers of Eau Claire, Dunn and Buffalo counties.

    “The signature teams include the state’s most serious birders, but the Great Wisconsin Birdathon can be great fun for everyone, no matter what skill level,” says Ruth Oppedahl, executive director of the NRFW. “Birding in your backyard for just a few hours is a wonderful way to learn about Wisconsin’s birds, while also taking action to help conserve them.”

    Packett says, “You can make the birdathon whatever you want. We have someone who does the birdathon from his backyard. Some people spend half a day. Some people start at midnight and drive around the state.”

    Students also get involved, including a grade-school class that identifies species on a neighborhood walk.

    “A lot of people think it is a great big species competition,” said Packett. “It can be. But it doesn’t have to be.”

    The birdathon benefits the Bird Protection Fund, which supports the Wisconsin Breeding Bird Atlas II, Osa Conservation and the recovery of whooping cranes and the Kirtland’s warbler.

    Get involved

    The Great Wisconsin Birdathon continues through June 15, a partnership between the Natural Resources Foundation of Wisconsin and the Wisconsin Bird Conservation Initiative. To create or join a team or pledge to a team, visit wibirdathon.org.

  • Growing hemp, seeding a market for farmers and consumers

    “Hemp for victory” once was a rallying cry in the United States, back when Wisconsin dominated the hemp industry.

    The market for the 12-foot-tall plants was strong a century ago and reached its height during World War II, when Wisconsin led the nation in producing hemp for rope and twine. Growers in Fond du Lac, Green Lake, Dodge and Racine counties supplied the crop, and a mill owner in Waupon held the title of “America’s Hemp King.”

    What’s left of the glory?

    The cultivation of hemp in Wisconsin slowed dramatically with the development of synthetic fiber, but its death knell came in 1970. That’s when the federal government classified any amount of THC — a chemical compound found in both hemp and pot — as an illegal substance, thus killing the hemp industry. But hemp may soon make a comeback.

    FEDERAL FARM BILL

    The Agricultural Act of 2014, which President Barack Obama signed Feb. 7, 2014, contained a so-called “Hemp Amendment,” which allows states to work with higher-education research institutions to create programs for the growth, cultivation and marketing of industrial hemp. With the amendment, the federal government created a definition of industrial hemp so that it would not be confused with its cousin, marijuana.

    To capitalize on the Hemp Amendment, a state’s statutes must allow for hemp farming.

    Kentucky has become a leader on that front. Also, some farmers in Colorado started harvesting hemp in 2013, followed a year later by farmers in Vermont and then farmers in Oregon last winter.

    North Carolina is one of the most recent states to join the movement, enacting a law in October that says, “It is in the best interest of the citizens … to promote and encourage the development of an industrial hemp industry in the state in order to expand employment, promote economic activity and provide opportunities to small farmers for an environmentally sustainable and profitable use of crop lands that might otherwise be lost to agricultural production.”

    However, Wisconsin is not a hemp player.

    Not yet, anyway.

    MOVEMENT IN WISCONSIN

    It’s unlikely the state will produce another hemp king or queen, but Wisconsin could become a significant grower of the potentially big-money crop.

    “The 2014 Farm Bill gave states the authority to begin the process of legalizing industrial hemp,” said Wisconsin Rep. Dave Considine, a Democrat from Baraboo. “Now we’re looking to get something passed and get something going. … We’re vastly behind other states in the Midwest.”

    In the 2015–16 session, Considine introduced a bill to create a research-based hemp farming program in Wisconsin. The bill died in committee, but he plans to reintroduce the legislation in the next session.

    “A lot of people know of industrial hemp as a source of fiber, but that is not all by any means,” Considine said. “For one, it is an extremely popular source of Omega-3. It’s an amazing source of really good fatty acids that we need in our diet.”

    Considine’s bill would create a licensing program under the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection and in partnership with research institutions. The license holders would plant, cultivate, grow, harvest, process, possess and deliver industrial hemp — Cannabis sativa with no more than 0.3 percent THC.

    “What the bill does is allow a university to come up with research. The first step is to make sure we have the right team to grow industrial hemp,” said the Democrat, who represents the 81st Assembly District in western Sauk County.

    “I have a very strong agricultural district,” Considine said. “Really productive land and people doing a lot of good things.”

    He noted the district has many farmers interested in “alternative cropping” and emphasized Wisconsin once was the “No. 1 producer of hemp.”

    The bill didn’t get a hearing in the session that ended in March, yet the proposal would seem to have wide appeal. National polls show support for such measures among Republicans and Democrats, farmers and hippies, conservationists and corporations, Libertarians and Greens, city dwellers and country folk.

    Considine said when he reworks the bill for re-introduction, he plans to build grassroots support, as well as line up organizational backing.

    “I’m committed to bringing it back,” he said. “I’m really hoping for the good of our state and the good of our economy that we can get moving.”

    Key to the drive is securing support from the state Farm Bureau Federation.

    Already, Considine has the backing of the Wisconsin Farmers Union, which has a policy stating the organization “joins all major agricultural associations in Wisconsin in supporting legislation to permit research and test plots in Wisconsin.”

    FEDERAL MOVES

    Meanwhile, pending in Congress is comprehensive legislation to legalize industrial hemp farming in the United States by amending the definition of marijuana in the Controlled Substances Act so that it will not include industrial hemp.

    Democrats Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Republicans Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul of Kentucky introduced the bill in the Senate, while Republican Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democrat Jared Polis of Colorado introduced the House measure.

    Polis has said he’s hopeful Congress will build on the Hemp Amendment and pass the Industrial Hemp Farming Act “to allow this historical American crop to once again thrive on our farmlands.”

    Without passage, farmers still risk being targeted by federal authorities.

    Last October, the Drug Enforcement Administration entered the sovereign lands of the Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin and destroyed a crop of about 30,000 plants. The tribe had legalized the growing of low-THC non-psychotropic hemp in May 2015, as provided for under the 2014 Farm Bill, and maintains that the DEA improperly destroyed the crop in the raid.

    The U.S. Attorney’s office said the DEA executed federal search warrants on “a large marijuana growing operation on tribal land,” according to a report published by the Associated Press last October.

    Since then, the Menominee Nation has filed a lawsuit asking a federal judge in Milwaukee to uphold the tribe’s right to grow industrial hemp. In February, the tribe filed a motion for summary judgment.

    “This is a straightforward legal question regarding the interpretation of federal law and we believe the court will decide this matter expediently,” Joan Delabreau, the tribe’s chairwoman, stated in a news release. “We are confident that the Farm Bill provisions require the federal government to recognize the Menominee Nation’s rights to cultivate industrial hemp.”

    In another case, a federal judge in late March lifted an injunction prohibiting a South Dakota tribal member from producing industrial hemp. U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Viken observed a “shifting legal landscape” on industrial hemp since the injunction was filed more than a decade ago.

    However, Viken’s order was a narrow ruling and did not resolve the question of whether the Farm Bill allows for growing hemp on Pine Ridge Indian land.

    As legislative and law enforcement actions multiply, here are some key facts about hemp:

    • Hemp and marijuana are of the same plant species — Cannabis sativa — but the two plants are not bred and cultivated in the same way. The level of THC is much, much lower in hemp than in pot. Hemp can’t produce a high, but it can be used to make a handsome shirt or provide nutrition.

    • Hemp stalks produce two types of fiber, according to Vote Hemp, a nonprofit advocacy organization. The outer bast fiber can be processed into long strands and the inner woody core can be processed into chips.

    • The fiber is durable and makes for comfortable and colorfast textiles. It is used in composites or can replace plastics or fiberglass in molded products. The fiber also can be used to make building insulation or paper, while the inner core can be used to make animal bedding or nitrogen-absorbent fertilizer. The stalk even holds promise as an alternative fuel.

    • The hemp seed — a tiny nut that consists of a meaty inner core and a hull — has uses as birdseed and, toasted, as a human snack. But broader uses involve dehulling the seed or crushing the seed for oil, because the inner core contains two essential fatty acids — Omega-3 and Omega-6 — as well as proteins.

    Advocates tout the benefits of hemp seed oil supplements, the culinary value of hemp oil and the cosmetic applications. Even the protein-rich leftover hemp meal has value and is used for animal feed as well as high-protein powders and flours for human consumption.

    The U.S. market for hemp is about $450 million to $600 million a year. But with few exceptions, U.S. growers are not profiting. There is no large-scale industrial hemp production in the U.S. and the U.S. market is dependent on imports for finished hemp products and hemp ingredients. About two dozen other countries export hemp to the United States, including Britain, France, Germany, Spain — and especially Canada. But the U.S. production lag may be about to change.

    Marching in Milwaukee, 420ing in Madison

    Plant the date: The sixth annual Milwaukee Marijuana March assembles at 2 p.m. May 7 at Kilbourn Park, 2300 N. Bremen St.

    A Facebook event page indicated nearly 700 marchers plan to attend the event hosted by Legalize Wisconsin and the Wisconsin chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

    Participants plan to gather in the park at 2 p.m. and march at 4 p.m. Before the march, state Rep. Melissa Sargent, a legislative leader in the effort to decriminalize and legalize marijuana, will address the crowd. Medical marijuana patient Trevor James Sand and his daughter Erica also are set to make comments.

    The event commemorates Global Marijuana March Day.

    Action comes earlier in Madison, where the fourth annual Madison 420 Festival takes place at 4:20 p.m. on April 22 at the Brinklounge, 701 E. Washington Ave.

    Madison NORML and Madison Hempfest present the celebration, featuring The Grasshoppers jamrock band, The Northern Pines Band, Nuggernaut, The Material Boys, Mudroom, Bathtub Spring, The Lower 5th, Gin Mill Hollow, The Woods, Gary David and the Enthusiasts, Deteourious, Flowpoetry and Mission, a Jerry Garcia tribute band.

    The event is a benefit for the Madison chapter of NORML.

    Both events have at least a bit to celebrate. For instance, Democratic lawmakers in Wisconsin pitched multiple reform bills in the 2015–16 session, including a legalization measure authored by Sargent and decriminalization legislation introduced by state Rep. Mandela Barnes and Sen. Chris Larson — all Democrats.

    To date, marijuana reform in Wisconsin has taken place mostly at the local level, with cities such as Madison and Milwaukee relaxing penalties for people found in possession of small amounts of pot.

    Twenty states have enacted laws to stop jailing people for possession of small amounts of marijuana.

    Also, voters in the District of Columbia and four states — Alaska, Colorado, Oregon and Washington — have approved taking marijuana production and sales off the criminal market and instead regulating and taxing the production and retailing of pot. However, marijuana remains illegal under federal law.

    A national Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll released March 25 found about 61 percent of those surveyed support legalizing marijuana. Most said they wanted to limit legalization to medical use or place restrictions on the amounts that can be purchased for recreational use.

    — Lisa Neff

  • U.S. hunters import 126,000 wildlife ‘trophies’ annually

    U.S. hunters import about 126,000 “wildlife trophies” annually and killed about 1.26 million animals between 2005 and 2014, according to the Humane Society International and The Humane Society of the United States.

    Trophy hunting is the killing of animals for body parts, such as the head and hide, for display or decor rather than for food and sustenance. A recent study examining the motivation for such hunts found that U.S. hunters glamorize the killing of an animal to demonstrate virility, prowess and dominance.

    A report from Humane Society International/Humane Society of the United States titled Trophy Hunting by the Numbers: the United States’ Role in Global Trophy Hunting, uses an analysis of hunting trophy import data obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

    Some findings:

    • Trophies are primarily imported from Canada and South Africa, followed by Namibia, Mexico, Zimbabwe, New Zealand, Tanzania, Argentina, Zambia and Botswana.

    • Trophy hunters most want to kill American black bears, impalas, common wildebeests, greater kudus, gemsboks, springboks and bonteboks.

    • Trophy hunters highly covet the so-called “African big five” — lions, elephants, leopards, white rhinos and buffalo. All of these species, except the African buffalo, are classified as near threatened or vulnerable on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.

    • The U.S. ports of entry that received the most wildlife trophies in the past decade were New York City; Pembina, North Dakota; Chicago; Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas; and Portal, North Dakota.

    “This report clearly shows the dire impact American trophy hunters are having on wildlife in other countries,” said Teresa M. Telecky, director of the wildlife department at HSI.

    She continued, “It’s outrageous that every year hunters take the lives of thousands of animals, many threatened with extinction, just to win a prize and show off. These animals need protection, not to be mounted on a wall. The fact that rare, majestic species are entering the U.S. in large and small ports of entry should alarm lawmakers and the public concerned about trophy hunting.”

    Hunting groups promote the hunts, offering accolades and awards to club members. The largest of these groups, Safari Club International, recently concluded its convention in Las Vegas, where more than 300 mammal hunts for more than 600 animals were auctioned off, and other hunts were arranged privately on the exhibit floor. An African lion trophy hunt can cost $13,500–$49,000. An African elephant hunt can cost $11,000–$70,000.

    SCI often uses the revenue from hunt sales to lobby against wildlife protection measures.

    For certain species, including lions, elephants, leopards and rhinos, the U.S. is the largest trophy-importing country.

    HSI and The HSUS, in a statement on the report, pledged to continue to seek new protection under the U.S. Endangered Species Act for species that meet the criteria for listing.

    The African lion is the latest species to receive ESA protection, after a multi-year effort by animal protection organizations, including HSI and The HSUS.

    The groups are seeking increased ESA protections for species currently listed in a lower category of protection, as was recently done for the African elephant. HSI and The HSUS are also urging corporations — such as Swarovski Optik  — to end sponsorship of trophy-hunting advocacy organizations.

  • Big gulp: GOP advances water privatization

    “Aqua America” sounds like a water park on the shore of a great lake.

    Rather, Aqua America is the second-largest publicly traded water utility company in the United States, and someday the company — or Veolia or Suez — could take control of municipal water systems in Wisconsin.

    Republican lawmakers fast-tracked AB 554/SB 432, legislation that would diminish public influence and make it easier to privatize local water supplies.

    Environmentalists in the state call the measure the “Water Privatization Bill.” The Assembly approved AB 554 on Jan. 12. A Senate floor vote had not been held as WiG went to press on Feb. 10.

    Current state law allows for the privatization of systems, provided citizens have a say.

    The process currently works like this: A municipality must adopt an ordinance authorizing privatization, then secure approval from the state Public Service Commission and then put the proposal to the voters in a referendum.

    In 2008 and 2009, Milwaukee officials considered privatizing the city’s water. A coalition of community leaders, environmental groups and unions — KPOW/Keep Public Our Water — fought the plan, which would have privatized Milwaukee’s water system for up to a century.

    The new privatization bill puts the burden of bringing a referendum on citizens. A municipality would adopt an ordinance, but a referendum wouldn’t be held unless citizens wage a successful petition drive. And, with no referendum, the PSC would approve privatization.

    Democratic lawmakers worked through January to counter the measure and try to improve the bill. In a Senate committee vote in January, Sens. Chris Larson and Julie Lassa offered several unsuccessful amendments that would have reserved some control for local citizens.

    Larson, in early February, also was working with Reps. Amanda Stuck, D-Appleton, and Jonathan Brostoff, D-Milwaukee, to advance a measure — LRB 4602/1 — intended to keep water and sewer utilities under local control.

    “I am appalled that my colleagues across the aisle are trying to take Wisconsin down the dangerous path of privatizing water,” Brostoff said. “A one-time privatization scheme payoff pales in comparison to risking our public safety.”

    Pushing privatization

    Most Americans get their household water from publicly owned and operated services.

    The polls show most Americans want to keep these services. In Wisconsin, there’s been no public outcry from city and county officials for legislative change.

    “As a member of the Assembly Committee on Energy Utilities, I did not hear testimony from any municipal leader asking for expanding the ability of corporations to take over their water,” Stuck said. “Instead, what we heard was a desire to keep control of these vital utilities local, so that decisions about how to keep a cost-effective and safe water supply are made by the local community and not by the profit-seeking shareholders of private companies.”

    So, what’s driving a legislative push for privatization?

    The Wisconsin Democracy Campaign reported in late January that AB 554, authored by Rep. Tyler August, R-Lake Geneva, and SB 432, written by Sen. Frank Lasee, R-De Pere, is akin to draft legislation — the Water/Wastewater Utility Public-Private Partnership Act — circulated by the American Legislative Exchange Council.

    ALEC is a special interest group of businesses and politicians that has advanced a series of anti-immigrant, anti-voter, anti-choice and anti-environment measures. Much of ALEC’s funding comes from trade groups, corporations such as Exxon Mobil and right-wing organizations like the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation.

    Proponents argue privatization is a solution for municipalities burdened by capital improvements to systems that have been underfunded due to years of deflated rates.

    They also maintain that water utilities are businesses and companies can serve consumers better than gthe overnment.

    Some proponents of privatization illustrate their arguments by pointing to the water crisis in Michigan, where officials at nearly every level of government failed the people of Flint.

    Those arguments, however, unleash a flood of opposing positions from those who see the cost-cutting profit motive as the underlying cause of the Flint crisis.

    “The residents of Flint were stripped of their democratically elected authority and, in the name of saving a few dollars, have been forced to sacrifice their health in the process,” said the Rev. Allen Overton of Concerned Pastors for Social Action, part of a coalition seeking federal court intervention to secure safe water in Flint. “The community deserves accountability, transparency and justice, in addition to water that is safe to drink.”

    Opposing privatization

    “Government has a level of accountability to citizens that private companies do not,” stated Kerry Schumann, executive director of the Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters.

    She continued, “Think about when you have a problem with your phone service. You typically spend hours being passed from faceless person to computer system and back to another faceless person who could be anywhere in the world. Sometimes it takes days, weeks or more to solve the problem.

    “Now imagine that water starts coming out of your tap brown, your family starts getting sick and you have to attempt to get help from a faceless, out-of-state private corporation that has no accountability to you or other voters living in the community. It’s bad enough running into this lack of responsiveness when you’re talking about a phone plan. The health of your family is certainly more important than phone service, and we should treat it that way.”

    The league is on record as opposing the privatization bill, as are other leading environmental, consumer and good-government groups in the state. Opponents include the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, Clean Wisconsin, the state Sierra Club, Midwest Environmental Advocates and Milwaukee Riverkeeper.

    “Not just across the country, but across the entire globe, water privatization has failed to increase the access to or quality of water supplies for communities time and time again,” read a statement from Milwaukee Riverkeeper intended to motivate members to urge their senators to reject the privatization bill.

    These groups take the position that access to water is a right and water should not be a source of windfall profits. They, and national watchdog organizations, such as Food and Water Watch and Public Citizen, offer these arguments against privatization:

    • Privatization leads to rate increases because corporations seek to maximize profits for investors.

    Investor-owned utilities typically charge 33 percent more for water, according to Food and Water Watch.

    After privatization, water rates increase at about three times the rate of inflation, with an average increase of 18 percent every other year.

    • Privatization undermines water quality, because the motivation for companies is profit, not the public good. Aqua America, headquartered in Pennsylvania, took in $769 million in revenues in 2013 for a $221 million profit. The company’s CEO received $3.2 million in compensation that year.

    • Privatization reduces public rights and allows the local government to abdicate control over a public resource.

    • Private financing costs more than public financing.

    • Privatization leads to job losses as companies minimize costs to increase profits. Food and Water Watch, which opposes any commodification of water, said privatization typically leads to a loss of one in three water jobs.

    • Privatization contributes to corruption because companies can restrict public access to information.

    • Privatization can contribute to sprawl because companies are motivated to expand infrastructure and extend services.

    • Privatization could lead to bulk water exports or changes in water use, including sales to the oil and gas industry for hydraulic fracturing.

    • Privatization is difficult to reverse.

    The crisis in Flint prompted people across the nation to focus on the quality of the water that comes out of their tap and the management of their utility.

    There’s also a global big picture to consider: The World Bank predicts that by 2025, two-thirds of the world’s population will run short of fresh drinking water.

    Wisconsin will not run short of drinking water by 2025, but who or what will control how much water costs — or where it goes?

  • Proposed hog farm prompts Bayfield County to tighten regs

    UPDATED: With a proposed factory farm threatening to foul Wisconsin’s “Crown Jewel,” the citizens of Bayfield County are not turning away from the stink or running from the fight.

    State law prohibits the local jurisdiction from saying “no” to the proposed “concentrated animal feeding operation” in the town of Eileen, but the county on Jan. 26 adopted ordinances intended to tighten regulations and protect the health and safety of the area’s residents and the environment.

    Bayfield County supervisors voted unanimously for an ordinance to create an operations permit for large-scale CAFOs and also for an ordinance to create an animal manure permit. The approach, creating local regulations on operations, is like the strategy local jurisdictions employed to control frac sand mines.

    The grassroots Farms Not Factories encouraged people to attend the meeting to show their support for stricter control and their opposition to the siting of the factory farm. The votes brought a standing ovation from opponents of the project, who are concerned with air emissions, odor impacts, water pollution, the release of pathogens and inadequate regulatory oversight.

    The proposal

    About a year ago, Reicks View Farms filed an application with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources seeking a permit to discharge annually about 6.8 million gallons of liquid manure, to be produced by 26,000 hogs at a planned breeding and feeding operation in Bayfield County. The manure would be stored in pits under covered barns and then injected into soil on about 1,300 acres in the Lake Superior watershed. Reicks wants to move the operation from Iowa because of the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus that’s so devastating to suckling pigs. Animals would be raised at the Wisconsin Badgerwood CAFO and then shipped to Iowa.

    An application filed with the state indicated the operation would create 27 new jobs, but didn’t say whether the positions would be permanent or what salaries they might pay.

    Farms Not Factories says a document provided to county officials and prepared by Reicks stated the business selected Eileen because of “its natural seclusion” — referring to the area’s isolation from hog farms in Iowa, Illinois and other parts of Wisconsin.

    The response

    Wisconsinites who care about the state’s outdoors know about a different type of “natural seclusion” in the region, which is home to the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Iron River National Fish Hatchery, North Country National Scenic Trail, St. Croix National Scenic Riverway and Whittlesey Creek National Wildlife Refuge.

    Wisconsinites familiar with the state’s geography also know that Eileen is in the Fish Creek Watershed and less than 8 miles from the Chequamegon Bay and Lake Superior. One of Farms Not Factories’ slogans is “10 percent of the world’s fresh water is more valuable to this planet than cheap bacon and pork tenderloin.”

    Wisconsin already is home to about 270 large-scale CAFOs. The number has skyrocketed from about 50 in 2006, when Gov. Jim Doyle signed legislation setting basic state standards for CAFOs and removing local control over siting the farms. “That legislation was put in place to provide regulatory certainty for Big Ag,” said Mary Dougherty of Farms Not Factories.

    The Badgerwood CAFO would be the first such operation in Lake Superior basin and the largest hog farm in the state. Farms Not Factories said the hogs at Badgerwood would produce as much waste as a city of 50,000 people.

    A moratorium on the development of large-scale farms was enacted in both Bayfield after plans for Badgerwood emerged.

    Since then, the project and possible responses have been under review.

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has said it is looking at the project, in part because of concerns about pollution raised by the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Ojibwe, whose reservation is east of Ashland on the Lake Superior shore, and the Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Ojibwe, whose reservation is north of Bayfield.

    The DNR agreed to do an environmental-impact statement and has collected a lot of public input — hundreds of suggestions and statements from citizens, scientists and advocacy groups. A draft of the EIS is yet to be released. Public comment would follow, then any revisions before the publication of a final EIS, which may or may not influence the state’s decision on the application for Badgerwood.

    Meanwhile, the reviews seem complete in Bayfield and Ashland counties.

    A committee established by the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors studied the issue, guided by the dual goals of “having a thriving agricultural community and maintaining the public’s health and safety and a healthy environment,” according to its final report.

    The committee studied issues relating to groundwater, surface water, microbiology and air quality and recommended the adoption of the Large-Scale Confined Animal Feeding Operations Ordinance to require new or expanding livestock operations of 1,000 animals or more to obtain a county operations permit and meet any conditions attached to the permit.

    The committee made some other recommendations, including the adoption of the Bayfield County Animal Waste Storage and Management Ordinance requiring new or expanding CAFOs to obtain a permit for storing and managing manure.

    “We can’t legally say ‘no,’” said Dougherty, “So, as a result, we came up with this — because we have to do something.”

    A poll recently released by Northland College’s Center for Rural Communities shows 63.3 percent of residents oppose the farm and there’s strong support for the county ordinances.

    Nearly three-quarters — 72.5 percent — of households support the tighter local regulations at the county level.

    Residents’ top five concerns for factory farms are water quality, smell, divisions in the community, air quality and health risks.

    These concerns are shared elsewhere in Wisconsin, which is why activists are developing a statewide coalition.

    “We have to have this as a mass movement and say this type of agriculture is not Wisconsin,” said Dougherty.

  • Wisconsin Republicans declare open season against environment

    Republicans took target practice in early January after declaring open season on Wisconsin’s environmental resources.

    The new year began with a bang, bang in the Capitol, where in just two days Republicans presided over a series of hearings on bills aimed at rolling back protections for air, land and water and at the same time curtailing the authority of local governments to protect natural resources.

    “From developing on lake beds to filling in wetlands to taking away local governments’ authority to protect the health of their communities, the Legislature is starting 2016 off with a pretty loud message to Wisconsinites,” said Kerry Schumann, executive director of the Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters. The message, Schumann said, is lawmakers “are putting the wishes of big developers, factory farms, frac sand mining companies and other polluting interests above the needs of their constituents.”

    WLCV and the Sierra Club-John Muir Chapter, both nonprofit environmental advocacy groups, identified two measures of special concern — AB 600/SB 459, aka the “polluter grab bag,” and AB 582/SB 464, aka the “developer grab bag.”

    Supporters of the measures say they protect and advance “property rights.”

    Opponents say they further erode protections for Wisconsin’s natural resources.

    ‘Polluter grab bag’

    AB 600/SB 459 would allow developers to build on lake beds, provide incentives for developing a million acres of wetlands that lack federal protections and allow lakefront property owners to dredge up to three dump-truck loads of lakebed sediment every year.

    The Assembly Committee on Environment and Forestry held a hearing Jan. 5 on the bill, which is backed by Americans for Prosperity, League of Wisconsin Municipalities, Waste Management, Wisconsin Builders Association, Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation, Wisconsin Potato and Vegetable Growers Association and Wisconsin Realtors Association.

    Registered opponents include WLCV, Clean Lakes Alliance, Clean Wisconsin, League of Women Voters, River Alliance, Sierra Club, Nature Conservancy, Wisconsin Association of Lakes, Wisconsin Land and Water Conservation Association and Wisconsin Wetlands Association.

    “AB 600 undermines the public trust doctrine, allowing property owners on Wisconsin lakes, including the Great Lakes, to dredge material without any oversight and in most cases without even testing to make sure the dredged material is not contaminated,” said Bill Davis, director of the Sierra Club-John Muir Chapter. “And the bill gives away the public lake bed.”

    ‘Developer grab bag’

    AB 582/SB 464 would prohibit counties from placing moratoriums on new development. It also would prevent local governments from creating zoning requirements in response to a developer expressing an interest in locating there, according to the WLCV.

    The measure would provide financial incentives to develop land that is held in conservation easements and allow developers to shop around for a judge if there is a challenge to a permit.

    The Senate Committee on Insurance, Housing and Trade held a hearing on Jan. 5 on SB 464, which has the support of WEC Energy Group, Wisconsin Builders Association and Wisconsin Realtors Association.

    Opponents include Clean Wisconsin, League of Women Voters, River Alliance, Sierra Club, the town of Saratoga and WLCV.

    “The polluter and developer grab bags open the floodgates for developers, frac sand mining companies, factory farms and other special interests to make our water dirtier, fill in our wetlands and run roughshod over local communities and private citizens,” Schumann said.

    Elizabeth Ward, conservation programs coordinator with the Sierra Club, added, “This bill provides more giveaways to major corporations, like frac sand and oil pipeline companies, and removes the rights of landowners across Wisconsin to enjoy their land.”

    Also on the watch list this session …

    • SB 479 was the subject of a Jan. 5 hearing held by the Senate Committee on Insurance, Housing and Trade. Backers include a union local — the Madison Area Builders Association.

    Opponents maintain the measure would undermine Dane County’s authority on zoning and thus threaten local protections for wildlife and habitat.

    “This is another example of the state legislators attacking local control and making decisions that should be made at the local level,” said Dave Blouin, chair of Sierra’s Four Lakes Group.

    • SB 434 would open up more state forests to timber production. The bill also would prohibit the state Department of Natural Resources from offering guidance to property owners on wildlife action plans or requiring property owners to take action to protect species at risk.

    The state’s lobbying records show the Sierra Club joining WLCV in opposing the measure, which has support from Great Lakes Timber Professionals Association, Wisconsin Alliance of Forest Owners, Wisconsin Counties Association, Wisconsin County Forests Association, Wisconsin Land and Water Conservation Association, Wisconsin Towns Association and Wisconsin Wildlife Federation.

    The Senate Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining and Forestry held a hearing on the bill on Jan. 5.

    • SB 432 would promote privatizing Wisconsin’s water by allowing communities to sell water utilities to private out-of-state companies. The Senate Committee on Workforce Development, Public Works and Military Affairs held a Jan. 5 hearing on the measure, which is backed by some labor groups and opposed by environmental groups.

    • AB 603 would prohibit counties from enacting stronger protections for waters if local authorities determined state minimum standards were insufficient.

    The Assembly Committee on Natural Resources and Sporting Heritage held a hearing on Jan. 6 on the bill, which is opposed by WLCV, Clean Lakes Alliance, Clean Wisconsin, River Alliance and Wisconsin Association of Lakes.

    • SB 288 would remove the nuclear moratorium, lifting barriers to constructing new nuclear power plants in the state. It includes the requirement that new plants have a plan of action for dealing with hazardous waste.

    Additionally, the bill would put nuclear energy on the list of preferred energy options in the state, despite high costs associated with production and major concerns about the disposal of waste and the dismantling of outdated facilities.

    The Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy held a hearing Jan. 5 on the measure, which has overwhelming support from energy companies, labor unions and trade associations.

    Opponents include the Citizens Utility Board, League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, and environmental groups.

    Action alert

    Track Wisconsin environmental issues at conservationvoters.org, the website for the Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters.

    Track legislation at notify.legis.wisconsin.gov.

  • Climate change imperils major U.S. landmarks

    The president marked the centennial of Harriet Tubman’s death a year ago by designating 25,000 acres on Maryland’s Eastern Shore as a new national monument. By 2050, if sea levels in the Chesapeake Bay continue to rise at twice the global rate because of climate change, the monument to the legendary abolitionist could be largely underwater.

    A report from the Union of Concerned Scientists, released on May 20, lists 30 at-risk national landmarks and details the effects of rising sea levels, worsening wildfires and more frequent and severe floods.

    “You can almost trace the history of the United States through these sites,” said Adam Markham, the report’s co-author and the director of climate impacts at UCS. “The imminent risks to these sites and the artifacts they contain threaten to pull apart the quilt that tells the story of the nation’s heritage and history.”

    Jamestown, the first permanent English settlement in the Americas, is likely to be submerged by rising seas by the end of the century, according to UCS.

    Other sites may become inaccessible.

    “Fort Monroe in Virginia, which played a crucial role in the fall of slavery, will become an island unto itself within 70 years,” said Markham. “Castillo de San Marcos, in St. Augustine, Florida, also is extremely vulnerable.”

    The fort faces increasing risks from flooding and projections from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration show that, without major engineering feats, the grounds surrounding the fort will become permanently inundated with three feet of sea level rise by the end of the century.

    Rising seas and the threat of worsening storm surges also are endangering historic districts in Annapolis, Maryland, and Charleston, South Carolina, as well as native Hawaiian structures on the Big Island and archaeological remains in Florida.

    “Early Floridians constructed highly elaborate structures out of oyster and clam shells in the Ten Thousand Islands, dating back to 1,000 B.C.,” said Markham. These sites in the Everglades face an imminent threat from climate impacts.”

    Across the peninsula in the northern part of Canaveral National Seashore, a more than 1,200-year-old shell mound thought to be the highest in North America, is endangered. The National Park Service and the University of Central Florida have created a “living shoreline” of oyster mats, Spartina grass and mangroves to try to protect the mound from erosion.

    In the West, climate change is increasing the risk of large wildfires in the Sierra Nevada mountains by driving up temperatures, reducing winter snowpack and drying out forests for longer periods. USC said that it threatens historically significant structures in former Gold Rush country.

    Up north, in Alaska, melting sea ice and thawing permafrost allowed winter storms to erode the coastlines of Cape Krusenstern National Monument and the Bering Land Bridge National Preserve in Kotzebue Sound. The report said the damage is occurring at an unprecedented rate. “Irreplaceable prehistoric artifacts are actually crumbling out of the shorelines in these Alaskan sites and washing out to sea,” said Markham.

    Meanwhile, in the Southwest, there have been intense fires followed by heavy rains during the past 15 years.

    “Massive fires have swept through Mesa Verde National Park and Bandelier National Monument and other southwestern sites, damaging ancient pueblo masonry, petroglyphs and pottery,” said Markham. “Heavy rains and the extraordinary floods that have followed some of these fires have caused even more damage, destroying trails, damaging adobe buildings and washing away vital archaeological resources.”

    The report, said UCS press secretary Lisa Nurnberger, is meant to be illustrative rather than exhaustive, “since we know it doesn’t capture every important at-risk historic and cultural site. If it had, it would be far, far longer than it is.”

    The researchers came across other sites where climate change is taking a toll, she said. “One of those places is the Apostle Islands,” a group of 22 islands in Lake Superior, off the Bayfield Peninsula in far northern Wisconsin. The National Park Service refers to the Apostle Islands as the “jewels of Lake Superior.”

    The Society for American Archaeology, a nonprofit dedicated to protecting archaeological heritage, stated, in conjunction with the report’s release, that more attention should be paid to preserving endangered archaeological sites. It’s the first time the group has sought to draw attention to the damage caused by climate change.

    To slow the rate of change and give archaeologists, historic preservationists and land managers time to protect the sites, scientists say carbon emissions must be reduced, said Angela Anderson, director of the Climate and Energy Program at UCS. “Cutting carbon emissions significantly and quickly can slow the pace of sea level rise … and slow the expansion of the wildfire season.”